Paper I — Q6
(a) Are we born with personality? Critically evaluate with theoretical interpretation. (20 marks) (b) Describe the strategies of…
Are we born with personality? Critically evaluate with theoretical interpretation. 20 marks
Describe the strategies of effective communication training. 15 marks
Discuss the physiological basis of emotion and its measurement. 15 marks
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
क्या हम एक व्यक्तित्व के साथ पैदा हुए हैं ? सैद्धांतिक व्याख्या के साथ आलोचनात्मक मूल्यांकन कीजिए । (20 अंक)
प्रभावी संचार प्रशिक्षण की रणनीति का वर्णन करें । (15 अंक)
भावना के शारीरिक आधार एवं इसके मापन का वर्णन करें । (15 अंक)
Model answer
Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.
(a) Are we born with personality? We are born with personality tendencies, not a finished personality.
Evidence for biological roots:
- Twin and adoption studies show heritable differences in temperament (activity, emotionality, sociability), with heritability of Big Five traits of about 0.4–0.5.
- Eysenck's PEN model links extraversion to cortical arousal and neuroticism to autonomic reactivity.
- Early temperament (Thomas and Chess: easy, difficult, slow-to-warm-up) shows individual differences from infancy.
Evidence for environment:
- Psychodynamic theory: early relationships and unconscious conflict shape personality.
- Humanistic theory (Rogers, Maslow): conditions of worth and self-concept direct growth.
- Social-cognitive theory (Bandura): observation, reinforcement, self-efficacy and reciprocal determinism keep modifying behaviour.
- Cultural psychology: trait structure is recognisable across cultures in India, but expression is moderated by family roles and gender expectations.
The best-supported position is interactionist. Gene–environment correlation, epigenetics and diathesis–stress models show that a highly reactive child may become anxious in a punitive home but resilient in a supportive one. Strict determinism of either kind is not supported, and heritability describes populations, not individuals.
(b) Strategies of effective communication training Training is systematic and begins with a diagnosis of listening, clarity, feedback and non-verbal habits.
- Assertiveness training (Wolpe, Salter): role-play, modelling and rehearsal to express needs without aggression or passivity.
- Active listening (Rogers): paraphrasing, reflecting feeling and withholding premature advice.
- Non-verbal skills: eye contact, posture, gesture, tone and personal space, with attention to cultural differences.
- Feedback and reinforcement: specific, behaviour-based feedback, with practice in giving and receiving it, and positive reinforcement of change.
- Empathy and perspective-taking: case vignettes, role reversal and reflective journals.
- Transfer: on-the-job practice, video feedback and follow-up so that skills last.
In administration, modules on clarity, grievance handling, public speaking and emotional intelligence help officials turn policy into public trust.
(c) Physiological basis of emotion and its measurement Theories: James–Lange (feeling follows awareness of bodily change); Cannon–Bard (bodily and experiential components occur together, via the thalamus); Schachter–Singer (arousal is labelled by cognitive appraisal).
Structures: the amygdala processes threat and emotional salience, the hippocampus supplies context, the prefrontal cortex regulates emotion, and the hypothalamus coordinates autonomic and endocrine responses. The sympathetic–adrenal–medullary system drives rapid arousal, and the HPA axis sustains stress responses.
Measurement:
- Autonomic indices: heart rate, skin conductance, respiration, blood pressure (as in the polygraph, which measures arousal and not deception, and is open to anxiety and countermeasures).
- Facial EMG and the startle response for subtle affect and defensive reactivity.
- Hormonal measures such as salivary cortisol.
- Self-report scales such as PANAS.
- Neuroimaging: fMRI (BOLD signal) and PET for activity and receptors; EEG for timing.
No single measure is sufficient, so combining physiological and self-report measures is best.
How this answer will be evaluated
What earns full marks: Comprehensive theoretical coverage with named evidence, balanced evaluation, and specific examples.
Evaluation rubric
Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.
- (a) Critically evaluate whether personality is innate, with theoretical interpretation. 20 marks
critically evaluate— positives → negatives/limits → conditions/safeguards → conclusion
Must cover
- Biological evidence: twin studies, Eysenck PEN, early temperament
- Environmental theories: psychodynamic, humanistic, social-cognitive, cultural
- Interactionist verdict: gene-environment correlation, diathesis-stress
Loses marks
- Taking an extreme nature-only or nurture-only position
Earns more
- Heritability is a population statistic
Extra mark
- Indian cross-cultural evidence
- (b) Describe the strategies of effective communication training. 15 marks
describe— define → structure or process in order → labelled diagram → significance
Must cover
- Needs diagnosis followed by assertiveness training
- Active listening, non-verbal skills
- Feedback, reinforcement and transfer of skills
Loses marks
- Giving only general advice without training methods
Earns more
- Empathy and perspective-taking exercises
Extra mark
- Application to administration
- (c) Discuss the physiological basis of emotion and its measurement. 15 marks
discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close
Must cover
- Theories: James-Lange, Cannon-Bard, Schachter-Singer
- Structures and systems: amygdala, hypothalamus, ANS, HPA axis
- Measures: autonomic indices, facial EMG, self-report, neuroimaging
Loses marks
- Claiming the polygraph detects lies directly
Earns more
- Limits of the polygraph
Extra mark
- Salivary cortisol, EEG
What "Critically evaluate" is asking you to do
Judge how well something has performed against the standard it set for itself — its stated aim, mandate or promise — and commit to a verdict. Name the yardstick before you judge; an unanchored judgement reads as opinion. “Critically” is not a section added at the end: name the yardstick you are judging by — the evidence, the stated objective, a constitutional principle, a rival explanation — and let a verdict close each part of the body. Where the question quotes a claim, that verdict must land on the claim itself, accepted, qualified or rejected, and not on the theme in general.
Structure that answers it
Name the yardstick — stated aim, mandate or benchmark → performance against it → shortfall against it → why the gap exists → verdict
Where marks are lost
Merits in one paragraph, demerits in the next, and a conclusion calling for a balanced and holistic approach. That is a survey with the judgement left out and it holds the answer in the middle band. The opposite error is reading “critically” as permission to attack — and with the odd pairings, critically describe or critically explain, the exposition still carries most of the marks, the judgement being a layer on it rather than a substitute for it.
Practice this exact question
Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.
Evaluate my answer →More from Psychology 2021 Paper I
- Q3 (a) How much nature (genetic factors) and nurture (environmental factors) contribute to a…
- Q4 (a) Why is selective attention important? Discuss the theories of selective attention. (2…
- Q5 Answer the following questions in about 150 words each: (a) "Some psychological measures…
- Q6 (a) Are we born with personality? Critically evaluate with theoretical interpretation. (2…
- Q7 (a) Which approaches to motivation are more commonly used in an organization? How these a…
- Q8 (a) Humans strive to assign causes to actions of self and others and fall into traps of b…