Anthropology 2023 Paper I 50 marks Critically discuss

Paper I — Q6

(a) Critically discuss the controversies related to fieldwork of Bronislaw Malinowski and Margaret Mead. 20 (b) Discuss the…

(a)

Critically discuss the controversies related to fieldwork of Bronislaw Malinowski and Margaret Mead. 20 marks

(b)

Discuss the impact of globalization on the economic systems of indigenous communities. 15 marks

(c)

Describe the practical applications of DNA technology in the current scenario. 15 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a)

ब्रॉनिस्लॉ मैलिनोव्स्की तथा मार्ग्रेट मीड के क्षेत्रीय कार्यों से संबंधित विवादों की समालोचनात्मक विवेचना कीजिए । 20

(b)

देशज समुदायों की आर्थिक व्यवस्थाओं पर वैश्वीकरण के प्रभाव की विवेचना कीजिए । 15

(c)

वर्तमान परिदृश्य में डीएनए प्रौद्योगिकी के व्यावहारिक अनुप्रयोगों का विवरण प्रस्तुत कीजिए । 15

Q6 of the 2023 UPSC Mains Anthropology Paper I, as printed
The question as printed in the 2023 Anthropology paper

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

(a) Controversies related to fieldwork of Malinowski and Margaret Mead

Malinowski: his fieldwork in the Trobriand Islands (1915–18) set the standard of long-stay, participant observation in the native language, and gave functionalism its authority (Argonauts of the Western Pacific, 1922). The posthumous A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term (1967) showed a private side: irritation, prejudiced remarks about the islanders, loneliness and sexual preoccupation, which contrasted with the sympathetic published account. The controversy raised questions about objectivity, the "native's point of view" (Geertz), colonial context, and the ethics of the fieldworker's relations.

Mead: Coming of Age in Samoa (1928) argued that Samoan adolescence was free of storm and stress, supporting Boasian cultural determinism. Derek Freeman (1983) challenged her, arguing that she spent a short time, had limited command of language, relied on a few young informants who may have exaggerated, and misjudged Samoan society, which he described as competitive and restrictive. Defenders (Lowell Holmes, Shankman) noted that Freeman overstated his case and selected evidence, and that Mead's broader point about cultural variation stands. Later claims about informant hoaxing remain disputed.

Consequences: both cases led to the reflexive turn and "crisis of representation" (Clifford and Marcus, Writing Culture, 1986), greater attention to fieldwork ethics, positionality and methodological transparency.

(b) Impact of globalization on the economic systems of indigenous communities

Indigenous economies such as those of the Birhor, Kadar and Onge were based on subsistence, reciprocity, community resource ownership and non-timber forest produce. Globalization has pulled them into markets and altered them.

  • Negative: land alienation and displacement by mining, dams and industry; loss of commons and of food security; shift from subsistence to wage labour, often unorganised, and to debt; erosion of traditional crafts by cheap goods; exploitation by middlemen; and heavier burdens on women as forest resources shrink. Resistance includes the Narmada Bachao Andolan and the Dongria Kondh's Niyamgiri campaign against bauxite mining.
  • Positive: cash income, markets for minor forest produce and crafts, tourism, better communication and welfare access.
  • Safeguards: the Fifth and Sixth Schedules, PESA (1996), the Forest Rights Act (2006) and minimum support price for minor forest produce, though weakly enforced.

The result is integration on unequal terms, with dependency and cultural change.

(c) Practical applications of DNA technology in the current scenario

  • Forensics: DNA profiling by short tandem repeats and mitochondrial DNA identifies offenders and victims, resolves disputed paternity, and identifies disaster victims.
  • Medicine: diagnosis and prenatal screening of genetic disease (thalassaemia, sickle cell), carrier detection, pharmacogenomics, gene therapy, recombinant drugs such as insulin, and vaccines.
  • Anthropology and population studies: tracing of migrations and ancestry, studies of Indian populations and ancient DNA, and projects such as GenomeIndia.
  • Agriculture and livestock: genetically modified crops, marker-assisted breeding and disease diagnosis.
  • Conservation: identification of wildlife contraband and study of genetic diversity.
  • Other: biosensors, and Ayurgenomics for personalised medicine.

Ethical issues include privacy, informed consent, misuse of data, and genetic discrimination and biopiracy.

How this answer will be evaluated

What earns full marks: All parts show deep analytical engagement with named examples, balanced judgment, and anthropological framing.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) (a) Critically discuss the controversies related to fieldwork of Bronislaw Malinowski and Margaret Mead (20 marks). 20 marks

    critique— the claim → its strengths → its weaknesses → your judgment

    Must cover

    • Malinowski: Trobriand fieldwork and 1967 Diary contrast with published account
    • Mead: Samoa study and Boasian determinism
    • Freeman's 1983 critique and the defence of Mead
    • Consequences: reflexivity, crisis of representation, fieldwork ethics

    Loses marks

    • One-sided acceptance of Freeman.
    • Missing Malinowski diary controversy.

    Earns more

    • Dates and titles.
    • Balanced assessment of Freeman.
    • Colonial context.

    Extra mark

    • Geertz on the native point of view
    • Writing Culture
  2. (b) (b) Discuss the impact of globalization on the economic systems of indigenous communities (15 marks). 15 marks

    discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close

    Must cover

    • Traditional subsistence, reciprocity and forest-based economy
    • Negative effects: displacement, alienation, wage labour, gender impact
    • Positive effects: market, income, access
    • Safeguards and resistance: PESA, FRA, Niyamgiri, NBA

    Loses marks

    • Only positive or only negative account.
    • No Indian examples.

    Earns more

    • Named communities.
    • Middlemen exploitation.

    Extra mark

    • Minimum support price for minor forest produce
    • Cultural change
  3. (c) (c) Describe the practical applications of DNA technology in the current scenario (15 marks). 15 marks

    describe— define → structure or process in order → labelled diagram → significance

    Must cover

    • Forensics: STR profiling and paternity
    • Medicine: screening, pharmacogenomics, gene therapy
    • Population genetics, agriculture and conservation
    • Ethical issues

    Loses marks

    • Only forensic applications.
    • Ignoring ethics.

    Earns more

    • Named Indian initiatives.
    • Disaster victim identification.

    Extra mark

    • Ayurgenomics
    • GenomeIndia
What "Critically discuss" is asking you to do

Lay the issue out from more than one side — how it arose, what is claimed for it, what is held against it, and where it now stands. UPSC attaches discuss to broad topics with several live dimensions, so coverage of the dimensions earns more than the strength of your opinion. “Critically” is not a section added at the end: name the yardstick you are judging by — the evidence, the stated objective, a constitutional principle, a rival explanation — and let a verdict close each part of the body. Where the question quotes a claim, that verdict must land on the claim itself, accepted, qualified or rejected, and not on the theme in general.

Structure that answers it

Set the issue up → the case as it is made → the case against → the dimension both sides leave out → where the balance now lies

Where marks are lost

Merits in one paragraph, demerits in the next, and a conclusion calling for a balanced and holistic approach. That is a survey with the judgement left out and it holds the answer in the middle band. The opposite error is reading “critically” as permission to attack — and with the odd pairings, critically describe or critically explain, the exposition still carries most of the marks, the judgement being a layer on it rather than a substitute for it.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Anthropology 2023 Paper I

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in