Mathematics 2021 Paper II 50 marks Prove

Paper II — Q3

(a) Let f be an entire function whose Taylor series expansion with centre z = 0 has infinitely many terms. Show that z = 0 is an…

(a)

Let f be an entire function whose Taylor series expansion with centre z = 0 has infinitely many terms. Show that z = 0 is an essential singularity of f(1/z). 15 marks

(b)

Find the stationary values of x² + y² + z² subject to the conditions ax² + by² + cz² = 1 and lx + my + nz = 0. Interpret the result geometrically. 20 marks

(c)

Convert the following LPP into dual LPP : Minimize Z = x₁ - 3x₂ - 2x₃ subject to 3x₁ - x₂ + 2x₃ ≤ 7 2x₁ - 4x₂ ≥ 12 -4x₁ + 3x₂ + 8x₃ = 10 where x₁, x₂ ≥ 0 and x₃ is unrestricted in sign. 15 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a)

मान लीजिए कि f एक सर्वत्र वैश्लेषिक फलन है जिसके केन्द्र z = 0 पर टेलर श्रेणी प्रसार में अपरिमित रूप से अनेक पद हैं। दर्शाइए कि f(1/z) की z = 0 एक अनिवार्य विचित्रता है। (15 अंक)

(b)

शर्तों ax² + by² + cz² = 1 तथा lx + my + nz = 0 से प्रतिबंधित x² + y² + z² के स्थाय (अचर) मान निकालिए। परिणाम की ज्यामितीय व्याख्या कीजिए। (20 अंक)

(c)

निम्न रैखिक प्रोग्राम समस्या को द्वैती रैखिक प्रोग्राम समस्या में परिवर्तित कीजिए : न्यूनतमीकरण कीजिए Z = x₁ - 3x₂ - 2x₃ बशर्ते कि 3x₁ - x₂ + 2x₃ ≤ 7 2x₁ - 4x₂ ≥ 12 -4x₁ + 3x₂ + 8x₃ = 10 जहाँ x₁, x₂ ≥ 0 तथा x₃ का चिह्न अप्रतिबंधित है। (15 अंक)

Q3 of the 2021 UPSC Mains Mathematics Paper II, as printed
The question as printed in the 2021 Mathematics paper

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

(a) z = 0 is an essential singularity of f(1/z)

Since f is entire, f(w) = Σₙ≥0 aₙwⁿ for all w, with aₙ ≠ 0 for infinitely many n. For z ≠ 0,

g(z) = f(1/z) = Σₙ≥0 aₙz⁻ⁿ,

which is the Laurent expansion of g about z = 0 (it converges for all z ≠ 0). Its principal part contains the infinitely many non-zero terms aₙz⁻ⁿ.

If z = 0 were removable, the principal part would vanish, so aₙ = 0 for all n ≥ 1. If z = 0 were a pole of order m, aₙ = 0 for all n > m. Both contradict the hypothesis. By uniqueness of the Laurent expansion, z = 0 is an essential singularity of f(1/z). ∎

(b) Stationary values of x² + y² + z² under ax² + by² + cz² = 1 and lx + my + nz = 0

Let S = x² + y² + z² and use L = S − λ(ax² + by² + cz² − 1) − 2ν(lx + my + nz). Setting the partial derivatives to zero:

(1 − λa)x = νl, (1 − λb)y = νm, (1 − λc)z = νn.

Multiplying by x, y, z and adding, S − λ(ax² + by² + cz²) = ν(lx + my + nz) = 0, so S = λ: the multiplier equals the stationary value.

Substituting x = νl/(1 − λa) etc. in lx + my + nz = 0 (ν ≠ 0 for a non-trivial point):

l²/(1 − λa) + m²/(1 − λb) + n²/(1 − λc) = 0.

Clearing denominators, with P = l² + m² + n², Q = l²(b + c) + m²(c + a) + n²(a + b), R = l²bc + m²ca + n²ab:

Rλ² − Qλ + P = 0, so λ = [Q ± √(Q² − 4PR)]/(2R).

