Medical Science 2021 Paper II 50 marks Describe

Q3

(a) A 40-year-old male who was bedridden for the last two months following a fracture in the lower limb developed sudden breathlessness. (i) What is the most probable diagnosis ? (ii) How will you investigate the case ? (iii) How will you manage the case ? (2+8+10=20 marks) (b) A term neonate born to 'O' negative blood group mother was found to have deep jaundice involving palms and soles, excessive crying and convulsions at 20 hours of life. (i) How would you assess the clinical severity of jaundice in this neonate ? (ii) List the key investigations to arrive at the diagnosis. (iii) Describe the management of this neonate. (3+4+8=15 marks) (c) (i) Give the clinical findings of lichen planus at the following sites : - Nails - Scalp - Mucosa - Palms and Soles (ii) State the histopathological findings of oral lichen planus. (iii) Discuss the management of oral lichen planus. (5+5+5=15 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) एक 40-वर्षीय पुरुष जो अधःशाखा के अस्थिभंग के कारण विगत दो माह से शय्याप्रस्त था, उसका अचानक ही दम फूलने लगा । (i) सर्वाधिक संभावित निदान क्या है ? (ii) इस मामले की जाँच आप कैसे करेंगे ? (iii) इस मामले का प्रबंधन आप कैसे करेंगे ? 2+8+10=20 (b) एक 'ओ' नैगेटिव रक्त वर्ग की माता के गर्भ से पूर्ण अवधि पर जन्मे नवजात की हथेलियों और तलवों पर तीव्र कामला है, नवजात अत्यधिक रो रहा है और उसे जीवन के 20वें घंटे में आक्षेप हुआ है । (i) इस नवजात में रोगलाक्षणिक आधार पर आप कामला की तीव्रता का कैसे आकलन करेंगे ? (ii) निदान तक पहुँचने के लिए कौन-कौन सी मुख्य जाँचें करनी होंगी, उन्हें गिनाइए । (iii) इस नवजात के प्रबंधन का वर्णन कीजिए । 3+4+8=15 (c) (i) शरीर के निम्नलिखित स्थानों में समतल शेवाक के रोगलक्षणों के बारे में जानकारी दीजिए : - नखों में - शिरोवल्क में - श्लेष्मा में - हथेलियों और तलवों में (ii) मुखी समतल शेवाक में पाई जाने वाली उतकविकृतिविज्ञान असामान्यताओं को उल्लेखित कीजिए । (iii) मुखी समतल शेवाक के प्रबंधन की विवेचना कीजिए । 5+5+5=15

Directive word: Describe

This question asks you to describe. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'describe' demands systematic, detailed exposition of clinical features, investigations, and management across all three scenarios. Allocate approximately 40% of time/words to part (a) pulmonary embolism (20 marks), 30% to part (b) neonatal jaundice (15 marks), and 30% to part (c) lichen planus (15 marks). Structure each part as: brief clinical interpretation → diagnostic workup → stepwise management, with part (c) additionally requiring site-specific clinical descriptions and histopathology.

Key points expected

  • Part (a): Identify pulmonary embolism (PE) as the diagnosis; explain Virchow's triad relevance in post-immobilization state; outline D-dimer, CTPA/Wells score, and ECG findings (S1Q3T3); detail anticoagulation (LMWH→warfarin/DOACs), thrombolysis criteria, and IVC filter indications
  • Part (b): Recognize ABO/Rh hemolytic disease with early-onset severe hyperbilirubinemia; describe Kramer's rule for jaundice staging and clinical signs of kernicterus; list direct Coombs test, peripheral smear, reticulocyte count, serum bilirubin (direct/indirect), and maternal antibody titres; explain intensive phototherapy, IVIG, exchange transfusion criteria, and neurological monitoring
  • Part (c)(i): Site-specific findings—nails (pterygium, thinning, ridging), scalp (cicatricial alopecia, follicular lichen planus), mucosa (Wickham's striae, erosive/reticular/bullous types), palms/soles (palmoplantar lichen planus, hypertrophic variant)
  • Part (c)(ii): Histopathology showing saw-tooth rete ridges, band-like lymphocytic infiltrate, Max-Joseph spaces, civatte bodies (colloid bodies), and basement membrane degeneration
  • Part (c)(iii): Management hierarchy—topical corticosteroids (high potency), calcineurin inhibitors, systemic agents (corticosteroids, retinoids, immunomodulators), and surveillance for malignant transformation

