History 2021 Paper II 50 marks 150 words Compulsory Critically examine

Q1

Critically examine the following statements in about 150 words each: (a) The introduction of Western education transformed India in unforeseen ways. (10 marks) (b) Tipu Sultan had little success in setting forth a course of change significantly different from the general experience of 18th century crisis of Indian politics and society where public life tended over and over to become a system of plundering. (10 marks) (c) The Vernacular Press Act of 1878 was designed for better control of the vernacular press and to empower the government with more effective means of punishing and repressing seditious writings. (10 marks) (d) The rise of the Communist Movement in India in the 1920s lent a militant and revolutionary content to the Trade Union Movement. (10 marks) (e) In the first decade of the 20th century, the atmosphere was ripe for the emergence of revolutionary groups to fill up the vacant space in the political map of the country. (10 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

निम्नलिखित कथनों में से प्रत्येक का लगभग 150 शब्दों में समालोचनात्मक परीक्षण कीजिए : (a) पाश्चात्य शिक्षा के लागू होने से भारत में अनपेक्षित परिवर्तन हुए । (10 अंक) (b) 18वीं सदी की भारतीय राजनीति तथा समाज के संकट के सामान्य अनुभव, जहाँ जन-जीवन बारंबार लूटपाट की व्यवस्था का शिकार होता था, से अलग बदलाव की व्यवस्था को स्थापित करने में टीपू सुल्तान को बहुत कम सफलता मिली । (10 अंक) (c) देशी प्रेस अधिनियम (वर्नैक्यूलर प्रेस एक्ट), 1878 को देशी प्रेस पर बेहतर नियंत्रण के लिए बनाया गया था जिससे सरकार और अधिक प्रभावी तरीकों से राजद्रोही लेखन को दंडित एवं दमित करने में सशक्त बन सके । (10 अंक) (d) 1920 के दशक में भारत में कम्युनिस्ट आंदोलन के उदय ने ट्रेड यूनियन आंदोलन को एक उग्रवादी तथा क्रांतिकारी सामग्री प्रदान की । (10 अंक) (e) 20वीं सदी के प्रथम दशक में, देश के राजनीतिक फलक की खाली जगह को भरने हेतु क्रांतिकारी समूहों के उदय के लिए उपयुक्त वातावरण था । (10 अंक)

Directive word: Critically examine

This question asks you to critically examine. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'critically examine' demands balanced evaluation with evidence for and against each statement. Allocate approximately 30 words per sub-part (150 words ÷ 5 = 30 each), spending roughly equal time on all parts since marks are evenly distributed. Structure each sub-part as: brief context → arguments supporting the statement → counter-arguments/critical evaluation → nuanced conclusion. No introduction or conclusion spanning all parts is needed; treat each as standalone critical analysis.

Key points expected

  • (a) Western education: Macaulay's Minute (1835), English-educated middle class emergence, unintended consequences like rise of nationalism and social reform movements (Raja Rammohan Roy, Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar), critique of 'cultural colonialism' vs 'modernization' debate
  • (b) Tipu Sultan: Mysorean rockets, administrative centralization, French alliance, economic reforms (sericulture, state trading); yet failure to transcend 18th century military-fiscalism, continued plunder warfare (Malabar raids), inability to build durable alliances against British
  • (c) Vernacular Press Act 1878: Lytton's reaction to nationalist criticism, 'licensing' provisions, Amrita Bazar Patrika's switch to English, comparison with Press Act 1910; yet limited success due to growing nationalist consciousness and underground circulation
  • (d) Communist movement 1920s: M.N. Roy's role, Kanpur Bolshevik Conference (1925), WPP formation, radicalization of AITUC, Meerut Conspiracy Case (1929); distinction between 'economist' and 'political' trade unionism, shift from Gandhian methods
  • (e) Revolutionary groups 1900s: Partition of Bengal (1905), Swadeshi movement's militant wing, Anushilan Samiti (1902), Jugantar, Alipore Bomb Case (1908), 'vacant space' refers to Moderate failure and Extremist limitations; global influences (Irish, Russian)

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Chronology accuracy20%10Precise dating across all parts: 1835 for Macaulay's Minute, 1878 for Vernacular Press Act, 1920s communist emergence with 1925 Kanpur conference, 1905-1908 for revolutionary groups; correctly places Tipu in 1790s-1799 without anachronismsBroadly correct period identification but vague on specific years; minor errors like conflating 1878 Act with 1910 Press Act or misdating communist emergence to 1910sSignificant chronological errors: placing Vernacular Press Act in Curzon's tenure, dating communist movement to 1940s, or confusing Tipu with 18th century nawabs chronologically
Source & evidence20%10Specific evidence for each: Macaulay's 'interpreter class' quote for (a); Tipu's rocket technology and revenue figures for (b); specific newspapers (Kesari, Amrita Bazar Patrika) and magistrate powers for (c); M.N. Roy's 'India in Transition' and AITUC sessions for (d); Barin Ghosh, Aurobindo's 'Bhawani Mandir' for (e)General references without specifics—mentions 'English education' without Macaulay, 'newspapers' without names, 'revolutionaries' without group identification; some evidence but not tightly linked to claimsNo concrete evidence or examples; relies on assertion ('education changed things') without naming policies, individuals, institutions, or publications; factual errors in named evidence
Multi-perspective analysis20%10Genuine critical examination with balanced arguments: for (a) both modernization thesis and Orientalist critique; for (b) both Tipu's innovations and his continuity with 18th century warfare; for (c) official rationale vs. nationalist resistance; for (d) communist contribution vs. earlier militant trade unionism; for (e) objective conditions vs. historiographical debate on 'vacant space'Some critical balance but uneven—strong on one side, weak on other; or treats 'critically examine' as 'describe' with minimal evaluation; partial engagement with complexityOne-sided narrative accepting statements at face value or rejecting without evidence; no engagement with historiographical debates; treats all statements as fully true or fully false
Historiographic framing20%10Awareness of historiographical positions: for (a) cites Clive Dewey or Aparna Basu on education; for (b) engages with Habib or Brittlebank on Tipu; for (c) references Metcalf on colonial information control; for (d) acknowledges Datta or Overstreet on communist historiography; for (e) references Hobsbawm's 'revolutionary situation' or Sarkar on Extremism-Revolutionary continuumImplicit historiographical awareness without naming scholars; uses terms like 'historians argue' or 'some scholars' without specificity; conventional narrative without explicit framingNo historiographical awareness; presents all claims as self-evident facts; anachronistic moral judgments; no recognition that 'unforeseen ways' or 'vacant space' are interpretive constructs
Conclusion & synthesis20%10Each sub-part reaches nuanced judgment: (a) education as 'double-edged' tool of empire; (b) Tipu as transitional figure—more innovative than peers yet constrained by structural limits; (c) Act as reactive, ultimately counterproductive; (d) communists accelerated but didn't originate militant unionism; (e) 'vacant space' overstated—continuities with Extremism, yet qualitative shift in methods; tight, evaluative final sentencesDescriptive endings without clear evaluative stance; or abrupt conclusions without synthesis; some judgments but not clearly derived from preceding analysisNo conclusion in sub-parts; trails off with description; or contradictory final judgment unsupported by evidence; generic statements ('thus it was important') applicable to any topic

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from History 2021 Paper II