Geometric meaning: the plane lx + my + nz = 0 through the origin cuts the quadric ax² + by² + cz² = 1 in a central conic. S is the squared distance of a point of the conic from its centre, so its two stationary values λ₁, λ₂ are the squares of the semi-axes of the conic; the semi-axes are √λ₁ and √λ₂. For a, b, c > 0 the section is an ellipse and both roots are positive.

(c) Dual of the linear programme

Primal: minimise Z = x₁ − 3x₂ − 2x₃ subject to 3x₁ − x₂ + 2x₃ ≤ 7, 2x₁ − 4x₂ ≥ 12, −4x₁ + 3x₂ + 8x₃ = 10; x₁, x₂ ≥ 0, x₃ unrestricted.

Write the first constraint as −3x₁ + x₂ − 2x₃ ≥ −7, so all inequalities are of the ≥ type. Attach y₁ ≥ 0, y₂ ≥ 0 to the two inequalities and y₃ (unrestricted) to the equation.

Dual: maximise W = −7y₁ + 12y₂ + 10y₃ subject to

−3y₁ + 2y₂ − 4y₃ ≤ 1 (for x₁ ≥ 0), y₁ − 4y₂ + 3y₃ ≤ −3 (for x₂ ≥ 0), −2y₁ + 8y₃ = −2 (x₃ is unrestricted, so an equation),

with y₁ ≥ 0, y₂ ≥ 0 and y₃ unrestricted.

How this answer will be evaluated

What earns full marks: Rigorous proofs with all steps shown, correct geometric interpretation, and flawless dual conversion.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) Show z = 0 is an essential singularity of f(1/z). 15 marks

    justify— claim → 3-4 reasons → evidence → conclusion

    Must cover

    • Write f(1/z) = Σ aₙz⁻ⁿ as the Laurent series
    • Rule out removable singularity and pole using infinitely many non-zero aₙ
    • Conclude essential singularity

    Loses marks

    • Assuming the result
    • Omitting the pole case

    Earns more

    • Uniqueness of Laurent expansion

    Extra mark

    • Casorati–Weierstrass remark
  2. (b) Find stationary values of x² + y² + z² under the two constraints and interpret. 20 marks

    calculate— given → formula → substitution → result with units → interpretation

    Must cover

    • Lagrange conditions and S = λ
    • Condition l²/(1−λa) + m²/(1−λb) + n²/(1−λc) = 0 giving Rλ² − Qλ + P = 0
    • Geometric meaning: squares of the semi-axes of the central section

    Loses marks

    • Missing second constraint multiplier
    • No geometric interpretation

    Earns more

    • Correct P, Q, R
    • Statement that the section is an ellipse for positive a, b, c

    Extra mark

    • Numerical check
  3. (c) Convert the LPP into its dual. 15 marks

    derive— given → assumptions → stepwise derivation → result → check

    Must cover

    • Put all inequalities in ≥ form and attach y₁, y₂ ≥ 0, y₃ free
    • Dual objective max −7y₁ + 12y₂ + 10y₃
    • Dual constraints: two ≤ constraints and one equation for the free variable

    Loses marks

    • Wrong sign conventions for the ≤ constraint
    • Making the equation an inequality

    Earns more

    • Correct treatment of sign restrictions on x₁, x₂, x₃
What "Prove" is asking you to do

Establish that the statement holds for every case it claims, not for one representative case. The argument must be closed: each line follows from a definition, a hypothesis, or a named theorem you are entitled to use.

Structure that answers it

Given and to prove, restated → theorem or construction to be used, named → the argument line by line → conclusion stated as proved

Where marks are lost

Testing one example, which illustrates but proves nothing. On an if and only if claim, proving one direction and stopping forfeits that half outright, and degenerate cases — zero, the empty set, the equality case — have to be disposed of rather than assumed away.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Mathematics 2021 Paper II

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in