Paper I — Q7
(a) Critically evaluate different types of social stratifications with suitable examples. (20 marks) (b) Discuss the bio-social…
Critically evaluate different types of social stratifications with suitable examples. 20 marks
Discuss the bio-social determinants of fertility and fecundity. 15 marks
What is Anthropometry? Discuss its role in assessing the nutritional status and sports capability of a person. 15 marks
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
उपयुक्त उदाहरणों के साथ विभिन्न प्रकार के सामाजिक स्तरीकरणों का समालोचनात्मक मूल्यांकन कीजिए । (20 अंक)
उर्वरता और प्रजनन-क्षमता के जैव-सामाजिक निर्धारकों की चर्चा कीजिए । (15 अंक)
मानवमिति क्या है ? किसी व्यक्ति की पोषण स्थिति और खेल क्षमता का आकलन करने में इसकी भूमिका की चर्चा कीजिए । (15 अंक)
Model answer
Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.
(a) Types of Social Stratification: A Critical Evaluation Social stratification is the structured, ranked inequality of groups in access to wealth, power and prestige (Weber's three dimensions). Its main types differ in basis and rigidity.
Slavery rests on legal ownership of persons, as in ancient Rome and the American South. Estates are legally defined orders with fixed rights, as in feudal Europe (clergy, nobility, commoners). Caste is ascribed by birth, hierarchical, endogamous and linked to occupation and ritual purity, as in India. Class is based on economic position and is achieved, so in principle open, as in modern industrial societies, whether defined by ownership (Marx) or by market situation (Weber). Tribal societies are mostly egalitarian, as among the Nagas, though chiefs and clan ranking appear among the Khasi and Kachin.
Critique: Caste is often taken as closed, yet Srinivas showed positional mobility through Sanskritisation and the role of the dominant caste, though this changes position, not the structure. Dumont's emphasis on purity and pollution ignores power, and Béteille finds that class and caste now overlap. Untouchability was abolished by Article 17, yet inequality persists, and Dalit assertion, reservations and political mobilisation are changing hierarchy. Class is called open, but Bourdieu's work on reproduction of capital shows that inheritance limits mobility, and Indian class and caste overlap in education and employment. Comparing the Western class and Indian caste shows that class stresses achievement and caste ascription, but both reproduce inequality, and the two are better seen as a continuum.
(b) Bio-social Determinants of Fertility and Fecundity Fecundity is the biological capacity to reproduce; fertility is the actual reproductive performance, measured by births, for example Total Fertility Rate (TFR). Fertility is always below fecundity.
Biological determinants: age (female fecundity peaks in the twenties and falls after 35), age at menarche and menopause, nutrition and body fat, health (anaemia, STIs, PCOS, endometriosis), male sperm quality, lactational amenorrhoea and genetic factors. Primary and secondary sterility lower fertility.
Social determinants: age at marriage, marital stability, education and women's work, contraceptive and abortion use, breastfeeding and postpartum taboos, son preference, religion, income, urbanisation, and infant mortality, as parents replace lost children. Maternal mortality affects both.
Davis and Blake's intermediate variables, and Bongaarts' proximate determinants (marriage, contraception, abortion, lactational infecundability), show how social variables act through biology. Fertility falls with demographic transition: India's TFR was about 2.0 in NFHS-5 (2019-21), below replacement of 2.1.
(c) Anthropometry: Nutritional Status and Sports Capability Anthropometry is the systematic measurement of the human body's size, shape and composition, using the anthropometer, stadiometer, spreading and sliding calipers, skinfold calipers and tape.
Nutritional status: weight-for-height, height-for-age and weight-for-age, judged against WHO growth standards (2006), identify wasting, stunting and underweight in children; NFHS-5 found about 35.5% of Indian children under five stunted. Mid-upper-arm circumference screens acute malnutrition. In adults, BMI classifies underweight (below 18.5) and overweight (Asian cut-off 23); waist-hip ratio and skinfolds show fat distribution. Growth charts track individuals.
Sports capability: somatotyping (Heath-Carter endomorphy, mesomorphy, ectomorphy) matches build to events, such as ectomorphic marathoners and mesomorphic sprinters. Limb length, arm span, height and body-fat percentage help talent identification, favouring tall basketball players and light, compact gymnasts. Body composition is measured by skinfolds, bioimpedance and DEXA, to plan training and diet. Standard ISAK protocols give reliable data.
