Anthropology 2021 Paper I 50 marks Explain

Paper I — Q3

(a) How do political organisations of simple societies establish power, authority and legitimacy? (20 marks) (b) Explain the…

(a)

How do political organisations of simple societies establish power, authority and legitimacy? 20 marks

(b)

Explain the genetic mechanisms of micro and macro evolution. 15 marks

(c)

Discuss the salient features of different traditions of European Mesolithic. 15 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a)

साधारण समाजों के राजनीतिक संगठन शक्ति, सत्ता और वैधता कैसे स्थापित करते हैं ? (20 अंक)

(b)

सूक्ष्म और दीर्घ उद्विकास के आनुवंशिक तंत्रों की व्याख्या कीजिए । (15 अंक)

(c)

मध्यपाषाणकालीन यूरोप की विभिन्न परंपराओं की मुख्य विशेषताओं की चर्चा कीजिए । (15 अंक)

Q3 of the 2021 UPSC Mains Anthropology Paper I, as printed
The question as printed in the 2021 Anthropology paper

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

(a) Power, authority and legitimacy in simple societies

Following Weber, power is the ability to secure compliance, authority is power accepted as rightful, and legitimacy is the shared belief that makes it so. In simple societies these rest on kinship, ritual and reciprocity rather than a state apparatus.

Bands: leadership is egalitarian and situational, based on age, skill and persuasion. Among the !Kung or Inuit a headman has no coercive power; decisions are by consensus, and leveling mechanisms such as ridiculing a boastful hunter (Lee) and fission of the band curb domination.

Tribes: authority is dispersed. Segmentary lineage systems (Fortes and Evans-Pritchard, African Political Systems, 1940) among the Nuer and Tallensi keep order through balanced opposition, feud and mediation by a leopard-skin chief. Melanesian big-men (Sahlins) earn followers by feasting and gift-exchange, so their authority is achieved and precarious. Age-sets (Maasai) and councils of elders resolve disputes. Indian examples are the Munda-Oraon parha and Santhal manjhi-parganait councils and the Naga village council.

Chiefdoms: authority is ascribed. Hereditary chiefs redistribute goods and claim descent from ancestors or gods, as the Shilluk divine king did (Evans-Pritchard) and Polynesian chiefs with mana; the Khasi syiem rules with clan councils.

Legitimacy comes from tradition, genealogy, ritual, charisma and generosity. Sanctions are mostly informal: gossip, ridicule, ostracism, oaths, ordeals, witchcraft accusation and ritual sanction, backed by feud in stateless societies.

(b) Genetic mechanisms of micro- and macroevolution

Microevolution is change in allele frequencies within a population over a few generations; Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p² + 2pq + q² = 1) is the null model, and it breaks when any of the following operates.

  • Mutation creates new alleles, such as the single-base change giving HbS; it is slow but is the raw material.
  • Natural selection changes frequencies by differential reproduction: directional, stabilising or balancing, as when heterozygote advantage maintains HbS in malarial regions.
  • Genetic drift, strongest in small populations, as in founder effects and bottlenecks.
  • Gene flow (migration) and non-random mating alter frequencies and homogeneity.

Macroevolution is evolution above the species level: the origin of new species, genera and body plans, adaptive radiations and extinctions. Its genetic basis is largely the same microevolutionary processes accumulated over geological time, plus reproductive isolation: allopatric speciation once gene flow stops, sympatric speciation by polyploidy, and chromosomal rearrangements. Human chromosome 2 arose by fusion of two ape chromosomes. Gene duplication produced the globin family; changes in regulatory and Hox genes alter body plans (evo-devo). Punctuated equilibrium (Eldredge and Gould, 1972) explains rapid speciation with long stasis.

(c) European Mesolithic traditions

The Mesolithic (about 11,700 to 6,000 BP in the north, ending earlier where farming arrived) followed Holocene warming, which spread forests of pine, birch, hazel and oak and shifted hunting to red deer, roe deer, aurochs, wild boar, fish and shellfish. Common features are microlithic composite tools, bows, axes and adzes, dugout canoes, domesticated dogs and growing regional diversity.

  • Azilian (south-west France, northern Spain): painted pebbles, flat antler harpoons and small round-backed points; Mas d'Azil is the type site.
  • Sauveterrian and Tardenoisian (France, Belgium, Italy): geometric microliths, triangles then trapezes, for arrow tips.
  • Maglemosian (North Sea plain, southern Scandinavia, Britain): flint microliths and tranchet axes, bone and antler points, wooden paddles; Star Carr in Yorkshire shows red-deer antler headdresses and lakeside camps.
  • Ertebølle (southern Scandinavia, about 5400–3900 BCE): coastal fishing, large shell middens, dugouts, cemeteries and late pointed-base pottery adopted by foragers.
  • Obanian and Larnian (Scotland, Ireland): shell middens and the Mount Sandel huts.
  • Lepenski Vir (Danube Iron Gates): trapezoidal houses and carved boulders of riverine fishers.

Contrast with the Upper Palaeolithic: smaller, more sedentary territories, and many traditions that cannot be treated as one Mesolithic.

How this answer will be evaluated

What earns full marks: Comprehensive, well-structured, with specific examples and theoretical grounding.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) Mechanisms of power, authority, and legitimacy in simple societies. 20 marks

    explain— definition/context → points in order → small example → short close

    Must cover

    • Define power, authority, and legitimacy
    • Explain role of elders and chiefs
    • Discuss consensus and ritual authority
    • Provide ethnographic examples

    Loses marks

    • Sociological definitions without anthropological context
    • Ignoring the 'simple society' constraint
    • Confusing state power with tribal authority

    Earns more

    • Reference to Malinowski or Radcliffe-Brown
    • Mention of specific tribal case
    • Distinction between power and authority
    • Discussion of sanctions

    Extra mark

    • Reference to Indian tribal context
    • Contrast with state-level legal authority
  2. (b) Genetic mechanisms driving micro and macro evolution. 15 marks

    explain— definition/context → points in order → small example → short close

    Must cover

    • Define micro and macro evolution
    • Explain mutation and recombination
    • Discuss natural selection and drift
    • Link mechanisms to evolutionary change

    Loses marks

    • Lamarckian explanations
    • Ignoring genetic basis of evolution
    • Confusing micro and macro mechanisms

    Earns more

    • Mention of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
    • Reference to specific geneticist
    • Distinction between gene and species level
    • Example of a specific mutation

    Extra mark

    • Reference to human evolution example
    • Mention of specific fossil evidence
  3. (c) Salient features of different European Mesolithic traditions. 15 marks

    discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close

    Must cover

    • Define European Mesolithic
    • Identify different traditions
    • Describe tool technologies
    • Discuss subsistence strategies

    Loses marks

    • Generalizing all Mesolithic as one
    • Ignoring regional variations
    • Confusing Mesolithic with Neolithic

    Earns more

    • Mention of specific sites
    • Reference to specific archaeologist
    • Discussion of climate impact
    • Comparison of traditions

    Extra mark

    • Reference to specific tool type
    • Mention of specific animal species
What "Explain" is asking you to do

Make the working of something clear — what sets it off, what follows from what, and what it produces. Explain is the Commission's mechanism word: it dominates the technical papers and the “explain why” stems, where the marks sit in the causal chain and not in the label.

Structure that answers it

State what it is → the initiating condition → the chain of cause, step by step → an instance where it plays out → what the chain produces

Where marks are lost

Describing what something looks like instead of why it works that way. Naming the stages without linking them reads as description too.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Anthropology 2021 Paper I

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in