Management 2024 Paper II 50 marks Solve

Paper II — Q2

(a) A company gives on-the-job training to its salesmen, which is followed by a test. The company is considering whether there is…

(a)

A company gives on-the-job training to its salesmen, which is followed by a test. The company is considering whether there is any relationship of test scores and sales performance made by the ten salesmen during last one year, and also whether the company should terminate the services of any salesman who does not perform well in the test:

Test Score50605847503365434668
Sales ('000)48655048555863485070

Give your comment whether the company should terminate the services of any salesman who does not perform well in the test. 15 marks

(b)

A law graduate student randomly guesses at nine multiple-choice questions in All India Bar Examination. There are four possible answers for every question. However there is only one correct answer. Assuming that all questions are independent to each other, find the possibility that the student chooses six correct answers. 15 marks

(c)
(i)

For conducting Third Semester Practical Examination, the Chemistry department of a university affiliated college requires 10, 12 and 7 units of three chemicals X, Y and Z respectively. The chemicals are available in two boxes—box A and box B. Box A contains 3, 2 and 1 unit of X, Y and Z respectively and costs ₹ 300. Box B contains 1, 2 and 2 units of X, Y and Z respectively and costs ₹ 200.

Find how many boxes of each type should be purchased by the department so that the total cost is minimal by formulating the problem in linear programming problem and solve it through graphical method. 18 marks

(ii)

Comment on the sensitivity analysis. 2 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a)

एक कंपनी अपने सेल्समैनों को नौकरी का प्रशिक्षण देती है और फिर एक परीक्षा लेती है। कंपनी यह विचार कर रही है कि क्या पिछले एक साल में दस सेल्समैनों द्वारा बिक्री निष्पादन एवं परीक्षा अंक में कोई सम्बन्ध है और क्या किसी सेल्समैन की परीक्षा में अच्छा प्रदर्शन न करने पर सेवा समाप्त करनी चाहिए:

परीक्षा अंक50605847503365434668
बिक्रय ('000)48655048555863485070

आप अपनी टिप्पणी दीजिए कि क्या कंपनी को किसी सेल्समैन की परीक्षा में अच्छा प्रदर्शन न करने पर सेवा समाप्त करनी चाहिए। 15

(b)

कानून का एक स्नातक विद्यार्थी अखिल भारतीय विधि (बार) परीक्षा में नौ बहुविकल्पी प्रश्नों पर बेतरतीब ढंग से अनुमान लगाता है। हर प्रश्न के चार संभावित उत्तर हैं, तथापि केवल एक ही सही उत्तर है। यह मानते हुए कि सभी प्रश्न एक-दूसरे से स्वतंत्र हैं, विद्यार्थी के छः सही उत्तर चुनने की संभावना ज्ञात कीजिए। 15

(c)
(i)

एक विश्वविद्यालय के सम्बद्ध महाविद्यालय के रसायनशास्त्र विभाग में तृतीय सेमेस्टर की व्यावहारिक परीक्षा के संचालन के लिए तीन रसायन X, Y एवं Z के क्रमशः 10, 12 एवं 7 इकाइयों की जरूरत है। ये रसायन दो तरह के बक्से—बक्सा A और बक्सा B में उपलब्ध हैं। बक्सा A में X, Y और Z के क्रमशः 3, 2 और 1 इकाई उपलब्ध है तथा इसकी कीमत ₹ 300 है। बक्सा B में X, Y और Z के क्रमशः 1, 2 और 2 इकाइयाँ उपलब्ध हैं और इसकी कीमत ₹ 200 है।

इस समस्या का सूत्रीकरण रैखिक प्रोग्रामिंग (लिनियर प्रोग्रामिंग) समस्या से करके ज्ञात कीजिए कि विभाग को न्यूनतम कुल लागत पर हर प्रकार के कितने बक्से खरीदने पड़ेंगे। इसका हल ग्राफिकल विधि से कीजिए। 18

(ii)

संवेदनशीलता विश्लेषण पर टिप्पणी कीजिए। 2

Q2 of the 2024 UPSC Mains Management Paper II, as printed
The question as printed in the 2024 Management paper

Model answer

Written by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key.

(a) Using Karl Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient, let X = test score and Y = sales ('000). For n = 10: ΣX = 520, ΣY = 555, ΣX² = 28076, ΣY² = 31395, ΣXY = 29339. Means: X̄ = 52, Ȳ = 55.5. r = (nΣXY − ΣXΣY) / √[(nΣX² − (ΣX)²)(nΣY² − (ΣY)²)]. nΣXY = 293390, ΣXΣY = 288600, so numerator = 4790. nΣX² − (ΣX)² = 280760 − 270400 = 10360. nΣY² − (ΣY)² = 313950 − 308025 = 5925. Denominator = √(10360 × 5925) = √61,383,000 = 7834.73. r = 4790/7834.73 = 0.6114, i.e. r = 479/√613830 ≈ 0.611. This is a moderate positive relationship. r² = 0.374, so test score explains about 37.4% of variation in sales. For n = 10, the 5% two-tail critical r ≈ 0.632; here r = 0.611, so it is not statistically significant at 5%. Also, a salesman with test score 33 had sales 58, showing poor test performance does not necessarily mean poor sales. Hence the company should not terminate any salesman solely because of poor test performance. The test may be used for training, counselling, probation, and re-testing, along with actual sales records.

(b) This is a binomial distribution problem. Let X = number of correct guesses. Here n = 9, p = 1/4, q = 3/4. P(X = 6) = C(9,6)(1/4)⁶(3/4)³. C(9,6) = C(9,3) = 84. P = 84 × (1/4)⁶ × (3/4)³ = 84 × 27/4⁹ = 2268/262144 = 567/65536 ≈ 0.00865. So the probability is 567/65536 ≈ 0.865%, assuming independent questions and constant p = 1/4.

