Psychology 2021 Paper I 50 marks Discuss

Q4

(a) Why is selective attention important? Discuss the theories of selective attention. (20 marks) (b) Which method is most appropriate to investigate gender differences in aggressive behaviour at the work place? Elaborate. (15 marks) (c) Describe the role of schemas and mnemonic devices in expertise and exceptional memory. (15 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) चयनात्मक ध्यान क्यों महत्वपूर्ण है ? चयनात्मक ध्यान के सिद्धांतों का वर्णन कीजिए । (20 अंक) (b) कार्यस्थल पर आक्रमक व्यवहार में लिंग-भेद की जांच करने के लिए कौन सी विधि सबसे उपयुक्त है ? विस्तार से वर्णन कीजिए । (15 अंक) (c) विशेषज्ञता और असाधारण स्मृति में स्कीमा और स्मृतिकारक उपकरणों (निमोनिक डिवाइसेस) की भूमिका का वर्णन कीजिए । (15 अंक)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2021 Psychology questions

Directive word: Discuss

This question asks you to discuss. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'discuss' demands a balanced, analytical treatment with critical examination of multiple viewpoints. Structure: Introduction (100 words) → Part (a) Selective attention: importance (150 words) + theories (350 words, 40% time) → Part (b) Research methods: justification of method choice with elaboration (300 words, 30% time) → Part (c) Schemas and mnemonics: expertise and exceptional memory (300 words, 30% time) → Conclusion synthesizing attention-memory-research linkages (100 words).

Key points expected

  • Part (a): Importance of selective attention—filtering overload, resource allocation, survival value; theories—Broadbent's filter model, Treisman's attenuation model, Deutsch-Norman's late selection, multimodal integration (visual search, Stroop effect)
  • Part (a): Critical comparison of early vs late selection with empirical support (Cherry's cocktail party, Treisman's shadowing, McKay's priming studies)
  • Part (b): Selection and justification of appropriate research method—experimental (laboratory/field), quasi-experimental, observational, or meta-analytic; elaboration on design, controls, ethical considerations for workplace aggression
  • Part (b): Gender-sensitive methodological issues—operationalization of aggression, power dynamics in Indian workplaces, response bias, intersectionality of caste/class
  • Part (c): Schema theory—Bartlett's reconstructive memory, expertise via domain-specific schemas (chess masters—Chase & Simon, medical diagnosis—Patel & Groen)
  • Part (c): Mnemonic devices—method of loci, peg-word system, chunking; role in exceptional memory (Rajan's digit span, mnemonists like Shereshevskii/Luria)
  • Part (c): Interaction: how schemas and mnemonics together enable expertise—skilled memory theory (Ericsson & Kintsch), long-term working memory
  • Synthesis: Attentional mechanisms underlie schema activation; research methods validate memory theories; applied relevance for India—traffic management, competitive exam preparation, workplace DEI policies

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%10Precise definitions: for (a) distinguishes inattentional blindness from change blindness; for (b) correctly identifies quasi-experimental or field experimental as most appropriate with rationale; for (c) accurately distinguishes declarative schemas from procedural scripts and peg-word from method of lociBroadly correct definitions with minor errors—e.g., conflates filter and attenuation models, or confuses experimental with correlational designs, or treats schemas and mnemonics as interchangeableFundamental errors—e.g., describes selective attention as voluntary only, suggests survey method for (b) without justification, or defines schemas as identical to mnemonics
Theory & studies cited20%10For (a): Cherry (1953), Broadbent (1958), Treisman (1964), Deutsch & Deutsch (1963), Kahneman's capacity theory; for (b): specific methodological precedents—Baron & Richardson (meta-analysis), or Indian studies like Sharma & Sharma on workplace aggression; for (c): Bartlett (1932), Chase & Simon (1973), Ericsson & Kintsch (1995), Luria (1968), Baddely's working memory integrationMentions 1-2 major theorists per part correctly but misses critical studies—e.g., names Broadbent but omits Cherry, or cites Ericsson without Kintsch, or uses generic 'studies show' without specificsIncorrect attribution (e.g., attributes filter model to Treisman) or anachronism, or cites irrelevant theories (e.g., Piaget for schemas without specifying memory application)
Application examples20%10For (a): Indian examples—distracted driving on Indian roads, air traffic control at Mumbai/Delhi airports, selective attention in cricket batting; for (b): specific workplace contexts—IT sector stress, factory floor aggression, #MeToo reporting methodologies; for (c): Indian mnemonists, Vedic memorization techniques, UPSC toppers' memory strategies, medical expertise in rural health diagnosisGeneric Western examples only—e.g., cocktail party effect, laboratory aggression studies, chess masters without Indian adaptation, or superficial mention of 'students use mnemonics'No concrete examples, or invented/irrelevant applications—e.g., selective attention in sleep, or schemas in motor learning without memory link
Multi-perspective analysis20%10For (a): compares early/late selection with neuroimaging evidence (fMRI studies of anterior cingulate); for (b): weighs experimental vs. naturalistic observation vs. meta-analysis with feminist critique of 'gender differences' framing; for (c): balances nativist (innate talent) vs. expertise (deliberate practice) accounts, addresses limitations of schema theory (reconstructive distortion)Acknowledges one alternative perspective per part but superficially—e.g., notes 'some disagree' without elaboration, or lists pros/cons without integrationSingle perspective only—e.g., presents only early selection theories, assumes experimental method is objectively 'best' without debate, or presents mnemonics as universally effective without individual differences
Conclusion & evaluation20%10Synthesizes across parts: attentional selection enables schema activation which research methods must capture; evaluates current state—e.g., load theory resolves early/late debate, mixed-methods best for workplace aggression, deliberate practice explains expertise better than innate memory; forward-looking—AI/attention interfaces, policy implications for Indian workplaces, educational applicationsSummarizes each part separately without cross-linking; or makes generic concluding statements ('more research needed') without specific directionNo conclusion, or abrupt ending; or introduces entirely new concepts in conclusion; or contradicts body of answer

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Psychology 2021 Paper I