(a) Elucidate the problems faced by Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups and the major challenges in the formulation of special programmes for their development. (20 marks)
(b) Critically compare Risley's and Sarkar's approaches to the classificatio

Question

(a) Elucidate the problems faced by Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups and the major challenges in the formulation of special programmes for their development. (20 marks)
(b) Critically compare Risley's and Sarkar's approaches to the classification of peoples of India. (15 marks)
(c) Is caste mobility a recent phenomenon? Discuss in the light of Indological and Empirical context. (15 marks)

UPSC Answer Check · Accepted Answer

The study of Indian society requires examining structural vulnerability, biocultural classification, and the dynamics of social stratification across tribal and caste groups.

Problems of PVTGs and Programme Formulation Challenges

Identified following the Dhebar Commission (1960–61) recommendations, Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) face severe marginalization defined by pre-agricultural technology, stagnant or declining populations, extremely low literacy, and subsistence-level economies. Geographic isolation and rapid loss of traditional forest habitats have induced acute nutritional deprivation and endemic genetic vulnerabilities, such as sickle-cell anaemia among central Indian tribes.

Formulating development programmes for PVTGs faces critical institutional and operational challenges:
First, the rigid application of national identification criteria overlooks micro-demographic realities due to an acute deficit of baseline ethnographic and health data. 
Second, bureaucratic delivery mechanisms frequently lack cultural sensitivity, resulting in misplaced interventions. A prominent example is the resettlement of the nomadic Birhor of Jharkhand into brick colonies, which alienated them from their traditional rope-making forest economy and led to livelihood collapse. 
Third, developmental policy remains caught between protectionism and integration. While Conservation-cum-Development (CCD) plans and the PM-PVTG Development Mission aim at holistic growth, they often suffer from centralized implementation, inadequate recognition of habitat rights under the Forest Rights Act (2006), and top-down assimilation that undermines indigenous socio-ecological knowledge.

Comparing Risley and Sarkar on Population Classification

Herbert Risley (1901 Census) classified India’s population into seven distinct racial types (including Indo-Aryan, Dravidian, and Mongolo-Dravidian) using anthropometric techniques, primarily the nasal and cephalic indices. Grounded in 19th-century colonial racial determinism, Risley argued that social status was inversely related to the nasal index. His methodology suffered from selective sampling, arbitrary typologies, and an imperial political agenda designed to portray Indian society as fragmented and naturally hierarchical.

In contrast, S.S. Sarkar (1954) challenged Risley’s racial determinism. While incorporating updated cephalic, somatoscopic, and blood group data, Sarkar emphasized socio-cultural criteria, including linguistic patterns, material culture, and social organization, to demarcate biological and cultural zones.

Methodologically, Sarkar replaced Risley’s static, hierarchical racial taxonomy with an ethno-historical framework accounting for gene flow, migration, and ecological adaptation. Politically, while Risley’s framework legitimized colonial governance through division, Sarkar’s holistic classification supported post-colonial nation-building by emphasizing historical intermixture and biocultural continuity.

Temporal Dimensions of Caste Mobility

Caste mobility is not merely an artifact of post-colonial modernity; it represents an ongoing historical process characterized by pre-modern positional shifts and modern structural realignments.

Indological and historical evidence disproves the notion of an entirely static caste system. Pre-modern mobility operated primarily within the varna framework through Sanskritization, Kshatriyization, and Rajputization. M.N. Srinivas demonstrated that lower jatis emulated the ritual, dietary, and social customs of dominant castes to claim elevated status. Historical records, such as medieval temple inscriptions and copper-plate grants, reveal how ruling lineages and pastoral-tribal groups—such as the Gonds and Bhumijs analysed by Surajit Sinha—were absorbed into the Kshatriya fold. Colonial censuses regularly recorded disputes where jatis organized caste sabhas to petition for higher varna rank.

Empirical studies in post-Independence India illustrate a distinct, accelerated form of mobility driven by democratic decentralization, constitutional reservations (Articles 15 and 16), and market access. André Béteille’s study of Sripuram demonstrated the progressive delinking of caste, class, and power, transforming a harmonic system of cumulative inequalities into a disharmonic one. Ghanshyam Shah highlighted how democratic politics and affirmative action transformed jatis into competitive political interest groups, fostering secular, horizontal mobility rather than traditional ritual emulation.

Pre-modern mobility was positional, slow, and accommodated within traditional hierarchies, whereas modern mobility is structural, legal-political, and actively deconstructs the ritual basis of social stratification.

A nuanced understanding of Indian society demonstrates that PVTG vulnerabilities, classification debates, and caste mobility reflect dynamic adaptations to political, ecological, and economic changes, requiring decentralised and culturally grounded policy responses.

(a) Elucidate the problems faced by Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups and the major challenges in the formulation of special…

Model answer

What "Elucidate" is asking you to do

Structure that answers it

Where marks are lost

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Key points expected

Evaluation rubric

Must cover

Loses marks

Earns more

Extra mark

Must cover

Loses marks

Earns more

Extra mark

Must cover

Loses marks

Earns more

Extra mark

Practice this exact question

More from Anthropology 2023 Paper II