Anthropology 2021 Paper I 50 marks Discuss

Paper I — Q2

(a) What are the physical and cultural characteristics of Homo erectus? Discuss its phylogenetic status. (20 marks) (b) Elucidate…

(a)

What are the physical and cultural characteristics of Homo erectus? Discuss its phylogenetic status. 20 marks

(b)

Elucidate the concept of "thick description" of Clifford Geertz with a suitable example. 15 marks

(c)

Describe the features of early farming cultures and Neolithic of the Near East. 15 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a)

होमो इरेक्टस की शारीरिक और सांस्कृतिक विशेषताएँ क्या हैं ? इसकी फाइलोजेनेटिक स्थिति की विवेचना कीजिए। (20 अंक)

(b)

एक उपयुक्त उदाहरण के साथ क्लिफोर्ड गीर्ट्ज के "थोस विवरण" की अवधारणा को स्पष्ट कीजिए। (15 अंक)

(c)

प्रारंभिक कृषि संस्कृतियों और निकट पूर्व के नवपाषाण काल की विशेषताओं का वर्णन कीजिए। (15 अंक)

Q2 of the 2021 UPSC Mains Anthropology Paper I, as printed
The question as printed in the 2021 Anthropology paper

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

(a) Homo erectus: characteristics and phylogenetic status

Physical: cranial capacity 650–1,250 cc (mean about 900), rising over time. The skull is long and low, with a receding forehead, thick vault bones, a heavy supraorbital torus, post-orbital constriction, a sagittal keel, an angular occipital torus, greatest breadth low down, a projecting face and no chin; teeth are smaller than in australopithecines. The postcranium is modern: the Nariokotome boy (KNM-WT 15000, about 1.5 Ma) shows tall, long-legged, narrow-hipped proportions, obligate striding bipedalism and reduced sexual dimorphism.

Cultural: Acheulian handaxes and cleavers show planning and symmetry; Attirampakkam in Tamil Nadu has Acheulian tools from about 1.5 Ma. Controlled fire is secure from about 0.8 Ma (Gesher Benot Ya'aqov), while the Zhoukoudian evidence is disputed. Scavenging and hunting, a meat-rich diet, home bases and cooperation are inferred. H. erectus (African forms often called H. ergaster) was the first hominin to disperse out of Africa: Dmanisi (about 1.8 Ma), Sangiran and Trinil in Java (Dubois, 1891), and Zhoukoudian near Beijing.

Phylogenetic status: it probably evolved in Africa about 1.9 Ma from early Homo (H. habilis or H. rudolfensis). Splitters assign African forms to H. ergaster, ancestor of H. heidelbergensis and then H. sapiens, and treat Asian H. erectus as an extinct side branch (late survivors at Ngandong, Java). Lumpers keep one variable species, which Multiregionalism links to modern Asians; the Out-of-Africa model rejects that.

(b) Geertz's "thick description"

Gilbert Ryle contrasted a twitch with a wink and with a parody of a wink: the physical movement, "thin description", is identical, but the meaning differs. Clifford Geertz borrowed this in "Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture", the opening essay of The Interpretation of Cultures (1973). For Geertz, culture is "webs of significance" that humans spin and are suspended in; anthropology is therefore "not an experimental science in search of law but an interpretive one in search of meaning". The ethnographer records behaviour with its context, the codes that make it intelligible and the actors' own interpretations (the emic view), and reads it like a text.

Example: the Balinese cockfight ("Deep Play", 1972). Thin description records roosters, spurs and bets. Thick description shows that the fight dramatises village and kin rivalry and status: men identify with their birds, high-stakes "deep play" matches rivals of equal standing, and prestige matters more than money. The cockfight is "a story they tell themselves about themselves". Geertz and his wife were accepted by villagers only after fleeing a police raid on an illegal match.

Critics, Marxist and feminist, fault the approach for subjectivity and neglect of power.

