Public Administration 2023 Paper II 50 marks 150 words Compulsory Examine

Q5

Answer the following in about 150 words each : 10×5=50 (a) The district training component of Induction Training of IAS officers requires to be revisited. Examine. 10 (b) "Mission Antyodaya strives to realize the vision of poverty-free India." Examine. 10 (c) The dynamics of coalitions vary with the nature of leadership, political parties and contemporary political conditions. Analyze. 10 (d) Computerization of treasuries has revolutionized the accounting and budget planning process. Comment. 10 (e) Do you agree that code of ethics and code of conduct for ministers would help in upholding higher standards of their constitutional and ethical conduct ? Explain. 10

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

निम्नलिखित में से प्रत्येक का लगभग 150 शब्दों में उत्तर दीजिए : (a) आईएएस अधिकारियों के प्रवेश प्रशिक्षण के जिला प्रशिक्षण घटक पर पुनर्विचार करने की आवश्यकता है । परीक्षण कीजिए । 10 (b) "मिशन अन्त्योदय गरीबी-मुक्त भारत की परिकल्पना को साकार करने का प्रयास है ।" परीक्षण कीजिए । 10 (c) गठबंधन के आयाम नेतृत्व की प्रकृति, राजनीतिक दल तथा समकालीन राजनीतिक परिस्थितियों के अनुसार बदलते रहते हैं । विश्लेषण कीजिए । 10 (d) कोषागारों के कम्प्यूटरीकरण ने लेखांकन तथा बजट आयोजन प्रक्रिया में क्रांतिकारी परिवर्तन ला दिया है । टिप्पणी कीजिए । 10 (e) क्या आप सहमत हैं कि मंत्रियों के संवैधानिक और नैतिक आचरण के उच्च मानकों को कायम रखने के लिए नीति संहिता एवं आचार संहिता सहायक होगी ? व्याख्या कीजिए । 10

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2023 Public Administration questions

Directive word: Examine

This question asks you to examine. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'examine' dominates parts (a), (b), (c) with 'comment' for (d) and 'explain' for (e). Allocate approximately 30 words per sub-part (150 words each), spending roughly 3 minutes per part. Structure each answer with a brief contextual introduction, analytical body addressing both positive and critical dimensions, and a concise forward-looking conclusion. For (a) focus on gaps in district training; (b) assess Mission Antyodaya's convergence approach; (c) analyze coalition dynamics through leadership-party-conditions framework; (d) evaluate treasury computerization impacts; (e) argue for ministerial codes with constitutional-ethical linkage.

Key points expected

  • (a) Critiques district training's disconnect from grassroots realities, inadequate field exposure, and need for experiential learning models like 'Bharat Darshan' reforms
  • (b) Examines Mission Antyodaya's convergence of 34 central schemes, GPDP-Gram Panchayat integration, and gaps in saturation approach for poverty elimination
  • (c) Analyzes how coalition dynamics shift between transactional (Deve Gowda era), ideological (NDA-I), and survivalist (UPA-II) modes with leadership-party variables
  • (d) Assesses PFMS integration, real-time expenditure tracking, and treasury computerization's impact on fiscal transparency and budget credibility
  • (e) Argues for ministerial code of ethics drawing from Nolan principles, 2nd ARC recommendations, and need to constitutionalize conduct norms beyond oath of office
  • (a)-(e) Cross-cutting: Links each sub-part to contemporary administrative reforms and 2nd ARC/15th Finance Commission recommendations where relevant

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%10Precisely defines IAS district training phases, Mission Antyodaya's 2015 launch and 2018 restructuring, coalition types (minimum winning vs. surplus), PFMS-Treasury integration, and distinguishes code of ethics from code of conduct; no conceptual conflation across sub-partsGenerally accurate definitions but misses nuances like Antyodya's gram panchayat saturation approach or conflates treasury computerization with general e-governanceMajor errors such as treating Mission Antyodaya as employment scheme, confusing coalition dynamics with federalism, or equating ministerial ethics codes with civil service conduct rules
Theoretical anchor20%10Applies Rae-Douglas coalition theory for (c), experiential learning theory for (a), convergence theory for (b), New Public Management for (d), and constitutional morality framework for (e); integrates 2nd ARC reports relevantlyMentions 2nd ARC or L.K. Jha Committee superficially without applying theoretical frameworks to analyze the specific phenomenaNo theoretical grounding; purely descriptive answers without reference to administrative theory, committee reports, or constitutional provisions
Indian administrative examples20%10Cites specific illustrations: Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration reforms for (a); GPDP-SEC convergence in aspirational districts for (b); UPA-I Common Minimum Programme vs. NDA-II coalition management for (c); PFMS integration with state treasuries for (d); Karnataka/MP ministerial code experiments for (e)Generic references to 'some states' or 'recent initiatives' without naming specific training academies, districts, coalition governments, or treasury systemsNo Indian examples; uses hypothetical illustrations or irrelevant foreign comparisons that don't illuminate Indian administrative context
Reform / policy angle20%10Proposes actionable reforms: competency-based district training with SDG localization for (a); Antyodaya Plus with Aadhaar-MIS integration for (b); institutionalized coalition coordination mechanisms for (c); TSA-Treasury integration with predictive analytics for (d); legislation on ministerial accountability for (e)Mentions need for reform in general terms without specific policy instruments or implementation pathways for any sub-partPurely critical or descriptive without constructive reform suggestions; or proposes unrealistic reforms ignoring fiscal/federal constraints
Conclusion & forward look20%10Synthesizes across sub-parts to highlight administrative transformation theme; for (a)-(e) collectively points toward adaptive governance, with specific forward linkages to SDG localization, cooperative federalism, and ethical governance frameworksRepetitive summaries of points made without synthesis; generic 'government should do more' conclusions without specificityNo conclusion; abrupt endings, or conclusions that contradict the analytical body; missing forward-looking element entirely

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Public Administration 2023 Paper II