How this answer will be evaluated
Framework: UPSC Anthropology Paper 1 (Social Anthropology & Biological Anthropology)
What earns full marks: Comprehensive, critical, and well-structured with specific examples and theoretical references.
Evaluation rubric
Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.
- (a) Critical analysis of social stratification types with examples. 20 marks
critically evaluate— positives → negatives/limits → conditions/safeguards → conclusion
Must cover
- Define social stratification and its criteria
- Distinguish caste, class, and estate systems
- Provide suitable examples for each type
- Critically evaluate the rigidity and fluidity of systems
Loses marks
- Descriptive listing without critical evaluation
- Confusing caste with class
- Ignoring the 'suitable examples' requirement
Earns more
- Reference to Kroeber or Srinivas
- Mention of 'Dominant Caste' concept
- Comparison of Western class vs Indian caste
- Reference to 'Sanskritization' or 'Westernization'
Extra mark
- Reference to specific tribal stratification (e.g., Naga)
- Mention of modern mobility (e.g., Dalit politics)
- (b) Discussion of biological and social factors affecting fertility. 15 marks
discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close
Must cover
- Define fertility and fecundity
- Identify biological determinants (age, health)
- Identify social determinants (marriage, education)
- Link biological and social factors
Loses marks
- Confusing fertility with fecundity
- Ignoring biological factors
- Ignoring social factors
Earns more
- Mention of 'Demographic Transition Theory'
- Reference to 'Total Fertility Rate' (TFR)
- Discussion of 'Fertility vs Fecundity' gap
- Mention of 'Contraceptive use' as a factor
Extra mark
- Reference to specific Indian demographic data
- Mention of 'Maternal Mortality' impact
- (c) Definition of anthropometry and its role in nutrition/sports. 15 marks
explain— definition/context → points in order → small example → short close
Must cover
- Define anthropometry
- Explain role in assessing nutritional status
- Explain role in assessing sports capability
- Mention specific measurements (height, weight, BMI)
Loses marks
- Defining anthropometry incorrectly
- Ignoring the 'sports capability' aspect
- Ignoring the 'nutritional status' aspect
Earns more
- Mention of 'Body Mass Index' (BMI)
- Reference to 'Body Composition' analysis
- Mention of 'Somatotypes' (Endomorph, Mesomorph)
- Reference to 'Growth Charts'
Extra mark
- Mention of 'DEXA scan' or 'Bioimpedance'
- Reference to 'Sports Anthropometry' applications
What "Critically evaluate" is asking you to do
Judge how well something has performed against the standard it set for itself — its stated aim, mandate or promise — and commit to a verdict. Name the yardstick before you judge; an unanchored judgement reads as opinion. “Critically” is not a section added at the end: name the yardstick you are judging by — the evidence, the stated objective, a constitutional principle, a rival explanation — and let a verdict close each part of the body. Where the question quotes a claim, that verdict must land on the claim itself, accepted, qualified or rejected, and not on the theme in general.
Structure that answers it
Name the yardstick — stated aim, mandate or benchmark → performance against it → shortfall against it → why the gap exists → verdict
Where marks are lost
Merits in one paragraph, demerits in the next, and a conclusion calling for a balanced and holistic approach. That is a survey with the judgement left out and it holds the answer in the middle band. The opposite error is reading “critically” as permission to attack — and with the odd pairings, critically describe or critically explain, the exposition still carries most of the marks, the judgement being a layer on it rather than a substitute for it.
Practice this exact question
Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.
Evaluate my answer →More from Anthropology 2021 Paper I
- Q4 (a) Elaborate the scope of anthropology and elucidate its uniqueness in the field of othe…
- Q5 Write notes on the following in about 150 words each: (a) Human adolescent growth spurt (…
- Q6 (a) What is acclimatization? Discuss adaptive responses to high altitude and cold climate…
- Q7 (a) Critically evaluate different types of social stratifications with suitable examples.…
- Q8 (a) Discuss various tools of data collection in conducting anthropological research. (20…