History 2021 Paper II 50 marks 150 words Compulsory Critically examine

Paper II — Q5

(a) There were many reasons why the industrial revolution first happened in England. (10 marks) (b) Napoleon's continental…

Critically examine the following statements in about 150 words each:

(a)

There were many reasons why the industrial revolution first happened in England. 10 marks

(b)

Napoleon's continental system may be reckoned as the greatest blunder and may be described as a "monument of misdirected energy". 10 marks

(c)

The Chartist Movement failed to achieve its stated objectives, but succeeded in seeding the idea that a representative democracy should include all citizens. 10 marks

(d)

During the Cold War, some important leaders of the Non-Aligned Movement wanted to keep the movement away from the military blocs. 10 marks

(e)

The Arab countries looked up to Nasser as a leader who could withstand the pressure exerted by Western countries on Egypt to make peace with Israel. 10 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

निम्नलिखित कथनों में से प्रत्येक का लगभग 150 शब्दों में समालोचनात्मक परीक्षण कीजिए :

(a)

इस बात के कई कारण थे जिनकी वजह से औद्योगिक क्रांति पहले इंग्लैंड में हुई । (10 अंक)

(b)

नेपोलियन की महाद्वीपीय व्यवस्था को सबसे बड़ी भूल माना जा सकता है तथा इसे "गलत निर्देशित ऊर्जा के स्मारक" के रूप में वर्णित किया जा सकता है । (10 अंक)

(c)

चार्टिस्ट आंदोलन अपने घोषित उद्देश्यों को प्राप्त करने में असफल रहा, परंतु इस विचार का बीजारोपण करने में सफल रहा कि प्रतिनिधिक प्रजातंत्र में सभी नागरिकों को शामिल किया जाना चाहिए । (10 अंक)

(d)

शीत युद्ध के दौरान, गुट-निरपेक्ष आंदोलन के कुछ महत्वपूर्ण नेता इस आंदोलन को सैन्य गुटों से दूर रखना चाहते थे । (10 अंक)

(e)

अरब देशों ने नासिर को ऐसे नेता के रूप में देखा जो उस दबाव के सामने खड़ा रह सकता था जो पश्चिमी देश, मिस्र पर इज़राइल के साथ शांति बनाने के लिए डाल रहे थे । (10 अंक)

Q5 of the 2021 UPSC Mains History Paper II, as printed
The question as printed in the 2021 History paper

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the 150-word length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

(a) Why the Industrial Revolution began in England

Several factors converged. The agricultural revolution raised food output and released labour through enclosures. Capital was available from trade, colonial profits and banks, and the Bank of England and country banks supplied credit. Coal and iron lay close together, and the canals and ports gave cheap transport. A stable parliamentary state protected property and patents after 1688, with no internal customs barriers. Colonies and sea power gave raw cotton, markets and shipping. A culture of practical science supported inventors such as Kay, Hargreaves, Arkwright, Crompton, Watt and Cort, and a rising population and domestic demand supported expansion. Together these made England's textile, iron and steam industries lead the world, though some of the factors, such as colonial gains, are debated by historians.

(b) Napoleon's Continental System

Through the Berlin (1806) and Milan (1807) decrees Napoleon sought to ruin Britain by closing continental ports to British goods. The result was largely a blunder, though not the only one. British naval supremacy at Trafalgar allowed Britain to trade elsewhere, and its Orders in Council blockaded Europe in return. Smuggling flourished, and the system hurt France and its allies more, causing shortages and discontent. It drew Napoleon into the Peninsular War (1808) to enforce it in Portugal and Spain, and into invading Russia in 1812 after Tsar Alexander withdrew. It did give some boost to continental industry. Yet the fair summary is that it was an overreach, which drained resources and hastened Napoleon's fall.

(c) The Chartist movement

Chartism arose from the People's Charter (1838) of the London Working Men's Association, demanding six points: universal manhood suffrage, secret ballot, equal constituencies, annual parliaments, payment of MPs and abolition of the property qualification. Petitions in 1839, 1842 and 1848 were rejected, and the movement was split between moral force and physical force and faded after 1848, so it failed in its immediate aims.

But it succeeded in establishing the idea that working men belonged in political life. Over time, five of the six points came into law: secret ballot (1872), abolition of property qualification (1858), payment of MPs (1911) and widening of the franchise through the Reform Acts of 1867, 1884 and later, and universal adult suffrage in 1918 and 1928. Annual parliaments alone did not.

(d) Non-Aligned leaders and military blocs

The statement is substantially true. Nehru, Tito, Nasser, Sukarno and Nkrumah, founders of NAM (Belgrade, 1961), wished to stay outside the military alliances such as NATO, the Warsaw Pact and the Baghdad Pact and SEATO, believing alliance dragged weak states into Cold War conflicts, and Nehru's Panchsheel and peaceful coexistence expressed this. They criticised foreign bases and the arms race, and sought autonomy in foreign policy.

Not all members agreed: some members such as Pakistan, Iran and Turkey were in alliances, and Cuba under Castro argued at the 1979 Havana summit that NAM was a natural ally of the Soviet bloc, which Tito and others opposed. Hence the founding leaders held to distance from blocs but the movement was never uniform.

