Psychology 2021 Paper II 50 marks Discuss

Q8

(a) What are the forms of social conflicts? Explain the methods of resolution of social conflicts. (15 marks) (b) In the light of post-COVID-19 pandemic, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of online learning. (15 marks) (c) What is the need of early identification of mentally challenged children? Write about the strategies for early intervention. (20 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) सामाजिक संघर्षों के रूप क्या हैं? सामाजिक संघर्षों के समाधान के तरीकों की व्याख्या कीजिए। (15 अंक) (b) पोस्ट-कोविड-19 महामारी को ध्यान में रखते हुए ऑनलाइन सीखने के फायदे और नुकसान पर चर्चा कीजिए। (15 अंक) (c) मानसिक रूप से विकलांग बच्चों की शीघ्र पहचान की क्या आवश्यकता है? प्रारंभिक हस्तक्षेप के लिए रणनीतियों के बारे में लिखिए। (20 अंक)

Directive word: Discuss

This question asks you to discuss. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'discuss' requires critical examination with balanced arguments across all three sub-parts. Allocate approximately 30% time/words to part (a) on social conflicts, 30% to part (b) on post-COVID online learning, and 40% to part (c) on early identification and intervention for mentally challenged children, reflecting the 15:15:20 mark distribution. Structure with a brief composite introduction, three distinct well-demarcated sections for each sub-part, and an integrated conclusion highlighting the psychological theme of adaptive functioning across individual and social levels.

Key points expected

  • Part (a): Classification of social conflicts (interpersonal, intergroup, intragroup, institutional) with examples like caste/class tensions or communal conflicts in India; resolution methods including negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and transformative approaches with reference to Gandhian conflict resolution or Lok Adalats
  • Part (a): Theoretical grounding in Deutsch's cooperation-competition theory, Sherif's realistic group conflict theory, or Burton's human needs theory applied to Indian social conflicts
  • Part (b): Post-COVID context analysis with specific reference to digital divide in India (rural-urban, gender, socioeconomic), mental health implications including screen fatigue and isolation effects
  • Part (b): Balanced evaluation citing NCERT's DIKSHA platform, SWAYAM, and ASER 2021-22 findings on learning loss; psychological theories of self-regulated learning and cognitive load
  • Part (c): Critical importance of 0-6 years neuroplasticity window, developmental screening tools (DDST, INCLEN tools), and Indian context of ICDS integration for early identification
  • Part (c): Comprehensive intervention strategies including family-centered approaches, stimulation programs (Portage, Home-Based Care), inclusive education preparation, and reference to RPwD Act 2016 and National Trust schemes

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%10Precise definitions across all parts: for (a) distinguishes latent vs. manifest conflict and primary vs. secondary conflict accurately; for (b) correctly applies cognitive load theory and self-regulated learning concepts; for (c) accurately defines intellectual disability categories (mild, moderate, severe, profound) and distinguishes developmental delay from disabilityGenerally correct definitions with minor inaccuracies; conflates some conflict types or uses 'mental retardation' outdated terminology; basic understanding of online learning without theoretical depthFundamental conceptual errors such as equating all social conflicts with violence, confusing online learning with distance education historically, or using 'mental illness' interchangeably with intellectual disability
Theory & studies cited20%10For (a) cites Deutsch (1973), Coser's functions of social conflict, or Gandhi's satyagraha; for (b) references Mayer's multimedia learning, Kirschner's cognitive load research, or Indian studies like Azim Premji Foundation surveys; for (c) includes Guralnick's early intervention efficacy, Ramey & Ramey's Abecedarian Project, or Indian studies from NIMHMentions some theorists without elaboration (e.g., names Sherif but doesn't explain realistic conflict theory); generic reference to 'research shows' without specificity; limited Indian research citationsNo theoretical references or incorrect attribution; confuses theorists across domains; cites irrelevant theories (e.g., Freudian psychoanalysis for conflict resolution)
Application examples20%10Rich contextualization: for (a) analyzes Cauvery water dispute, Naxalite conflict, or recent farmer protests with resolution attempts; for (b) specific platforms (Google Classroom, BYJU's, DIKSHA), PM eVIDYA, and district-specific digital access data; for (c) Samagra Shiksha, ADIP scheme, or specific early intervention centers like NIMH or regional DMHPsSome relevant Indian examples but generic (e.g., 'communal riots' without specificity); mentions online platforms without post-COVID specificity; basic awareness of special education without scheme namesNo Indian examples or inappropriate foreign examples without adaptation; hypothetical scenarios instead of documented cases; anachronistic references (pre-digital era for online learning)
Multi-perspective analysis20%10For (a) examines structural, psychological, and cultural dimensions of conflict; for (b) balances cognitive, emotional, social, and equity perspectives with stakeholder analysis (students, teachers, parents, policymakers); for (c) integrates biological, psychological, family systems, and sociocultural perspectives on disability with critique of medical vs. social modelTwo perspectives covered adequately but missing third dimension; some imbalance favoring advantages over disadvantages in (b) or intervention over identification in (c)Single perspective dominance; purely descriptive without analytical tension; missing critical dimension entirely (e.g., no equity analysis in online learning, no family perspective in early intervention)
Conclusion & evaluation20%10Synthesizes across all three parts to highlight the unifying theme of adaptive human functioning and systemic support; for (a) evaluates which resolution methods suit India's pluralistic society; for (b) offers evidence-based policy recommendations for hybrid learning; for (c) argues for universal developmental screening with implementation roadmap; demonstrates awareness of contemporary debates (NEP 2020 alignment)Separate conclusions for each part without integration; generic recommendations without specificity; limited evaluative stanceMissing conclusion or mere summary; no forward-looking recommendations; contradictory final statements across parts

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Psychology 2021 Paper II