Q6
(a) What was "enlightened" about the Age of Enlightenment? (20 marks) (b) What were the causes and consequences of the revolutionary upsurge of the 1840s in Europe? (20 marks) (c) The white-minority government of South Africa treated the natives very badly by denying them fundamental rights and made Apartheid as official policy. How were the people able to end Apartheid policy and establish a transitional rule? (10 marks)
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a) प्रबुद्धता के युग के बारे में क्या "प्रबुद्ध" था ? (20 अंक) (b) 1840 के दशक में यूरोप में आई क्रांतिकारी लहर के कारण एवं परिणाम क्या थे ? (20 अंक) (c) दक्षिण अफ्रीका की श्वेत-अल्पमत की सरकार, रंगभेद की नीति को आधिकारिक नीति बनाकर वहाँ के मूल निवासियों को उनके आधारभूत अधिकारों से वंचित कर उनके साथ बुरा व्यवहार करती थी । वहाँ के लोग रंगभेद की नीति को समाप्त कर संक्रमणकालीन शासन लागू करने में कैसे सफल हुए ? (10 अंक)
Directive word: Explain
This question asks you to explain. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.
See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
The directive 'explain' demands conceptual clarity with causal reasoning across all three parts. Allocate approximately 40% of word budget to part (a) given its 20 marks, 40% to part (b), and 20% to part (c). Structure as: brief introduction defining 'enlightenment' as unifying theme; body addressing each part sequentially with clear sub-headings; conclusion synthesizing how Enlightenment ideals → 1848 revolutions → anti-colonial struggles like anti-Apartheid form a continuum of rights-based movements.
Key points expected
- Part (a): Define 'enlightened' through reason, empiricism, secularism, and individual rights; cite Locke's natural rights, Kant's 'Sapere Aude', and contrast with pre-Enlightenment scholasticism/religious dogma
- Part (a): Explain institutional dimensions—separation of powers (Montesquieu), social contract (Rousseau), and economic liberalism (Smith) as applied reason
- Part (b): Analyze causes—economic crisis of 1840s, liberal-nationalist aspirations, agrarian distress, and the 'February Revolution' contagion effect across European states
- Part (b): Assess consequences—failure of unified Germany/Italy, Metternich system's collapse, Marx's 'Communist Manifesto' response, and long-term constitutional reforms
- Part (c): Trace anti-Apartheid struggle from ANC formation (1912) through Defiance Campaign, Sharpeville (1960), Soweto (1976), to Mandela's release and CODESA negotiations
- Part (c): Explain transition mechanisms—international sanctions (India's role at UN, Commonwealth expulsion), internal mass mobilization, and elite negotiation for democratic transition
Evaluation rubric
| Dimension | Weight | Max marks | Excellent | Average | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chronology accuracy | 20% | 10 | Precise dating: for (a) places Enlightenment c.1685-1815 with key works (Locke's Two Treatises 1689, Kant 1784); for (b) sequences 1848 revolutions correctly (Paris February → German March → Italian uprisings); for (c) accurately orders Apartheid legislation (1948 implementation, 1950 Group Areas Act, 1990 Mandela release, 1994 elections) | Broad century markers correct but specific dates missing or confused; conflates 1848 with 1830/1870 revolutions; vague '1960s-1990s' for South Africa without landmark events | Serious anachronisms—places Enlightenment before Renaissance, treats 1848 as single unified revolution, or reverses Apartheid chronology suggesting Mandela preceded Sharpeville |
| Source & evidence | 20% | 10 | Direct quotations: Kant's 'dare to know' for (a); Marx's 'spectre of communism' or Metternich's 'madness' for (b); Mandela's 'I have cherished the ideal' from Rivonia Trial or Tutu's CODESA role for (c); cites Indian connection—Nehru's solidarity, UN resolutions led by India | Paraphrases key ideas without attribution; mentions thinkers/events by name but no direct evidence; generic reference to 'freedom struggle' without South African specificity | No primary source engagement; invents quotations; confuses thinkers (e.g., attributes social contract to Smith); omits Indian/Third World dimension entirely in part (c) |
| Multi-perspective analysis | 20% | 10 | For (a) contrasts French philosophes with Scottish Enlightenment; for (b) balances liberal-nationalist vs. socialist interpretations of 1848; for (c) presents both internal resistance (ANC/PAC) and external pressure (sanctions, Cold War dynamics) plus white liberal opposition; acknowledges gender/race dimensions | Single narrative per part—Enlightenment as purely intellectual, 1848 as purely political, Apartheid as purely moral struggle; mentions but doesn't develop alternative viewpoints | Wholly one-dimensional—Enlightenment as unalloyed progress, 1848 as complete failure, Apartheid as ended solely by Mandela's personal sacrifice; no structural or international analysis |
| Historiographic framing | 20% | 10 | For (a) references Gay's 'The Enlightenment' vs. Horkheimer/Adorno's 'Dialectic of Enlightenment' critique; for (b) cites R.R. Palmer's 'Age of Democratic Revolution' or Marxist 'springtime of peoples' framing; for (c) engages Mandela's 'Long Walk to Freedom' historiography vs. revisionist critiques of negotiated settlement; connects to Indian decolonization historiography | Implicit awareness of debates without naming historians; describes events without situating them in scholarly controversies; treats historiography as 'facts' rather than interpretation | No historiographic awareness; presents contested interpretations as settled truth; anachronistic presentism—judges 18th/19th century actors by 21st century standards without contextualization |
| Conclusion & synthesis | 20% | 10 | Synthesizes three parts into coherent argument: Enlightenment's rights discourse → 1848's attempt at popular sovereignty → anti-Apartheid's realization of universal human rights; reflects on incomplete realization—limits of liberalism in 1848, compromises of South African transition; connects to contemporary relevance (authoritarian resurgence, ongoing inequality) | Summarizes each part separately without integration; generic 'lessons for today' without specific linkage between the three movements; restates introduction | No conclusion or abrupt ending; introduces entirely new material in conclusion; contradictory synthesis—claims Enlightenment irrelevant to 1848 or Apartheid struggle disconnected from earlier rights traditions |
Practice this exact question
Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.
Evaluate my answer →More from History 2021 Paper II
- Q1 Critically examine the following statements in about 150 words each: (a) The introduction of Western education transformed India in unfores…
- Q2 (a) India had been the world leader in the field of hand spun and hand woven yarn and cloth for many centuries. Many nationalist and Marxis…
- Q3 (a) How did English utilitarian thinking impact India in the British era? (20 marks) (b) The same Gandhiji who withdrew the Non-Cooperation…
- Q4 (a) Discuss the major constitutional developments in India after 1858 and their impact on society and polity. (20 marks) (b) Discuss the ch…
- Q5 Critically examine the following statements in about 150 words each: (a) There were many reasons why the industrial revolution first happen…
- Q6 (a) What was "enlightened" about the Age of Enlightenment? (20 marks) (b) What were the causes and consequences of the revolutionary upsurg…
- Q7 (a) The rise of nationalism across nations shattered the chains which held together the empires of modern Europe. Discuss. (20 marks) (b) I…
- Q8 (a) Europe was at war with itself in the first half of the twentieth century with a long cease-fire. Comment. (20 marks) (b) The impact of…