(e) Nasser and Western pressure

The statement is largely accurate. After the 1952 revolution, Nasser became the main figure of Arab nationalism by opposing Western-led security pacts such as the Baghdad Pact (1955), buying arms from Czechoslovakia (1955), and refusing to be dictated to. When the US and Britain withdrew funding for the Aswan High Dam, he nationalised the Suez Canal in July 1956. Britain, France and Israel attacked in October, but US and Soviet pressure forced them to withdraw, which made Nasser a hero across the Arab world.

He rejected peace with Israel on Western terms, and championed Pan-Arabism and the Palestinian cause, though the defeat of 1967 damaged his standing.

How this answer will be evaluated

Framework: Context > Thesis > Evidence > Historiography

What earns full marks: Thesis-driven, cites specific historians/sources, critiques the statement with evidence, and provides a reasoned judgment.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) Critically examine why the Industrial Revolution first happened in England. 10 marks · 150 words

    critique— the claim → its strengths → its weaknesses → your judgment

    Must cover

    • Agrarian change, capital and banking
    • Coal, iron, transport and stable state
    • Colonies, markets, inventions and demand

    Loses marks

    • List of inventions with no causes
    • Second Industrial Revolution discussed instead

    Earns more

    • Named inventors and inventions
    • Historians' debate on weight of colonial gains

    Extra mark

    • Comparison with France or the Netherlands
  2. (b) Critically examine whether Napoleon's Continental System was the greatest blunder and a monument of misdirected energy. 10 marks · 150 words

    critique— the claim → its strengths → its weaknesses → your judgment

    Must cover

    • Aims and decrees: Berlin (1806) and Milan (1807)
    • Reasons for failure: British naval supremacy, smuggling, harm to Europe
    • Consequences: Peninsular War, Russia in 1812, Napoleon's fall

    Loses marks

    • Only the Napoleonic wars narrated
    • No judgement on the quoted description

    Earns more

    • Britain's Orders in Council
    • Some benefit to continental industry

    Extra mark

    • Other blunders such as the Russian campaign
  3. (c) Critically examine the claim that the Chartist Movement failed in its stated objectives but succeeded in seeding the idea of representative democracy for all citizens. 10 marks · 150 words

    critique— the claim → its strengths → its weaknesses → your judgment

    Must cover

    • Six points of the People's Charter and the petitions
    • Reasons for the failure by 1848
    • Later realisation of most points and widening franchise

    Loses marks

    • Points of the Charter listed wrongly
    • No assessment of long-term impact

    Earns more

    • Dates of reform acts
    • Moral force and physical force split

    Extra mark

    • Roles of Lovett and O'Connor
  4. (d) Critically examine the statement that some important leaders of the Non-Aligned Movement wanted to keep the movement away from military blocs. 10 marks · 150 words

    critique— the claim → its strengths → its weaknesses → your judgment

    Must cover

    • Founders Nehru, Tito, Nasser, Sukarno, Nkrumah and the Belgrade summit
    • Rejection of NATO, Warsaw Pact and other alliances, and reasons
    • Disagreements within the movement such as Cuba's view

    Loses marks

    • NAM described as neutral or isolationist
    • Wrong founders or date

    Earns more

    • Panchsheel and peaceful coexistence
    • Alliance-member participants such as Pakistan

    Extra mark

    • Havana summit of 1979
  5. (e) Critically examine the statement that the Arab countries looked up to Nasser as a leader who could withstand Western pressure on Egypt to make peace with Israel. 10 marks · 150 words

    critique— the claim → its strengths → its weaknesses → your judgment

    Must cover

    • Nasser's rise and opposition to Western pacts and arms dependence
    • Suez nationalisation and the 1956 crisis ending in withdrawal
    • Pan-Arabism and rejection of peace on Western terms, with limits after 1967

    Loses marks

    • Only the Suez events described
    • Arab-Israeli wars confused

    Earns more

    • Aswan Dam funding withdrawal
    • Role of US and USSR pressure in 1956

    Extra mark

    • Contrast with Sadat's peace
What "Critically examine" is asking you to do

Test the proposition the question puts to you and return a finding on how far it holds. Examine stems carry a claim, or ask whether something has happened, and expect evidence weighed both ways before the extent is stated — often with remedial measures attached. “Critically” is not a section added at the end: name the yardstick you are judging by — the evidence, the stated objective, a constitutional principle, a rival explanation — and let a verdict close each part of the body. Where the question quotes a claim, that verdict must land on the claim itself, accepted, qualified or rejected, and not on the theme in general.

Structure that answers it

Restate the claim as the question frames it → evidence that supports it → evidence that undercuts it → the conditions under which it holds → verdict on how far it stands

Where marks are lost

Merits in one paragraph, demerits in the next, and a conclusion calling for a balanced and holistic approach. That is a survey with the judgement left out and it holds the answer in the middle band. The opposite error is reading “critically” as permission to attack — and with the odd pairings, critically describe or critically explain, the exposition still carries most of the marks, the judgement being a layer on it rather than a substitute for it.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from History 2021 Paper II

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in