Paper II — Q4
(a) Describe the stages of human evolution and mention the major hominid forms giving their time of origin. (20 marks) (b) What…
Describe the stages of human evolution and mention the major hominid forms giving their time of origin. 20 marks
What is Hardy-Weinberg law? How is gene frequency changed by mutation and genetic drift in populations? 15 marks
What is the difference between systematics and taxonomy? Differentiate between classical and molecular taxonomy with the tools used. 15 marks
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
मानव उद्विकास के चरणों का वर्णन कीजिए तथा मुख्य होमिनिड अवस्थाओं (फॉर्म) को उनकी उत्पत्ति के काल को दर्शाते हुए उल्लिखित कीजिए। (20 अंक)
हार्डी-वीनबर्ग नियम क्या है? समष्टि में उत्परिवर्तन तथा आनुवंशिक विचलन (जेनेटिक ड्रिफ्ट) से जीन आवृत्ति कैसे परिवर्तित होती है? (15 अंक)
वर्गीकरण-विज्ञान तथा वर्गिकी में क्या अंतर है? चिरप्रतिष्ठित एवं आणविक वर्गिकी में प्रयुक्त उपकरणों सहित अंतर कीजिए। (15 अंक)
Model answer
Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.
(a) Stages of Human Evolution and Major Hominid Forms
Human evolution is the sequence of hominin forms in which bipedalism appeared first and brain enlargement, dental reduction and tool culture followed. The main stages, with approximate dates of origin, are:
- Miocene apes (background): Dryopithecus (about 12–9 million years ago, Mya) and Ramapithecus (about 14–8 Mya). Ramapithecus, once proposed as the first hominid from the Siwaliks, is now included in Sivapithecus, which is related to the orangutan lineage and is not a human ancestor.
- Earliest hominins (late Miocene): Sahelanthropus tchadensis (about 7 Mya, Chad), Orrorin tugenensis (about 6 Mya, Kenya) and Ardipithecus (5.8–4.4 Mya, Ethiopia; "Ardi" of A. ramidus), showing early bipedal traits combined with ape-like features.
- Australopithecines (Pliocene): A. anamensis (about 4.2–3.9 Mya), A. afarensis (about 3.9–2.9 Mya; "Lucy" and the Laetoli footprints) and A. africanus (about 3.3–2.1 Mya; the Taung child). They were habitually bipedal, with cranial capacity of about 400–550 cc, smaller canines and no consistent tool making. The robust Paranthropus species (about 2.7–1.2 Mya) were a side branch specialised for heavy chewing.
- Homo habilis (about 2.4–1.4 Mya): brain about 500–700 cc, first clear link with Oldowan stone tools.
- Homo erectus (about 1.9 Mya–110 thousand years ago): brain about 800–1,200 cc, human-like body proportions, Acheulean hand-axes, probable use of fire, and the first dispersal out of Africa into Asia (Java, Peking man).
- Homo heidelbergensis (about 700–200 thousand years ago): brain about 1,100–1,300 cc; widely regarded as the common ancestor of Neanderthals and modern humans. The Narmada hominin from Hathnora in Madhya Pradesh, India's only Middle Pleistocene fossil hominin, is usually placed with archaic Homo of this grade.
- Homo neanderthalensis (about 400–40 thousand years ago): Europe and western Asia; brain about 1,200–1,700 cc, robust cold-adapted body, Mousterian tools and burial of the dead. Denisovans, known mainly from DNA, lived in Asia at the same time, and both groups interbred with modern humans.
- Homo sapiens (about 300 thousand years ago–present): oldest fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco; brain about 1,300–1,500 cc, symbolic art and language, and dispersal out of Africa after about 70–60 thousand years ago to all continents.
Throughout this sequence, the skeleton shows bipedalism (S-shaped spine, bowl-shaped pelvis, forward foramen magnum, arched foot) well before major brain expansion, while the jaws and teeth became smaller as diet and tool use changed.
(b) Hardy–Weinberg Law; Change of Gene Frequency by Mutation and Genetic Drift
The Hardy–Weinberg law states that in a large, randomly mating population with no mutation, selection, migration or genetic drift, allele and genotype frequencies remain constant from generation to generation. For two alleles A and a with frequencies p and q (p + q = 1), the genotype frequencies are p² (AA) + 2pq (Aa) + q² (aa) = 1, and equilibrium is reached after a single generation of random mating. The law is a null model: a significant departure from p², 2pq and q² (tested by χ²) shows that an assumption is violated and evolution is occurring.
Mutation changes gene frequency by converting one allele into another. If A mutates to a at rate u per generation and a back to A at rate v, the change in the frequency of A is Δp = vq − up, and an equilibrium is reached at q̂ = u/(u + v). Because mutation rates are low (about 10⁻⁵–10⁻⁶ per gene per generation), mutation alone changes frequencies very slowly, but it continually supplies the variation on which selection and drift act.
Genetic drift is the random change in allele frequency caused by sampling of gametes in a finite population. The variance of change per generation is pq/2N, so drift is strongest when the effective population size (Nₑ) is small. An allele's chance of eventual fixation equals its current frequency, and heterozygosity falls by a proportion of about 1/(2Nₑ) each generation, i.e. H′ = H(1 − 1/2Nₑ). Drift can fix or eliminate alleles regardless of their fitness. The bottleneck effect (for example the cheetah) and the founder effect (for example high frequencies of certain recessive disorders in small founder communities) are special cases.