(c)(i) Let x = number of boxes of type A and y = number of boxes of type B. The LPP is: Minimize C = 300x + 200y subject to 3x + y ≥ 10 (chemical X) 2x + 2y ≥ 12, i.e. x + y ≥ 6 (chemical Y) x + 2y ≥ 7 (chemical Z) x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0; x, y integers.

Graphical method: the boundary lines are: 3x + y = 10: intercepts (10/3, 0), (0, 10) x + y = 6: intercepts (6, 0), (0, 6) x + 2y = 7: intercepts (7, 0), (0, 3.5).

The feasible region lies above all three lines. Key intersections: 3x + y = 10 and x + y = 6 give 2x = 4, so x = 2, y = 4. Check Z: 2 + 2(4) = 10 ≥ 7. Feasible. C = 300(2) + 200(4) = ₹1400. 3x + y = 10 and x + 2y = 7 give x = 13/5, y = 11/5, but x + y = 24/5 = 4.8 < 6, so not feasible. x + y = 6 and x + 2y = 7 give y = 1, x = 5. Feasible. C = 300(5) + 200(1) = ₹1700. Other boundary points: (0,10) gives C = ₹2000; (7,0) gives C = ₹2100.

The minimum occurs at (2, 4). Check: X = 3(2) + 1(4) = 10; Y = 2(2) + 2(4) = 12; Z = 1(2) + 2(4) = 10 ≥ 7. Therefore, the department should buy 2 boxes of A and 4 boxes of B, with minimum cost ₹1400.

(c)(ii) Sensitivity analysis studies how changes in costs or requirements affect the optimum. Here X and Y constraints are binding, while Z has surplus 10 − 7 = 3 units and zero shadow price. From dual/complementary slackness, with Z slack, shadow prices are ₹50 per extra unit of X and ₹75 per extra unit of Y. Thus small increases in X or Y raise minimum cost, but up to 3 extra units of Z cost nothing. If cost coefficients or requirements change beyond allowable ranges, the optimal mix may change.

What "Solve" is asking you to do

Choose the method, then carry it through to a final answer. Identifying what kind of problem this is and why that method applies is the first thing marked; a correct figure arrived at invisibly earns almost nothing.

Structure that answers it

Given data and what is required → method chosen, with the reason it applies → set-up (equation, circuit, free body, trial balance) → working, step by step → answer with units and any condition of validity

Where marks are lost

Doing the middle steps mentally and writing only the result. In mathematics papers, a further loss comes from giving a decimal where the exact value in surds or fractions was wanted, or from skipping the justification a part explicitly asks for.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Framework: null. (a) comment: context > arguments both sides > judgment > close | (b) calculate: given > formula > substitution > result with units > interpretation | (c(i)) calculate: given > formula > substitution > result with units > interpretation | (c(ii)) comment: context > arguments both sides > judgment > close Full marks: Accurate calculations, clear graphical solution, and logical statistical interpretation.

Key points expected

  • Calculate correlation coefficient (Pearson's r)
  • Test significance of correlation (t-test)
  • State conclusion on relationship strength
  • Provide verdict on termination policy
  • Identify Binomial distribution parameters (n=9, p=0.25)
  • Apply binomial probability formula
  • Calculate combination term C(9,6)
  • Provide final numerical probability

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) Statistical analysis of relationship between test scores and sales to justify termination policy. 15 marks

    comment— context → arguments both sides → judgment → close

    Must cover

    • Calculate correlation coefficient (Pearson's r)
    • Test significance of correlation (t-test)
    • State conclusion on relationship strength
    • Provide verdict on termination policy

    Loses marks

    • Verdict without statistical evidence
    • Calculation errors in means or deviations

    Earns more

    • Mention coefficient of determination (r²)
    • Discuss limitations of correlation (causation)

    Extra mark

    • Scatter plot visualization
  2. (b) Probability of exactly 6 correct answers in 9 independent multiple-choice questions. 15 marks

    calculate— given → formula → substitution → result with units → interpretation

    Must cover

    • Identify Binomial distribution parameters (n=9, p=0.25)
    • Apply binomial probability formula
    • Calculate combination term C(9,6)
    • Provide final numerical probability

    Loses marks

    • Using wrong probability p (e.g., 0.5)
    • Arithmetic errors in factorial calculation

    Earns more

    • Show step-by-step substitution
    • State assumptions of independence

    Extra mark

    • Comparison with expected value
  3. (c(i)) Formulate and solve Linear Programming Problem to minimize cost of chemical boxes. 18 marks

    calculate— given → formula → substitution → result with units → interpretation

    Must cover

    • Define decision variables (x, y)
    • Formulate objective function (Min Z = 300x + 200y)
    • Formulate constraints for X, Y, Z chemicals
    • Solve using graphical method (plot lines, find feasible region)

    Loses marks

    • Incorrect inequality signs in constraints
    • Failure to identify optimal corner point

    Earns more

    • Identify corner points of feasible region
    • Evaluate objective function at vertices

    Extra mark

    • Sensitivity analysis on constraints
  4. (c(ii)) Brief analysis of sensitivity of the optimal solution to changes in parameters. 2 marks

    comment— context → arguments both sides → judgment → close

    Must cover

    • Mention effect of changing objective coefficients
    • Mention effect of changing constraint limits

    Loses marks

    • Generic statement without linking to LPP

    Earns more

    • Reference to shadow prices

    Extra mark

    • Specific numerical range for stability

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Management 2024 Paper II