History 2023 Paper I 50 marks Discuss
Q6
(a) Discuss the role of Nur Jahan in the Mughal court politics during the reign of Jahangir. (20 marks) (b) Why did Balban prefer 'consolidation' over 'expansion' of the Delhi Sultanate? (15 marks) (c) What features of European paintings were incorporated in the Mughal miniature painting? (15 marks)
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a) जहाँगीर के शासनकाल में मुगल दरबार की नीतियों में नूरजहाँ की भूमिका का विवेचन कीजिए। (20 अंक) (b) बलबन ने दिल्ली सल्तनत के लिए 'विस्तारित करने' के स्थान पर 'संमेकित करने' की नीति क्यों चुनी थी? (15 अंक) (c) मुगल लघु चित्रकला में यूरोपीय चित्रकला की किन विशेषताओं का समावेश हुआ था? (15 अंक)
Directive word: Discuss
This question asks you to discuss. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.
See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
The directive 'discuss' in part (a) requires a balanced examination of Nur Jahan's political role with evidence, while parts (b) and (c) demand explanatory and descriptive treatment respectively. Allocate approximately 40% of time/words to part (a) given its 20 marks, and roughly 30% each to parts (b) and (c). Structure with a brief composite introduction, three distinct sections for each sub-part with clear sub-headings, and a synthesizing conclusion that connects themes of statecraft and cultural synthesis across the periods.
Key points expected
- Part (a): Nur Jahan's political ascendancy (1611 onwards), her coinage (Nur Jahan's coins), administrative interventions, role in succession struggles (Shahryar vs. Khurram), and the 'Junta' theory vs. modern revisionist views
- Part (a): The Nur Jahan Junta—her father's elevation (Itimad-ud-Daulah), brother Asaf Khan's role, and assessment of whether she exercised 'de facto' sovereignty or shared authority
- Part (b): Balban's consolidation policy—destruction of the Chalisa/forty nobles, reconstruction of the iqta system, espionage network (barid), and doctrine of kingship (Niyamat-i-Khudai)
- Part (b): Contextual factors—Mongol threat (Sitr-i-Mughuli), internal rebellions (Tughril Khan of Bengal), fragile Sultanate foundations, and comparison with aggressive predecessors (Iltutmish vs. Balban)
- Part (c): European influences in Mughal painting—linear perspective, chiaroscuro/shading, naturalistic portraiture, European motifs (angels, putti, halos), and specific artists (Jesuit missionaries at Akbar's court, Manohar, Abu'l Hasan)
- Part (c): Specific works demonstrating synthesis—Jahangir holding picture of Madonna, Dastan-i-Amir Hamza illustrations, and the distinction between decorative borrowing vs. structural integration
Evaluation rubric
| Dimension | Weight | Max marks | Excellent | Average | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chronology accuracy | 20% | 10 | Precise dating for all three parts: Nur Jahan's marriage (1611), peak influence (1614-1622), and death (1645); Balban's reign (1266-1287) with correct sequencing of reforms; Mughal-European contact phases (Akbar 1580s, Jahangir 1605-1627) with accurate attribution of artistic developments to specific reigns | Broadly correct century placement with minor errors (e.g., Jahangir-Nur Jahan period misplaced by 5-10 years; Balban's reforms undated; vague 'Mughal period' for painting without reign-specific attribution) | Serious anachronisms (Nur Jahan placed in Shah Jahan's reign; Balban confused with Alauddin Khalji; European influence attributed to Humayun's pre-Mughal period or missing entirely) |
| Source & evidence | 20% | 10 | Deploys primary sources effectively: Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri for Nur Jahan's political role; Barani's Tarikh-i-Firuzshahi for Balban's policies; Abul Fazl's Ain-i-Akbari and contemporary European accounts (Jesuit letters, Roe's embassy) for painting; cites specific historians (Richards, Findly, Beach) where relevant | Mentions generic 'contemporary sources' without specificity; names one or two sources correctly but without integration; conflates primary and secondary sources; uses 'some historians say' without attribution | No source citation; relies on textbook generalizations; invents sources or attributes wrong texts (e.g., citing Baburnama for Jahangir's reign); confuses fictional accounts with historical evidence |
| Multi-perspective analysis | 20% | 10 | For (a): presents both 'petticoat government' critique and feminist revisionism (Findly, Lefevre); for (b): contrasts Balban's conservatism with Khalji expansionism, considers administrative vs. military imperatives; for (c): distinguishes between superficial motif borrowing and deeper stylistic integration, notes regional variations (Mughal vs. Deccan) | Single narrative for each part without tension; acknowledges alternative views superficially ('some say X, others say Y') without evaluation; treats all three parts in isolation without thematic connection | Wholly one-sided treatment; presents stereotypes as fact (Nur Jahan as 'ambitious woman', Balban as 'cruel despot'); no recognition of historiographical debate; conflates all European influences as identical |
| Historiographic framing | 20% | 10 | Demonstrates awareness of evolving interpretations: Nur Jahan studies from Beni Prasad's 'kingmaker' to Lefevre's 'co-sovereignty' to recent gendered analysis; Balban from medieval chronicler praise to modern 'state-building' assessment; Mughal painting from 'decline' narratives to 'creative synthesis' models (Beach, Crill) | Implicit awareness of changing interpretations without explicit framing; mentions one historian per part without connecting to broader shifts; treats current consensus as eternal truth | Completely presentist or anachronistic framing; uses colonial-era stereotypes uncritically; no awareness that interpretations have changed; treats all historians as interchangeable |
| Conclusion & synthesis | 20% | 10 | Synthesizes across all three parts to identify common themes: the tension between personal authority and institutional stability, the role of cultural borrowing in state legitimation, and the gendered/ideological dimensions of medieval Indian political culture; ends with qualified assessment rather than summary | Separate concluding sentences for each part without cross-connection; restates main points without development; generic conclusion about 'importance in Indian history' | No conclusion or abrupt ending; introduces new information in conclusion; contradictory final assessment; conclusion that ignores one or more parts entirely |
Practice this exact question
Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.
Evaluate my answer →More from History 2023 Paper I
- Q1 Identify the following places marked on the map supplied to you and write a short note of about 30 words on each of them in your Question-c…
- Q2 (a) "The Neolithic Age represents a revolution due to significant changes that took place during this period." Examine. (20 marks) (b) The…
- Q3 (a) How far the Sangam literature acts as a window into the social and cultural traditions of ancient South India? (20 marks) (b) Analyze t…
- Q4 (a) Analyze the tenets, spread and impact of the Bhakti Movement. (20 marks) (b) How far temple architecture under the Cholas became more r…
- Q5 Answer the following questions in about 150 words each: (a) Discuss the various proponents of Indian feudalism. (10 marks) (b) Examine the…
- Q6 (a) Discuss the role of Nur Jahan in the Mughal court politics during the reign of Jahangir. (20 marks) (b) Why did Balban prefer 'consolid…
- Q7 (a) The Marathas posed a significant threat to the integrity of the Mughal Empire. Discuss. (20 marks) (b) "Haidar Ali was born to build an…
- Q8 (a) Mughal architecture was syncretic in character. Comment. (20 marks) (b) The economy of India was not stagnant in the eighteenth century…