(c) Early farming cultures and the Neolithic of the Near East

Background: the Natufians (about 15,000–11,500 BP, Levant) were sedentary or semi-sedentary foragers with stone houses, sickles, querns and cemeteries; the Younger Dryas cold, dry spell (about 12,900–11,700 BP) is linked to their turn to cultivation.

Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (about 11,500–10,500 BP): Jericho with its stone wall and tower, Netiv Hagdud, and the monumental T-pillar enclosures of Göbekli Tepe; cultivation of wild-type cereals. Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (about 10,500–8,700 BP): fully domesticated emmer and einkorn wheat, barley, lentil, pea and chickpea; goats and sheep, later cattle and pigs; rectangular plastered mud-brick houses at Jericho, Çayönü and 'Ain Ghazal; plastered skulls and statues; storage and grinding stones. Pottery Neolithic (from about 8,500 BP): pottery (Hassuna, Halaf), polished axes, weaving, and large settlements such as Çatalhöyük (from about 7100 BCE) with wall paintings and burials under floors.

Social change: sedentism, population growth, storage, craft specialisation, ritual centres and emerging inequality.

How this answer will be evaluated

Framework: UPSC Anthropology Paper 1 (Physical & Social)

What earns full marks: Comprehensive, specific, well-structured, with named sites/thinkers and diagrams.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) Physical/cultural traits of Homo erectus and its phylogenetic status. 20 marks

    discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close

    Must cover

    • Physical traits: bipedalism, brain size, robust build
    • Cultural traits: stone tools, fire use, migration
    • Phylogenetic status: link to H. sapiens
    • Mention key sites: Java, Peking, Africa

    Loses marks

    • Confusing H. erectus with H. habilis
    • Ignoring the phylogenetic status part
    • No mention of specific fossil sites

    Earns more

    • Mention of the Acheulean industry (handaxes, cleavers)
    • Reference to specific fossils (Nariokotome, Dmanisi)
    • Discussion of 'Out of Africa' vs 'Multiregional' debate

    Extra mark

    • Labelled skull or tool diagram
    • Specific dates (e.g., 1.8 Ma)
  2. (b) Clifford Geertz's 'thick description' concept with a suitable example. 15 marks

    explain— definition/context → points in order → small example → short close

    Must cover

    • Define 'thick description' (interpretive anthropology)
    • Contrast with 'thin description' (Ryle)
    • Provide a suitable example (e.g., winking)
    • Explain the role of context in meaning

    Loses marks

    • Treating it as a general description method
    • No example provided
    • Confusing with 'thick data' in other fields

    Earns more

    • Reference to Clifford Geertz's 'The Interpretation of Cultures'
    • Mention of 'webs of significance'
    • Link to ethnographic fieldwork methodology

    Extra mark

    • Specific quote from Geertz
    • Comparison with other interpretive anthropologists
  3. (c) Features of early farming cultures and Neolithic of the Near East. 15 marks

    describe— define → structure or process in order → labelled diagram → significance

    Must cover

    • Define 'Neolithic Revolution' in Near East context
    • List key features: domestication, settlement, tools
    • Mention specific sites (e.g., Jericho, Çatalhöyük)
    • Describe social changes (hierarchy, storage)

    Loses marks

    • Confusing with Neolithic of other regions
    • No mention of specific sites
    • Ignoring the 'farming' aspect

    Earns more

    • Mention specific crops (wheat, barley)
    • Reference to 'Pre-Pottery Neolithic' (PPN) phases
    • Discussion of 'Natufian' precursor culture

    Extra mark

    • Map of Near East sites
    • Specific dates for Neolithic phases
What "Discuss" is asking you to do

Lay the issue out from more than one side — how it arose, what is claimed for it, what is held against it, and where it now stands. UPSC attaches discuss to broad topics with several live dimensions, so coverage of the dimensions earns more than the strength of your opinion.

Structure that answers it

Set the issue up → the case as it is made → the case against → the dimension both sides leave out → where the balance now lies

Where marks are lost

Listing facts with no thread between them, or arguing one side throughout and calling it a discussion.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Anthropology 2021 Paper I

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in