(a) Do you understand that the lack of statesmanship in London during the 1760's and the 1770's was, an important contributory factor in precipitating the American Revolution. Analyse. (20 marks)
(b) Discuss, how the policies adopted by Mikhail Gorba

Question

(a) Do you understand that the lack of statesmanship in London during the 1760's and the 1770's was, an important contributory factor in precipitating the American Revolution. Analyse. (20 marks)
(b) Discuss, how the policies adopted by Mikhail Gorbachev were responsible for the disintegration of the USSR ? (20 marks)
(c) What happened to Malaya after it was liberated from Japanese occupation in 1945 ? Discuss. (10 marks)

UPSC Answer Check · Accepted Answer

American Revolution. The Revolution was not caused by one grievance but by London’s failure to govern an Atlantic empire flexibly. Under Walpole, salutary neglect had let colonial assemblies develop self-government. After the Seven Years’ War, post-war finance and imperial anxiety produced sharper assertiveness. The Stamp Act 1765, introduced under the Grenville ministry, taxed internal colonial transactions and provoked “no taxation without representation.” Its repeal showed London could yield, but the Declaratory Act preserved Parliament’s claim to legislate, leaving the constitutional question unresolved. The Townshend Acts 1767, shaped by Townshend as Chancellor of the Exchequer under Chatham and later Grafton, imposed import duties and reinforced customs control, while the Coercive Acts 1774, under the North ministry, punished Massachusetts after the Boston Tea Party and closed Boston’s port. These measures signalled that colonial elites could be governed without consent. The statesmanship deficit lay in confusing sovereignty with domination. London rejected conciliatory proposals associated with Chatham and Burke, who argued for restoring trust through recognition of colonial rights, and mishandled the Boston Tea Party by treating protest as rebellion. Inflexible policy radicalised moderate merchants; radicalisation forced harsher coercion; coercion made reconciliation impossible. Thus the lack of statesmanship was an important contributory factor, though not the sole cause, because it converted economic and constitutional disputes into revolution.

Gorbachev and the USSR. Gorbachev’s reforms transformed a managed system into one that could no longer contain its contradictions. Perestroika sought economic restructuring through limited market incentives and decentralisation, but failed to deliver growth, exposed shortages and created uncertainty. Glasnost opened political discussion and released suppressed national grievances in the Baltic states, Ukraine, Georgia and the Caucasus. Demokratizatsiya, including multi-candidate elections and weakening the CPSU monopoly, undermined the party’s capacity to coordinate the union. The Sinatra Doctrine, abandoning the Brezhnev Doctrine, allowed Eastern European states to choose their own paths and removed the threat of Soviet intervention that had held the bloc together. Poland’s round-table transition, Hungary’s opening and the fall of the Berlin Wall showed reform could not be reversed without legitimacy. The unintended consequences were decisive: the August 1991 coup discredited the old nomenklatura, accelerated Yeltsin’s rise and made the centre appear weak. Baltic independence declarations in 1990–91, followed by other republics, turned constitutional reform into secession. Unlike the Chinese Communist Party, which suppressed the 1989 Tiananmen protests and retained authoritarian control while pursuing economic reform, Gorbachev chose openness over coercion. That preserved political legitimacy in the short term but made disintegration probable.

Malaya after 1945. Liberation from Japanese occupation did not restore the pre-war order. The British Military Administration, 1945–46, struggled with shortages, labour unrest and the re-emergence of the Malayan Communist Party, which had fought the Japanese and now challenged British authority. The MCP’s armed resistance, especially after the killing of British police in 1948, led to the declaration of a state of emergency. The Briggs Plan, with its “long dike” strategy, resettled rural populations into new villages, cut off guerrilla support, and combined military operations with political and economic measures. The emergency weakened the MCP but deepened communal tensions and exposed the limits of colonial rule. The path to Merdeka in 1957 was therefore a negotiated settlement: Britain conceded independence to a Malay-led coalition while retaining security and economic interests. Across all three cases, imperial overreach met local mobilisation. In America, colonial elites used constitutional language; in the USSR, national parties and popular movements used Gorbachev’s openness; in Malaya, anti-colonial and communist forces forced transition. The lesson is that empires decline not only when weak, but when they fail to adapt governance to the political realities they create.

(a) Do you understand that the lack of statesmanship in London during the 1760's and the 1770's was, an important contributory…

Model answer

What "Analyse" is asking you to do

Structure that answers it

Where marks are lost

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Key points expected

Evaluation rubric

Must cover

Loses marks

Earns more

Extra mark

Must cover

Loses marks

Earns more

Extra mark

Must cover

Loses marks

Earns more

Extra mark

Practice this exact question

More from History 2022 Paper II