Physics 2023 Paper I 50 marks Compulsory Solve

Q5

(a) Find the energy stored in a system of four charges Q₁ = 1 nC, Q₂ = 2 nC, Q₃ = 3 nC and Q₄ = 4 nC placed at the cartesian coordinates R₁(1, 1), R₂(2, 1), R₃(1, 4) and R₄(2, 2), respectively. Assume free space. 10 marks (b) Derive the expression for the inductance per unit length of two long parallel wires each of radius a, separated by distance d from their axes and carrying equal and opposite current I. 10 marks (c) Show that Continuity equation is embedded in Maxwell's equations. 10 marks (d) Using Zeroth law of thermodynamics, introduce the concept of temperature. Explain how the isotherms of two different systems can be drawn. 10 marks (e) Write down the expressions for the Fermi-Dirac distribution and the Bose-Einstein distribution. Plot the distributions as a function of the energy. 10 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) कार्तीय निर्देशांकों R₁(1, 1), R₂(2, 1), R₃(1, 4) और R₄(2, 2) पर क्रमशः स्थित चार आवेशों Q₁ = 1 nC, Q₂ = 2 nC, Q₃ = 3 nC और Q₄ = 4 nC के एक निकाय में संचित ऊर्जा ज्ञात कीजिए । मुक्त आकाश की स्थिति मान लीजिए । 10 अंक (b) दो लम्बे और समांतर तारों, जिनमें प्रत्येक की त्रिज्या a है और जो एक दूसरे से उनके अक्षों के बीच की दूरी d पर स्थित हैं, में समान और विपरीत धारा I बह रही है । इनके एकांक लम्बाई के प्रेरकत्व का व्यंजक न्यूतन कीजिए । 10 अंक (c) दर्शाइए कि सांतत्य का समीकरण मैक्सवेल के समीकरणों में समाहित है । 10 अंक (d) ऊष्मागतिकी के शून्य कोटि के नियम का प्रयोग करते हुए ताप की धारणा को प्रतिपादित कीजिए । व्याख्या कीजिए कि कैसे दो अलग-अलग निकायों के लिए समताप रेखाएँ खींची जा सकती हैं । 10 अंक (e) फर्मी-डिराक बंटन और बोस-आइंस्टाइन बंटन के लिए व्यंजक लिखिए । इन दोनों बंटनों का आलेखन ऊर्जा के फलन के रूप में कीजिए । 10 अंक

Directive word: Solve

This question asks you to solve. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

This question requires solving five distinct problems spanning electrostatics, magnetostatics, electrodynamics, thermodynamics, and statistical mechanics. Allocate approximately 15-20% time to each sub-part, with slightly more attention to (b) and (c) due to their derivation demands. Structure your answer by clearly labeling each sub-part, showing all intermediate steps for calculations, and presenting derivations with logical flow from first principles. For (e), ensure plots are qualitatively accurate with proper labeling of axes and key features.

Key points expected

  • For (a): Calculate pairwise distances between all four charges using Cartesian coordinates, then apply superposition principle for electrostatic potential energy using U = (1/4πε₀)Σᵢ<ⱼ QᵢQⱼ/rᵢⱼ
  • For (b): Derive inductance per unit length by calculating magnetic flux linkage between two parallel wires, accounting for both external flux (between axes) and internal flux (within wire radius)
  • For (c): Take divergence of Ampère-Maxwell law and substitute Gauss's law to obtain ∇·J + ∂ρ/∂t = 0, explicitly showing charge conservation
  • For (d): State Zeroth law's transitive property (A~B and B~C implies A~C), define empirical temperature via thermal equilibrium, and sketch isotherms for ideal gas (hyperbolic) vs. van der Waals gas (with critical point)
  • For (e): Write Fermi-Dirac f_FD = 1/[e^(E-μ)/kT + 1] and Bose-Einstein f_BE = 1/[e^(E-μ)/kT - 1], plot showing step-like FD at low T and singular BE divergence at E→μ

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%10Correctly identifies that (a) requires pairwise summation not simple addition; recognizes internal flux contribution in (b); correctly applies vector calculus identities in (c); distinguishes thermal equilibrium from temperature in (d); identifies physical significance of ±1 in denominators for (e)Minor conceptual errors such as missing internal inductance in (b), confusing Zeroth with First law in (d), or incorrect asymptotic behavior in distribution plotsFundamental misconceptions like treating total potential energy as sum of self-energies, omitting displacement current in (c), or equating FD and BE distributions
Derivation rigour20%10Complete step-by-step derivations: for (b) explicit integration of B-field from surface to surface plus internal flux; for (c) clear vector calculus operations with Maxwell equations stated; logical progression from empirical temperature to isotherm constructionDerivations with gaps or skipped steps, such as assuming flux formula without integration, or stating continuity equation without showing divergence operationsMissing derivations entirely, or circular reasoning with conclusions assumed as premises; no attempt at mathematical justification
Diagram / FBD15%7.5Clear coordinate system for charge positions in (a); cross-sectional diagram showing field regions for (b); annotated Maxwell equation relationships for (c); schematic of thermal equilibrium experiment for (d); accurately sketched FD/BE curves with T=0, T<<TF, T>TF cases labeledDiagrams present but lacking labels or key features, such as unlabeled axes or missing asymptotic behavior in distribution plotsNo diagrams where required, or seriously misleading sketches (e.g., BE distribution showing negative values)
Numerical accuracy25%12.5Precise calculation in (a): distances r₁₂=1, r₁₃=3, r₁₄=√2, r₂₃=√10, r₂₄=1, r₃₄=√5; correct substitution with ε₀ = 8.854×10⁻¹² F/m; final answer in appropriate units (nJ or μJ); correct numerical factors in (b) including μ₀/π termCorrect method but arithmetic errors in distance calculations or unit conversions; correct formula in (b) with algebraic errorsOrder-of-magnitude errors, incorrect distance formulas, or missing factors of 4π or 1/2 in energy calculation
Physical interpretation20%10Interprets (a) result as work to assemble system; explains (b) result reduces to L ≈ (μ₀/π)ln(d/a) for d>>a; discusses charge conservation implications in (c); connects Zeroth law to temperature measurement via thermometry; contrasts fermion/boson quantum statistics and their macroscopic consequences (degeneracy pressure, BEC)Brief or superficial interpretation, stating formulas without explaining physical significanceNo physical interpretation provided, or incorrect interpretation (e.g., negative energy interpreted as repulsion)

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Physics 2023 Paper I