Q7
(a) Discuss about Micro-Irrigation Systems and their advantages in Indian Agriculture. (20 marks) (b) Describe the procedure of making successful farm plan. Write the characteristics of good farm planning. (20 marks) (c) Explain about Participatory Rural Appraisal technique for farmers' need identification. (10 marks)
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a) सूक्ष्म सिंचाई प्रणालियों की विवेचना करें तथा भारतीय कृषि में इनके फायदे बताएँ । (20 अंक) (b) सफल प्रक्षेत्र योजना बनाने की प्रक्रिया का वर्णन करें । अच्छी प्रक्षेत्र नियोजन की विशेषताओं को लिखें । (20 अंक) (c) किसानों की आवश्यकताओं की पहचान के लिए सहभागी ग्रामीण मूल्यांकन तकनीक की व्याख्या करें । (10 अंक)
Directive word: Discuss
This question asks you to discuss. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.
See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
The directive 'discuss' for part (a) requires balanced coverage of types, functioning, and advantages with critical evaluation; parts (b) and (c) use 'describe' and 'explain' respectively, demanding systematic procedure narration and conceptual clarity. Allocate approximately 40% of time/words to part (a) given its 20 marks, 35% to part (b) as it has two components (procedure + characteristics), and 25% to part (c). Structure with a brief integrated introduction, three distinct sectional bodies with clear sub-headings, and a conclusion linking micro-irrigation efficiency, farm planning precision, and PRA's participatory approach to sustainable agriculture.
Key points expected
- Part (a): Types of micro-irrigation (drip, sprinkler, micro-sprinkler, bubbler) with component details; water use efficiency data (40-70% savings vs. flood irrigation); advantages including yield enhancement (30-100% increase), fertilizer use efficiency, weed control, and suitability for undulating terrain
- Part (a) Indian context: PMKSY-PDMC, state adoption patterns (Gujarat, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh), challenges like high initial cost, clogging, and power reliability
- Part (b): Step-wise farm planning procedure—resource inventory, goal setting, enterprise selection, budgeting, implementation, monitoring and control; characteristics of good planning—flexibility, profitability, sustainability, risk mitigation, resource optimization, and time-bound execution
- Part (b): Integration of crop-livestock-fishery components, use of linear programming/ budgeting tools, and contingency planning for market/weather risks
- Part (c): PRA techniques—transect walks, social mapping, seasonal calendars, Venn diagrams, pairwise ranking; principles of reversibility, triangulation, and opt-out; application in identifying farmer needs for technology dissemination and watershed development
Evaluation rubric
| Dimension | Weight | Max marks | Excellent | Average | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concept correctness | 25% | 12.5 | Precise technical definitions across all parts: for (a) distinguishes drip vs. sprinkler components (emitters, laterals, filters); for (b) correctly sequences planning steps and distinguishes strategic vs. operational planning; for (c) accurately describes at least 4 PRA tools and their specific applications in need assessment | Basic definitions present but some technical inaccuracies—confuses micro-irrigation types, omits key planning steps, or describes PRA superficially without tool specificity | Major conceptual errors—treats micro-irrigation as synonymous with sprinkler only, presents farm planning as mere crop selection, or confuses PRA with conventional survey methods |
| Quantitative reasoning | 15% | 7.5 | Integrates relevant data: water application efficiency (90% drip vs. 35-40% flood), WUE improvements, cost-benefit ratios (1:2.5 to 1:4 for MI), farm planning numerical examples (Gross Income - Variable Cost = Farm Business Income), and PRA sample sizes for validity | Mentions some figures but lacks precision or context—quotes 'water saving' without percentages, gives generic yield increase ranges without crop specificity | No quantitative content or seriously flawed numbers that undermine credibility of analysis |
| Indian context examples | 20% | 10 | Rich geographically diverse illustrations: for (a) Gujarat's Jyotigram scheme, Maharashtra's sugarcane drip adoption, Israel-India drip irrigation collaboration; for (b) FPO-based planning in Bihar, tribal farm plans in NE India; for (c) PRA in Sukhomajri, Ralegan Siddhi, or MGNREGA watershed projects | Generic mention of PMKSY or one-state example only; farm planning lacks regional adaptation; PRA mentioned without concrete Indian implementation cases | No Indian examples or inappropriate foreign case studies dominating; fails to connect any concept to Indian agricultural realities |
| Diagram / process | 20% | 10 | Clear schematic diagrams: for (a) drip irrigation layout with head, main, sub-main, lateral, and emitter; for (b) flowchart of farm planning process or enterprise combination matrix; for (c) social map or seasonal calendar diagram; all properly labelled and referenced in text | Describes diagrams in words without actual sketching, or presents poorly labelled diagrams that lack integration with explanation | No visual representation; dense text without any attempt to illustrate systems, processes, or participatory tools diagrammatically |
| Policy / extension angle | 20% | 10 | Critical policy analysis: for (a) evaluates PMKSY-PDMC subsidies (55-75%), Direct Benefit Transfer challenges, and convergence with MGNREGA for MI; for (b) links to ATMA, KVK advisory services, and digitization (KisanSarathi); for (c) connects PRA to National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) and farmer-to-farmer extension | Lists policies without critical evaluation—mentions PMKSY or ATMA without implementation gaps or success factors; PRA linked generically to 'government schemes' | Isolated from policy context; no mention of extension systems, subsidy mechanisms, or institutional frameworks supporting these agricultural interventions |
Practice this exact question
Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.
Evaluate my answer →More from Agriculture 2022 Paper I
- Q1 Describe the following in about 150 words each: (a) What is "Geographic Information System" (GIS) ? Discuss its elements and prospects in a…
- Q2 (a) Write the various factors responsible for soil pollution. How organic and natural farming can play role in minimizing soil pollution ?…
- Q3 (a) How soil acidity affects crop production ? Elaborate the remedial procedures of soil acidity. (20 marks) (b) Classify various natural r…
- Q4 (a) Discuss about the types of herbicide resistance in weeds with specific example in Indian perspective. Discuss the management practices…
- Q5 Discuss the followings in about 150 words each: (a) Self Help Groups (SHGs) and Farmers Producers Organizations (FPOs) (10 marks) (b) Kisan…
- Q6 (a) What are the target groups in Agricultural Extension ? What role KVKs can play to reach such target groups ? (20 marks) (b) Narrate var…
- Q7 (a) Discuss about Micro-Irrigation Systems and their advantages in Indian Agriculture. (20 marks) (b) Describe the procedure of making succ…
- Q8 (a) Discuss the various parameters of quality of irrigation water. Write irrigation scheduling for pulses cultivation in arid and semi-arid…