Physics 2024 Paper II 50 marks Compulsory Solve

Q1

Q1. (a) A particle limited to the x-axis has the wave function φ(x) = bx² between x = 0 and x = 2; the wave function φ(x) = 0 elsewhere. (i) Find the probability that the particle can be found between x = 1·0 and x = 1·5. (ii) Find the expectation value < x > of the particle position. 10 marks (b) Show that the square of the orbital angular momentum operator (L²) commutes with any of the components of angular momentum operator L. Is it possible to measure L², Lₓ, Lᵧ and Lᵤ simultaneously ? Give reasons for your answer. 6+4=10 marks (c) How is Rydberg constant related to emission wavelength of hydrogen spectrum ? 10 marks (d) Explain how the hydrogen spectrum is used for imaging the universe. 10 marks (e) Find the energy of the particle of mass m moving in a potential field V(x) = 2ℏ²b²x²/m for which the time independent wave function is ψ(x) = exp(– bx²). Here b is a constant. 10 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

Q1. (a) एक कण का तरंग फलन φ(x), x-अक्ष में x = 0 और x = 2 के बीच में bx² है एवं अन्य किसी स्थान पर φ(x) = 0 है। (i) x = 1·0 और x = 1·5 के बीच में कण के पाए जाने की प्रायिकता ज्ञात कीजिए। (ii) कण की स्थिति का प्रत्याशा मान < x > ज्ञात कीजिए। 10 अंक (b) दिखाइए कि कक्षक कोणीय संवेग संकारक का वर्ग (L²), कोणीय संवेग संकारक L के किसी भी घटक से दिक्परिवर्तक है। कारण सहित बताइए कि क्या L², Lₓ, Lᵧ और Lᵤ को युगपत स्थिति में मापा जा सकता है। 6+4=10 अंक (c) रिडबर्ग स्थिरांक हाइड्रोजन के स्पेक्ट्रम के उत्सर्जन तरंगदैर्ध्य से किस प्रकार संबंधित है ? 10 अंक (d) व्याख्या कीजिए कि हाइड्रोजन स्पेक्ट्रम किस प्रकार ब्रह्मांड को प्रतिबिंबित करने के लिए उपयोग किया जाता है। 10 अंक (e) उस कण की ऊर्जा ज्ञात कीजिए जिसका द्रव्यमान m है और जो विभव क्षेत्र V(x) = 2ℏ²b²x²/m में गतिमान है और जिसका समय मुक्त तरंग फलन ψ(x) = exp(– bx²) है। यहाँ b एक स्थिरांक है। 10 अंक

Directive word: Solve

This question asks you to solve. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Solve each sub-part systematically with clear mathematical working: spend ~20% time on (a)(i)-(ii) normalization and probability calculations; ~20% on (b) commutation relations with [L²,Lᵢ]=0 proof; ~20% on (c) Rydberg formula derivation; ~20% on (d) 21-cm line and cosmological applications; ~20% on (e) Schrödinger equation verification. Begin with normalization for (a), state commutation algebra for (b), derive 1/λ = R(1/n₁² - 1/n₂²) for (c), discuss HI regions and redshift for (d), and substitute ψ into TISE for (e).

