Anthropology 2023 Paper II 50 marks Critically comment

Paper II — Q2

(a) "Tribes are backward Hindus." Critically comment with reference to the contributions of G. S. Ghurye. (20 marks) (b) "Indus…

(a)

"Tribes are backward Hindus." Critically comment with reference to the contributions of G. S. Ghurye. 20 marks

(b)

"Indus Valley was the first settlement of the big civilization." Comment critically. 15 marks

(c)

Discuss the basic tenets of Jainism and its impact on Indian society. 15 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a)

"जनजाति पिछड़े हिंदू हैं।" जी० एस० घुर्ये के योगदान के संदर्भ में आलोचनात्मक टिप्पणी कीजिए। (20 अंक)

(b)

"सिंधु घाटी बड़ी सभ्यता की पहली बसाहट थी।" समालोचनात्मक टिप्पणी कीजिए। (15 अंक)

(c)

जैन धर्म के मूल सिद्धांतों और भारतीय समाज पर इसके प्रभाव की चर्चा कीजिए। (15 अंक)

Q2 of the 2023 UPSC Mains Anthropology Paper II, as printed
The question as printed in the 2023 Anthropology paper

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

(a) "Tribes are backward Hindus": critical comment with reference to G.S. Ghurye

Ghurye (The Aborigines So-Called and Their Future, 1943; The Scheduled Tribes, 1959) argued that tribes are "backward Hindus", not a separate category. He held that tribal religion, deities, and customs show Hindu influence, that tribes have long been in contact with and absorbed into Hindu society through assimilation and sometimes caste-like ranking, and that the difference from the Hindu peasantry is one of degree. He therefore favoured integration, and opposed the "isolation" policy of British administrators and Verrier Elwin, which he saw as keeping tribes backward and dividing the nation.

Support: tribe–caste continuum, tribal rulers such as the Gond Rajas becoming Rajputs, and processes of Sanskritisation (Srinivas) and "Hinduisation" (Bose's "Hindu method of tribal absorption") confirm much contact.

Critique:

  • Tribal societies differ in religion (animism), kinship, egalitarian structure, economy, language and land-holding, and many are non-Hindu by belief.
  • Elwin defended tribal distinctiveness and advocated protection; Nehru's Panchsheel for tribal development took a middle course.
  • Tribal communities have resisted assimilation in the assertion of identity (Jharkhand, Sarna code), and scholars like Virginius Xaxa argue that the tribe category is a product of colonial and state recognition.
  • The Constitution (Article 342) recognises Scheduled Tribes by distinctive culture, isolation, shyness of contact and backwardness (Lokur Committee, 1965).
  • The label "backward" ignores tribal agency and the fact that many have been marginalised by colonial and later development.

Ghurye rightly saw the fluid boundary, but his view underestimates tribal autonomy.

(b) "Indus Valley was the first settlement of the big civilization": critical comment

The statement is misleading in two ways. First, the Indus (Harappan) civilisation was not the first large civilisation: Mesopotamia (from about 3500 BCE) and Egypt (about 3100 BCE) came earlier, and it is best seen as one of the four or five early river-valley civilisations. Second, it was not the first settlement in its region; it was a culmination of a long local development.

Mehrgarh (Baluchistan, from about 7000 BCE) shows the earliest farming and herding, followed by the Early Harappan or Hakra, Amri, Kot Diji and Rakhigarhi-Hakra phases, which saw copper use, craft specialisation and planned settlement. The Mature phase (about 2600–1900 BCE) then developed planned cities (Mohenjo-daro, Harappa, Dholavira, Rakhigarhi), standard brick and weights, drainage and seals across a vast area. Its script is undeciphered and its political organisation is unclear.

It was a major, indigenous early urban civilisation with antecedents, not a first settlement.

(c) Basic tenets of Jainism and its impact on Indian society

Jainism is traced to 24 Tirthankaras, of whom Parshvanatha (23rd) and Mahavira (24th, 6th century BCE) are historical.

