(a) What was "enlightened" about the Age of Enlightenment? (20 marks)

(b) What were the causes and consequences of the revolutionary upsurge of the 1840s in Europe? (20 marks)

(c) The white-minority government of South Africa treated the natives ve

Question

(a) What was "enlightened" about the Age of Enlightenment? (20 marks)

(b) What were the causes and consequences of the revolutionary upsurge of the 1840s in Europe? (20 marks)

(c) The white-minority government of South Africa treated the natives very badly by denying them fundamental rights and made Apartheid as official policy. How were the people able to end Apartheid policy and establish a transitional rule? (10 marks)

UPSC Answer Check · Accepted Answer

Enlightenment. The Age of Enlightenment was “enlightened” because it replaced scholasticism and religious dogma with reason, empiricism, secularism and individual rights. Where pre-modern thought often derived authority from revelation, church hierarchy or custom, Enlightenment thinkers asked what could be known, what justified government, and what rights belonged to persons. Empiricism made experience the test of claims, secularism separated public policy from clerical authority, and Locke’s natural rights of life, liberty and property gave individuals a moral claim against arbitrary power. Kant’s “Sapere Aude” — dare to know — made autonomy and public reason the standard. This was not merely philosophical: it became applied reason in institutions. Montesquieu’s separation of powers checked arbitrary rule, Rousseau’s social contract located legitimacy in popular will, and Smith’s economic liberalism argued that free exchange and division of labour could raise general welfare. The causal mechanism was simple: once reason questioned divine right and privilege, rights-based claims became politically usable.
1848. The revolutionary upsurge of the 1840s followed because Enlightenment-derived liberal and nationalist aspirations met material crisis. Bad harvests of 1846-47, agrarian distress, industrial unemployment and the economic crisis of the 1840s made existing regimes seem incompetent. The February Revolution in Paris, which overthrew the July Monarchy, then produced a contagion effect across Europe: demands for constitutions, civil liberties, national self-determination and social reform spread to German states, Austria, Italy and Hungary. The contagion worked because newspapers, railways and mobile elites carried models of protest. In France, the new republic promised universal male suffrage; in German states, liberal parliaments were demanded; in Italy, Risorgimento linked national unity to constitutional liberty. The immediate consequences were mixed. The revolutions failed to unify Germany and Italy, and the Metternich system collapsed in 1848, though conservative forces restored much of it after 1849. Yet the old order was permanently weakened: constitutional and parliamentary reforms survived in many states, national movements gained momentum, and Marx and Engels’ Communist Manifesto, published in February 1848, gave a socialist response to the revolutionary ferment and class conflict of 1848.

End of Apartheid. Apartheid, made official policy in 1948, denied natives fundamental rights through racial segregation, pass laws, restricted voting and forced removals. The Group Areas Act and pass laws made daily life a site of racial control. It ended because internal mass mobilization and international pressure made the regime’s cost of rule unsustainable, while elite negotiation provided a way out. The ANC, formed in 1912, led the Defiance Campaign; Sharpeville in 1960 radicalized the struggle; Soweto in 1976 exposed the brutality of the system, though the deeper ungovernability emerged from the mass democratic movement of the 1980s, when strikes, boycotts and civic resistance paralysed townships. International isolation mattered: South Africa withdrew from the Commonwealth in 1961, the UN Security Council adopted arms embargoes—voluntary in 1963 and mandatory in 1977—and India, which had raised racial discrimination against Indians in South Africa at the UN General Assembly in 1946, supported anti-apartheid pressure in multilateral forums. The pressure was not merely diplomatic: multilateral and national trade measures, alongside the arms embargoes, compounded the isolation. Finally, Mandela’s release in 1990 and CODESA negotiations allowed the ANC, NP and other parties to agree on a transitional rule: the Interim Constitution of 1993, a transitional executive, and a 1994 universal franchise.

Thus the Enlightenment’s “enlightened” contribution was the universal claim of reason and rights. That claim powered 1848, and later, in South Africa, it helped turn anti-colonial and anti-apartheid resistance into a negotiated democratic transition. This continuum shows that Enlightenment ideas did not automatically produce democracy; they supplied the language of rights that movements could adapt to local conditions and thereby made transition possible.

(a) What was "enlightened" about the Age of Enlightenment? (20 marks) (b) What were the causes and consequences of the…

Model answer

What "Explain" is asking you to do

Structure that answers it

Where marks are lost

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Key points expected

Evaluation rubric

Must cover

Loses marks

Earns more

Extra mark

Must cover

Loses marks

Earns more

Extra mark

Must cover

Loses marks

Earns more

Extra mark

Practice this exact question

More from History 2021 Paper II