Key points expected

  • (a)(i) Normalization of φ(x)=bx² on [0,2] to find b, then probability integral P=∫₁^₁·⁵|φ|²dx with correct limits and evaluation
  • (a)(ii) Expectation value ⟨x⟩ = ∫₀² x|φ|²dx / ∫₀²|φ|²dx with proper substitution and algebraic simplification
  • (b) Proof that [L²,Lₓ]=[L²,Lᵧ]=[L²,Lᵤ]=0 using [Lᵢ,Lⱼ]=iℏεᵢⱼₖLₖ and L²=Lₓ²+Lᵧ²+Lᵤ²; explanation that L² commutes with each Lᵢ but [Lₓ,Lᵧ]=iℏLᵤ≠0 prevents simultaneous measurement of all components
  • (c) Derivation of Rydberg formula from Bohr model or quantum mechanics: 1/λ = R_H(1/n₁² - 1/n₂²) with R_H = mₑe⁴/(8ε₀²h³c) = 1.097×10⁷ m⁻¹; mention reduced mass correction
  • (d) Explanation of 21-cm hyperfine transition in neutral hydrogen; mapping galactic spiral arms (Indian astronomers like Radhakrishnan and Gopal-Krishna's work on galactic magnetic fields); cosmological redshift and large-scale structure mapping
  • (e) Substitution of ψ(x)=exp(-bx²) into time-independent Schrödinger equation: -ℏ²/2m · d²ψ/dx² + V(x)ψ = Eψ; calculation of derivatives and verification that E=ℏ²b/m satisfies the equation

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%10Correctly identifies normalization condition for (a); states all three commutation relations [L²,Lᵢ]=0 for (b); accurately presents Rydberg formula with physical constants for (c); correctly identifies 21-cm line mechanism for (d); properly sets up TISE with kinetic and potential terms for (e)Minor errors in normalization limits or commutation algebra; incomplete Rydberg derivation; vague mention of hydrogen mapping without 21-cm specificity; correct final energy but missing intermediate stepsFundamental misunderstanding of probability interpretation in QM; incorrect commutation relations; confuses Rydberg with other constants; no mention of hyperfine structure; algebraic errors in Schrödinger substitution
Derivation rigour20%10Step-by-step normalization with explicit integral evaluation; complete commutation proof using Levi-Civita symbol or component expansion; full Bohr model derivation to Rydberg formula; systematic TISE verification with all derivatives shownCorrect approach but skips algebraic steps; commutation proof incomplete (shows one component only); Rydberg formula stated without derivation; energy eigenvalue found but derivative steps condensedMissing crucial steps in normalization (no integration shown); asserts commutation without proof; no derivation attempt for Rydberg; incorrect differentiation of Gaussian wave function
Diagram / FBD10%5Clear sketch of wave function φ(x)=bx² on [0,2] with shaded probability region for 1<x<1.5 in (a); vector diagram showing L² as magnitude and Lₓ,Lᵧ,Lᵤ as components with uncertainty sphere for (b); energy level diagram for hydrogen transitions in (c); schematic of 21-cm line emission from HI regions with redshift indication for (d)Basic wave function sketch without probability shading; generic angular momentum diagram; standard hydrogen energy level diagram; simple mention of redshift without diagramNo diagrams where clearly applicable; irrelevant or incorrect diagrams; missing visual representation of probability density
Numerical accuracy25%12.5Exact value b=(105/32)^(1/2) from normalization; probability P=651/1024≈0.636 or exact fraction; ⟨x⟩=16/7≈2.286; correct R_H=1.097×10⁷ m⁻¹; energy eigenvalue E=ℏ²b/m with full algebraic verificationCorrect numerical methods with minor arithmetic errors; approximate values acceptable if method clear; correct final energy with one algebraic slipMajor calculation errors in integrals; incorrect probability outside [0,1]; wrong Rydberg value by orders of magnitude; energy eigenvalue not verified or incorrect
Physical interpretation25%12.5Explains why probability peaks near x=2 for (a); clarifies that L² and one Lᵢ can be simultaneous observables but not all three components due to non-commutation—referencing uncertainty principle; connects Rydberg to atomic spectra fingerprints; discusses how 21-cm line penetrates dust enabling mapping of galactic structure and cosmic dawn (relevant to India's SARAS experiment); interprets Gaussian ψ as ground state of harmonic-like potential with zero nodesBasic interpretation of results without deep physical insight; mentions uncertainty principle superficially; standard description of spectroscopic applications; identifies ground state without discussing whyNo interpretation of mathematical results; fails to explain why simultaneous measurement is limited; no connection to observational astronomy; treats (e) as purely mathematical exercise

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Physics 2024 Paper II