(c) Systematics versus Taxonomy; Classical versus Molecular Taxonomy
Systematics is the scientific study of the kinds and diversity of organisms and of all relationships among them (Simpson); it includes taxonomy together with phylogeny, evolution and biogeography. Taxonomy is the theory and practice of identifying, describing, naming and classifying organisms according to rules of nomenclature. Taxonomy is thus a part of systematics.
Classical and molecular taxonomy differ as follows:
- Basis: classical taxonomy uses morphology, anatomy, embryology, cytology (karyotypes) and behaviour; molecular taxonomy uses nucleotide and amino-acid sequences and other molecular markers.
- Tools: classical work relies on museum and type specimens, dissection and microscopy, dichotomous keys, and numerical taxonomy (phenetics) with character matrices; molecular work uses PCR and DNA sequencing, DNA barcoding with the mitochondrial COI gene (about 648 bp), 16S/18S rRNA and mitochondrial DNA, microsatellites and SNPs, RFLP, protein electrophoresis, and computer tools such as BLAST, ClustalW and MEGA for alignment and phylogenetic trees (maximum likelihood, Bayesian methods), increasingly using whole genomes.
- Strengths and limits: classical taxonomy is cheap, works with fossils and is needed for naming and field identification, but can be misled by convergence and by phenotypic plasticity; molecular taxonomy detects cryptic species and resolves deep relationships, but needs good-quality DNA, can be confused by incomplete lineage sorting or hybridisation, and cannot be applied to most fossils.
Modern integrative taxonomy combines both lines of evidence.
How this answer will be evaluated
Framework: null
What earns full marks: Comprehensive, chronologically accurate, with precise terminology and clear differentiation of concepts.
Evaluation rubric
Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.
- (a) (a) Stages of human evolution and major hominid forms with time of origin (20 marks) 20 marks
describe— define → structure or process in order → labelled diagram → significance
Must cover
- Early hominins: Sahelanthropus (~7 Mya), Orrorin (~6 Mya), Ardipithecus (5.8–4.4 Mya); Ramapithecus now Sivapithecus (not ancestral)
- Australopithecines (A. anamensis, afarensis, africanus; Paranthropus) with dates and features
- Homo habilis, H. erectus, H. heidelbergensis, H. neanderthalensis, H. sapiens with dates, cranial capacity and tool cultures
- Trends: bipedalism before brain expansion, dental reduction, tool culture; out-of-Africa and Indian evidence (Narmada hominin)
Loses marks
- Presenting Ramapithecus as a human ancestor
- Wrong order or grossly wrong dates
Earns more
- Timeline or phylogenetic chart
- Denisovans and interbreeding
Extra mark
- H. floresiensis and H. naledi as late side branches
- (b) (b) Hardy–Weinberg law; how mutation and genetic drift change gene frequency (15 marks) 15 marks
explain— definition/context → points in order → small example → short close
Must cover
- Statement and assumptions; p² + 2pq + q² = 1; equilibrium after one generation
- Mutation: forward/backward rates, Δp = vq − up, equilibrium q̂ = u/(u+v); slow but source of variation
- Genetic drift: random sampling in small populations, variance pq/2N, fixation/loss, loss of heterozygosity
- Bottleneck and founder effects with examples
Loses marks
- Treating drift as adaptive
- Wrong HW expansion
Earns more
- Worked numerical example
- Effective population size Nₑ
Extra mark
- Neutral theory (Kimura)
- (c) (c) Systematics vs taxonomy; classical vs molecular taxonomy with tools (15 marks) 15 marks
compare— paired headings or point-wise contrast → key differences → significance → conclusion
Must cover
- Systematics: study of diversity and relationships (Simpson); taxonomy: theory and practice of classification and nomenclature
- Classical taxonomy: morphology, anatomy, embryology, cytotaxonomy; tools such as specimens, keys, numerical taxonomy
- Molecular taxonomy: DNA sequencing, barcoding (COI), rRNA, microsatellites/SNPs, RFLP, protein electrophoresis; BLAST, ClustalW, MEGA phylogenies
- Comparison of strengths and limitations; integrative taxonomy
Loses marks
- Using the two terms as identical without distinction
- No tools named
Earns more
- Examples of cryptic species revealed by barcoding
- Cladistics vs phenetics
Extra mark
- Mentions Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD)
What "Describe" is asking you to do
Give a full, ordered account of the thing named — its parts, stages or mechanism — in the sequence in which it actually exists or occurs. Most describe questions come from the science optionals, where the marks sit in correct technical detail and, where the stem says so, a labelled diagram.
Structure that answers it
One-line identification of the subject → the parts or stages in their real order, each with its defining detail → labelled diagram where the subject is structural → closing line on function or significance
Where marks are lost
Loose general prose where the examiner is ticking named parts, correct terminology and their sequence; and in the General Studies papers, turning to evaluation before the description is finished.
Practice this exact question
Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.
Evaluate my answer →More from Zoology 2024 Paper II
- Q1 Write on the following in about 150 words each: (a) Polytene chromosome (10 marks) (b) Di…
- Q2 (a) Give an account of ultrastructure of rough and smooth endoplasmic reticulum. Also dis…
- Q3 (a) What is sex-determination? Give an account of genic balance theory of sex-determinati…
- Q4 (a) Describe the stages of human evolution and mention the major hominid forms giving the…
- Q5 Write on the following in about 150 words each: (a) Functions of immunoglobulins (10 mark…
- Q6 (a) Explain the structure of nephron and its role in urine formation. Add a note on hormo…
- Q7 (a) Describe the process of spermatogenesis. Add a note on the role of Golgi bodies in th…