Q8
(a) (i) "Regional Economic Cooperation can play an important role in India's unfavourable Balance of Trade." Comment. 5 marks (ii) Examine the role of dispute settlement mechanisms in FTAs. How do these mechanisms resolve conflicts and enforce trade agreements ? What are the possible challenges and possible improvements in the existing dispute settlement frameworks ? 10 marks (b) (i) How is Global business strategy different from International, Multinational and Transnational ? Elaborate with suitable examples. 5 marks (ii) Examine the ethical challenges faced by multinational corporations in operating in countries with different legal and ethical standards. Discuss the importance of ethical leadership and corporate governance in international business. 10 marks (c) (i) Examine the effectiveness of different Chambers of Commerce and Industry in India. 10 marks (ii) Discuss the best practices for managing cross-border mergers and acquisitions. What are the lessons learned from successful and unsuccessful cross-border mergers and acquisitions ? 10 marks
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a) (i) "भारत के प्रतिकूल व्यापार संतुलन (बैलेंस ऑफ ट्रेड) में क्षेत्रीय आर्थिक सहयोग एक अहम भूमिका निभा सकता है।" टिप्पणी कीजिए। 5 (ii) एफ.टी.ए. के परिप्रेक्ष्य में विवाद समाधान तंत्र की भूमिका का परीक्षण कीजिए। यह तंत्र किस प्रकार से टकराव निराकरण कर व्यापार समझौतों को बाध्य करता है ? वर्तमान विवाद समाधान ढांचे में कौन-सी संभावित चुनौतियाँ एवं संभावित सुधार हैं ? 10 (b) (i) किस प्रकार वैश्विक व्यवसाय रणनीति, अंतर्राष्ट्रीय, बहुराष्ट्रीय एवं पारराष्ट्रीय (ट्रांसनेशनल) से भिन्न है ? उपयुक्त उदाहरणों सहित विस्तार से बताइए। 5 (ii) बहुराष्ट्रीय कम्पनियों को विभिन्न विधिक एवं नैतिक मानकों को अपनाने वाले देशों में परिचालन करने में सामना करने वाली नैतिक चुनौतियों का परीक्षण कीजिए। अंतर्राष्ट्रीय व्यवसाय में नैतिक नेतृत्व एवं निगमित शासन (कॉर्पोरेट गवर्नेंस) के महत्व पर चर्चा कीजिए। 10 (c) (i) भारत में विभिन्न वाणिज्य एवं उद्योग मंडलों (चैंबर ऑफ कॉमर्स) की प्रभावशीलता का परीक्षण कीजिए । 10 (ii) सीमा-पार विलय एवं अधिग्रहण को प्रबंधित करने वाली श्रेष्ठ (सर्वोत्तम) प्रथाओं की चर्चा कीजिए । सफल एवं असफल सीमा-पार विलय एवं अधिग्रहणों से क्या सबक मिलते हैं ? 10
Directive word: Examine
This question asks you to examine. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.
See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
The directive 'examine' requires critical investigation of multiple dimensions with evidence-based analysis. Structure: Introduction (5%) → Body: (a)(i) Regional cooperation & BoT linkage (10%), (a)(ii) FTA dispute mechanisms with challenges (20%), (b)(i) Strategic typologies with examples (10%), (b)(ii) MNC ethics & governance (20%), (c)(i) Chambers' effectiveness (15%), (c)(ii) Cross-border M&A best practices (15%) → Conclusion with recommendations (5%). Allocate time proportionally to marks: ~12 min for 5-mark parts, ~24 min for 10-mark parts.
