Anthropology 2021 Paper II 50 marks Explain

Q3

(a) Explain the impact of the concept of nature-man-spirit complex on sustainable use of natural resources with suitable examples. (20 marks) (b) Examine the contributions of S. C. Roy in highlighting the role of customary laws in tribal life. (15 marks) (c) Critically assess the impact of Christianity on tribal culture and identity. (15 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) प्राकृतिक संसाधनों के सतत उपयोग पर प्रकृति-मानव-आत्मा संकुल अवधारणा के प्रभाव का उपयुक्त उदाहरण के साथ वर्णन कीजिए। (20 अंक) (b) जनजातीय जीवन में प्रथानुगत विधि की भूमिका को प्रमुखता देने पर एस० सी० राय के योगदानों का परीक्षण कीजिए। (15 अंक) (c) जनजातीय संस्कृति एवं अस्मिता पर ईसाईयत के प्रभाव का समीक्षात्मक मूल्यांकन कीजिए। (15 अंक)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2021 Anthropology questions

Directive word: Explain

This question asks you to explain. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'explain' demands conceptual clarity with causal linkages. Structure: brief introduction defining the nature-man-spirit complex; Part (a) ~40% word budget (20 marks) — explain the concept through Radcliffe-Brown/Malinowski lineage, then demonstrate sustainable resource use via sacred groves, taboos, and ritual conservation; Part (b) ~30% (15 marks) — examine S.C. Roy's ethnographic method in The Mundas and Their Country, highlighting customary laws (dispute resolution, land tenure, inheritance); Part (c) ~30% (15 marks) — critically assess Christianity's impact through education/health benefits versus cultural erosion, identity fragmentation, and resistance movements. Conclude with integrated reflection on indigenous knowledge systems' contemporary relevance.

Key points expected

  • (a) Nature-man-spirit complex: Define as holistic worldview where nature, humans, and supernatural are interconnected; cite Malinowski's functionalism or Radcliffe-Brown's structural-functionalism as theoretical anchor
  • (a) Sustainable resource use: Explain how ritual prohibitions, sacred groves (kavu in Kerala, devban in Himachal), and seasonal taboos function as informal conservation mechanisms
  • (b) S.C. Roy's contributions: Highlight his insider-outsider methodology, documentation of Munda customary laws (parha system, village councils), and advocacy for tribal autonomy against colonial legal imposition
  • (b) Customary laws in tribal life: Explain how Roy showed customary laws regulate marriage (sanga), inheritance (primogeniture), and conflict resolution without state apparatus
  • (c) Christianity's impact: Assess dual dimensions — positive (education, healthcare, literacy in Nagaland/Mizoram) and negative (denigration of traditional religion, language loss, identity crisis among Oraon, Munda, Khasi converts)
  • (c) Critical assessment: Examine syncretism versus fundamentalism, tribal church autonomy (Naga Baptist conventions), and movements like Jharkhand Mukti Morcha as identity reclamation

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%10Precisely defines nature-man-spirit complex as non-dualistic worldview; correctly identifies Roy's position as pioneer of Indian ethnography; accurately distinguishes conversion types (Catholic vs. Protestant, colonial vs. post-colonial missions) in (c)Basic definition of concepts without theoretical lineage; treats Roy as mere describer rather than theorist of legal pluralism; describes Christian impact without distinguishing periods or denominationsConfuses nature-man-spirit with environmental determinism; conflates Roy with Elwin or Hutton; presents Christianity's impact as uniformly positive or negative without nuance
Theoretical framing20%10For (a), deploys Malinowski's functionalism or Berkes' traditional ecological knowledge; for (b), uses legal pluralism (Griffiths) or Srinivas' concept of dominant caste adapted to tribal context; for (c), applies acculturation theory (Redfield), revitalization movements (Wallace), or post-colonial critiqueMentions theories without applying them to specific sub-parts; generic reference to 'functionalism' without showing how sacred groves function; describes Roy's work without theoretical framingNo theoretical framework; purely descriptive treatment; misattributes theories (e.g., calling Roy a structural-functionalist)
Ethnographic / Indian examples20%10(a) cites specific sacred groves (Khasi law kyntang, Kodagu devarakadu, Bastar penkutti) with resource management outcomes; (b) references Roy's specific works (The Mundas, The Oraons) with documented customary cases; (c) provides region-specific examples (Naga Baptist identity, Munda Sardar movement, Kerala tribal syncretism)Generic examples (tribes in general, 'some communities'); mentions Roy without specific work titles; lists Christian impacts without regional specificityNon-Indian or invented examples; confuses Roy with other administrators; anachronistic examples (post-1950 events for pre-Independence analysis)
Comparative analysis20%10For (a), compares nature-man-spirit complex with Western conservation models; for (b), contrasts Roy's advocacy with colonial legal positivism (Elwin's protectionism vs. Roy's integration); for (c), compares missionary approaches (Catholic inculturation vs. Protestant fundamentalism) or pre/post-conversion social structuresImplicit comparison without explicit framing; mentions 'difference from mainstream' without elaboration; contrasts without explaining significanceNo comparative element; treats each sub-part in isolation; false comparisons (e.g., comparing Roy to contemporary activists)
Conclusion & applied angle20%10Synthesizes three parts: argues for recognition of customary laws (Roy) and indigenous cosmologies (nature-man-spirit) in contemporary tribal policy; addresses current relevance (Forest Rights Act 2006, PESA, tribal sub-plan); proposes balanced approach to development preserving cultural identitySummarizes main points without synthesis; generic policy recommendation without connection to question parts; no contemporary relevanceNo conclusion; abrupt ending; conclusion contradicts body (e.g., advocating modernization after praising traditional conservation)

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Anthropology 2021 Paper II