Tenets:

  • Universe is eternal, with no creator god, and each soul (jiva) is distinct and bound by karma, which is viewed as material particles.
  • Liberation (moksha) by the three jewels: right faith, right knowledge and right conduct.
  • Five vows (mahavratas): ahimsa, satya, asteya, aparigraha and brahmacharya, strictest for monks, and anuvratas for laity.
  • Anekantavada (manifold reality) and syadvada (conditional statement).
  • Asceticism, and the later division into Digambara and Svetambara.

Impact: ahimsa promoted vegetarianism and humane attitudes, and influenced Gandhi. Jain merchants and bankers shaped trade and finance. Jain art and architecture include Dilwara temples (Mount Abu), Gommateshwara at Shravanabelagola and cave shrines. Prakrit, Apabhramsha and regional languages developed through Jain literature. It challenged Vedic ritualism and brought ethics into public life, although Jain society also adopted caste-like features.

How this answer will be evaluated

What earns full marks: Comprehensive, well-structured, with specific examples and critical analysis

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) (a) "Tribes are backward Hindus." Critically comment with reference to the contributions of G.S. Ghurye (20 marks). 20 marks

    critique— the claim → its strengths → its weaknesses → your judgment

    Must cover

    • Ghurye's assimilationist thesis and works
    • Evidence for contact and absorption: Hinduisation, Sanskritisation
    • Critique: Elwin, tribal distinctiveness, Xaxa, constitutional recognition
    • Balanced assessment

    Loses marks

    • Uncritical acceptance of the statement.
    • Confusing Ghurye and Elwin positions.

    Earns more

    • Lokur Committee criteria.
    • Isolation versus integration debate.

    Extra mark

    • Nehru's Panchsheel
    • Sarna code and identity assertion
  2. (b) (b) "Indus Valley was the first settlement of the big civilization." Comment critically (15 marks). 15 marks

    critique— the claim → its strengths → its weaknesses → your judgment

    Must cover

    • Not the first civilization: Mesopotamia and Egypt earlier
    • Antecedents: Mehrgarh, Early Harappan, Kot Diji, Amri
    • Mature phase features
    • Limits: undeciphered script, unclear polity

    Loses marks

    • Accepting the claim uncritically.
    • Ignoring pre-Harappan phases.

    Earns more

    • Dates.
    • Hakra culture.

    Extra mark

    • Rakhigarhi and Dholavira
    • Regional continuity
  3. (c) (c) Discuss the basic tenets of Jainism and its impact on Indian society (15 marks). 15 marks

    discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close

    Must cover

    • Tirthankaras and historical figures Parshvanatha and Mahavira
    • Tenets: karma, triratna, mahavratas, anekantavada, syadvada
    • Sects and asceticism
    • Impact: ethics, trade, art, language, Gandhian influence

    Loses marks

    • Confusing with Buddhism.
    • Listing tenets without impact.

    Earns more

    • Examples of monuments.
    • Critique of caste features.

    Extra mark

    • Prakrit and Apabhramsha literature
    • Vegetarianism
What "Critically comment" is asking you to do

Take a position on the statement and support it. Comment usually attaches to a quoted line in the short slots, so the reasoning must be compressed — an opening view, a few load-bearing reasons, and the limit of the claim. “Critically” is not a section added at the end: name the yardstick you are judging by — the evidence, the stated objective, a constitutional principle, a rival explanation — and let a verdict close each part of the body. Where the question quotes a claim, that verdict must land on the claim itself, accepted, qualified or rejected, and not on the theme in general.

Structure that answers it

Unpack what the statement asserts → your stance → two or three supporting reasons → the qualification that limits it

Where marks are lost

Merits in one paragraph, demerits in the next, and a conclusion calling for a balanced and holistic approach. That is a survey with the judgement left out and it holds the answer in the middle band. The opposite error is reading “critically” as permission to attack — and with the odd pairings, critically describe or critically explain, the exposition still carries most of the marks, the judgement being a layer on it rather than a substitute for it.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Anthropology 2023 Paper II

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in