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%10Demonstrates precise pathophysiology: for (a) explains thrombus propagation from deep veins and hemodynamic consequences of massive/submassive PE; for (b) correctly distinguishes physiological vs pathological jaundice timing and bilirubin metabolism; for (c) accurately describes cell-mediated autoimmune mechanism and lichenoid tissue reaction patternStates correct diagnoses and basic mechanisms but with gaps—e.g., mentions PE without Virchow's triad, describes jaundice without conjugated/unconjugated distinction, or lists lichen planus features without autoimmune basisFundamental errors: confuses PE with MI, attributes neonatal jaundice to sepsis without hemolysis workup, or describes psoriasis features instead of lichen planus
Clinical correlation20%10For (a): correlates sudden dyspnea with pre-test probability (Wells score) and clinical signs of right heart strain; for (b): integrates early presentation (<24 hours), maternal Rh status, and neurological signs to predict kernicterus risk; for (c): distinguishes between erosive vs non-erosive oral LP and prognostic implications for squamous cell carcinoma surveillanceProvides clinical context but superficially—mentions risk factors without scoring systems, notes jaundice severity without bilirubin thresholds, or describes oral lesions without malignant potential warningMisses critical clinical connections—ignores temporal relation in PE diagnosis, fails to recognize emergency nature of neonatal presentation, or omits symptomatology entirely for lichen planus
Diagram / pathway20%10Includes: for (a) diagnostic algorithm flowchart (Wells score → D-dimer → CTPA) and/or pathophysiology diagram of thromboembolism; for (b) bilirubin metabolism pathway with enzyme defects and phototherapy mechanism; for (c) labeled histopathology diagram showing rete ridge pattern and inflammatory infiltrate zoneMentions investigations or pathways in text without visual representation, or provides incomplete diagrams lacking key labels (e.g., CTPA without radiation dose consideration, phototherapy without wavelength specification)No diagrams or flowcharts; purely textual description without structured algorithmic approach to diagnosis or management in any part
Differential / staging20%10For (a): differentiates massive vs submassive vs low-risk PE using hemodynamic criteria and RV dysfunction markers; for (b): stages jaundice by Kramer's zones and bilirubin levels, distinguishes Rh vs ABO incompatibility severity; for (c): classifies oral LP into reticular, erosive, atrophic, bullous subtypes with malignant transformation risk stratificationLists differentials without systematic classification—mentions MI, pneumonia, aortic dissection for (a) without prioritization; notes sepsis, G6PD deficiency for (b) without comparative timing; describes LP variants without malignant potential gradingNo differential diagnosis offered, or seriously incorrect differentials (e.g., COPD for PE, hypothyroidism for neonatal jaundice); confuses lichen planus with lichen sclerosus or psoriasis
Management / public-health angle20%10For (a): stepwise protocol—LMWH bridging, DOAC selection (rivaroxaban/apixaban), thrombolysis (alteplase) criteria, and IVC filter placement; for (b): evidence-based phototherapy thresholds per AAP guidelines, exchange transfusion indications, and long-term neurodevelopmental follow-up; for (c): WHO/Indian guidelines for erosive LP, topical tacrolimus vs clobetasol, and 6-monthly malignancy surveillance with biopsy indicationsDescribes standard treatments without protocol precision—mentions 'blood thinners' without specific agents, 'light therapy' without irradiance specifications, or 'steroids' without potency grading; omits follow-up protocolsDangerous or outdated management—recommends streptokinase as first-line for PE, suggests sunlight exposure for neonatal jaundice without phototherapy, or prescribes systemic steroids as first-line for oral LP without topical trial

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Medical Science 2021 Paper II