Key points expected
- (a)(i) Regional Economic Cooperation's impact on India's trade deficit: ASEAN, SAFTA, RCEP effects on import-export asymmetry; market access vs. import surge dilemma
- (a)(ii) FTA dispute settlement: WTO-style panels, arbitration, appellate review; enforcement through retaliation/suspension; challenges like delays, asymmetrical power, lack of permanent appellate body; reforms needed
- (b)(i) Strategic typologies: Global (standardization, e.g., Apple), International (adaptation, e.g., early HUL), Multinational (multi-domestic, e.g., Nestlé), Transnational (integrated network, e.g., Unilever); I-R framework integration
- (b)(ii) MNC ethical challenges: bribery, labor standards, environmental dumping, tax avoidance; Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, UK Bribery Act, OECD guidelines; ethical leadership through tone-at-top, stakeholder governance
- (c)(i) Chambers' effectiveness: FICCI (policy advocacy), CII (corporate governance standards), ASSOCHAM (MSME focus); limitations in representing fragmented sectors, digital transformation gaps
- (c)(ii) Cross-border M&A best practices: due diligence (cultural, regulatory), integration planning, stakeholder communication; success lessons (Tata-Corus, Sun-Ranbaxy) vs. failures (Vodafone-Idea merger challenges, Tata-Docomo arbitration)
- Synthesis: Interconnection between regional cooperation, dispute resolution, strategic choices, ethical governance, institutional support, and M&A execution in India's international business landscape
Evaluation rubric
| Dimension | Weight | Max marks | Excellent | Average | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concept correctness | 20% | 10 | Precise definitions: BoT vs. BoP for (a)(i); WTO DSU vs. FTA ISDS for (a)(ii); I-R framework integration-responsiveness for (b)(i); ethical relativism vs. absolutism for (b)(ii); distinction between FICCI/CII/ASSOCHAM mandates for (c)(i); synergy vs. integration challenges for (c)(ii). No conceptual conflation between strategic types. | Generally correct definitions but some overlap between multinational/transnational strategies; vague on ISDS vs. state-state dispute settlement; generic chamber descriptions without functional differentiation. | Confuses BoT with BoP; treats all FTAs as identical; fails to distinguish global from transnational; conflates chambers as interchangeable; describes M&A as purely financial without strategic/operational dimensions. |
| Framework citation | 20% | 10 | Bartlett-Ghoshal I-R matrix for (b)(i); Porter's diamond or Dunning's OLI for regional cooperation; WTO DSU Articles 21-22 for enforcement; OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises; UN Global Compact principles; SEBI LODR for governance; Haspeslagh-Jemison integration framework for M&A. | Mentions frameworks without applying them specifically to the context; cites WTO generally without DSU specifics; references ethical codes without naming sources; generic integration approaches for M&A. | No frameworks cited; or completely misapplied frameworks (e.g., SWOT for everything); confuses theoretical models with empirical observations. |
| Case / Indian example | 20% | 10 | India-ASEAN FTA trade deficit data for (a)(i); RCEP exit rationale; India-EU BTIA dispute concerns; Tata Steel-Corus (global), HUL (multinational evolving to transnational), Infosys (international to global) for (b)(i); Vedanta-Cairn or Walmart-FCPA settlement for (b)(ii); specific CII Corporate Governance Awards or FICCI lobbying outcomes for (c)(i); Tata-Corus success factors vs. Vodafone-Idea integration struggles or Flipkart-Walmart cultural challenges for (c)(ii). | Generic MNC examples (Microsoft, McDonald's) without Indian adaptation; mentions chambers without specific initiatives; cites M&A deals without analyzing success/failure factors; outdated or partially accurate case details. | No Indian examples; or factually incorrect cases (e.g., calling Infosys multinational without evolution); irrelevant examples (purely domestic mergers for cross-border question); fabricated case details. |
| Multi-perspective analysis | 20% | 10 | For (a): economic (trade creation/diversion), political (sovereignty costs), legal (enforcement capacity); for (b)(ii): host country, home country, MNC headquarters, subsidiary perspectives; for (c)(ii): acquirer, target, employees, regulators, customers; balances government, business, and civil society viewpoints throughout; acknowledges trade-offs explicitly. | Two perspectives covered adequately (typically government and business); acknowledges multiple stakeholders without deep analysis; some parts stronger than others; descriptive rather than analytical treatment of tensions. | Single perspective dominant (e.g., only government view on FTAs, only MNC view on ethics); no acknowledgment of competing interests; treats complex issues as unidirectional; missing perspectives on highest-mark sub-parts. |
| Conclusion & recommendation | 20% | 10 | Synthesizes across all six sub-parts: links regional cooperation effectiveness to dispute mechanism credibility, strategic choice to ethical governance requirements, chamber modernization to M&A facilitation; specific actionable recommendations (e.g., India-specific ISDS model, mandatory ethics training for board members, chamber digital platforms for due diligence); forward-looking on India's G20 presidency leverage. | Summarizes main points without true synthesis; generic recommendations (improve governance, strengthen institutions); no explicit linkage between sub-parts; predictable conclusion without examiner value-add. | No conclusion or abrupt ending; purely repeats introduction; recommendations unrelated to analysis; missing conclusion for highest-mark sub-parts; no integration across the multi-part structure. |
Practice this exact question
Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.
Evaluate my answer →More from Management 2023 Paper II
- Q1 (a) State the chief characteristics of Index Numbers. (10 marks) (b) What do you mean by Information Resource Management ? State its featur…
- Q2 (a) The following table gives the production in three shifts and the corresponding number of defective goods that turned out in three weeks…
- Q3 (a) State the different forms of waste management. 15 marks (b) State the various factors affecting plant location. 15 marks (c) An automob…
- Q4 (a) (i) Define e-Governance. (ii) State the advantages of e-Governance. (iii) State the e-Governance initiatives. 5+5+5=15 marks (b) (i) De…
- Q5 (a) Examine the impact of privatisation of PSUs on the economic development of India. 10 (b) "A country can truly progress, if there is bal…
- Q6 (a) (i) "The role of Board of Directors is to govern and not to manage." Comment on the statement and bring out the elements of Corporate G…
- Q7 (a) (i) How do companies scan the environment and analyse the same to reset the objectives and formulate strategies ? Explain. 5 marks (ii)…
- Q8 (a) (i) "Regional Economic Cooperation can play an important role in India's unfavourable Balance of Trade." Comment. 5 marks (ii) Examine…