Anthropology 2024 Paper I 50 marks 150 words Compulsory Write short notes

Q5

Write notes on the following in about 150 words each: 10×5=50 (a) Chronometric dating (b) Cultural relevance of the Kula (c) Heritability and its estimation (d) Authority and forms of political organization (e) Single-gene mutation disorders in man

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

निम्नलिखित प्रत्येक पर लगभग 150 शब्दों में टिप्पणी लिखिए : 10×5=50 (a) कालानुक्रमिक आयु-निर्धारण (b) कुला की सांस्कृतिक प्रासंगिकता (c) वंशागतिक और इसका अनुमान (d) राजनीतिक संगठन के प्राधिकार और स्वरूप (e) मनुष्य में एकल-जीन उत्परिवर्तन विकार

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2024 Anthropology questions

Directive word: Write short notes

This question asks you to write short notes. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'write short notes' demands concise, information-dense responses for each sub-part with precise terminology and illustrative examples. Allocate approximately 30 words per sub-part (150 words total), spending roughly 6-7 minutes per note: (a) define chronometric dating and cite C-14/K-Ar methods with Indian sites like Mehrgarh; (b) explain Malinowski's Kula and its sociopolitical functions; (c) define heritability (h²) and mention twin studies; (d) contrast band-tribe-chiefdom-state with authority sources; (e) list autosomal/X-linked disorders with Indian prevalence data. No introduction or conclusion needed; maximize content density.

Key points expected

  • (a) Chronometric dating: Distinguish absolute vs. relative dating; name radiocarbon (C-14), potassium-argon (K-Ar), thermoluminescence; cite Indian applications (Mehrgarh, Hoshangabad, Bhimbetka)
  • (b) Kula exchange: Explain Malinowski's Trobriand ethnography; describe clockwise (soulava) vs. anticlockwise (mwali) circulation; emphasize rank, reciprocity, and political alliance over economic gain
  • (c) Heritability: Define as proportion of phenotypic variance due to genetic variance (h² = VG/VP); explain broad vs. narrow sense; mention twin/adoption studies and limitations (population-specific, not individual)
  • (d) Political organization: Elaborate Service's typology (band-tribe-chiefdom-state); contrast authority types (traditional, charismatic, legal-rational per Weber); cite Indian examples (Naga village republics, caste panchayats)
  • (e) Single-gene disorders: Distinguish autosomal dominant (Huntington's), recessive (sickle cell, thalassemia), X-linked (hemophilia, Duchenne); note high Indian prevalence of β-thalassemia and sickle cell in tribal belts

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%10For (a) correctly distinguishes radiometric from incremental methods with half-life specifics; for (c) accurately defines h² and its 0-1 scale; for (e) correctly identifies inheritance patterns—no conflation of dominance typesBasic definitions present but technical errors in half-life values, heritability interpretation, or inheritance pattern identification; vague on methodological distinctionsFundamental errors such as calling heritability 'heritage,' confusing C-14 with K-Ar dating ranges, or misidentifying sickle cell as dominant; demonstrates conceptual confusion
Theoretical framing20%10For (b) explicitly cites Malinowski's functionalism and Mauss on reciprocity; for (d) references Service's political evolution and Weber's authority types; for (c) mentions Fisher's fundamental theorem or Falconer's quantitative geneticsNames theorists without clear linkage to concepts; mentions Malinowski or Weber in passing without explaining theoretical significance; generic theoretical referencesNo theoretical attribution; presents Kula as mere barter or political organization as commonsense categories without anthropological framework
Ethnographic / Indian examples20%10For (a) cites specific Indian sites (Hoshangabad for TL, Mehrgarh for C-14); for (d) mentions Naga village republics or Khilafat movement; for (e) notes high β-thalassemia prevalence in Gujarati/Kutchi communities and sickle cell in Gond/Bhil tribesGeneric examples (Trobrands for Kula) without Indian specificity; mentions 'tribes' or 'villages' without naming specific groups or regionsNo ethnographic examples; entirely textbook definitions without grounding in empirical cases; incorrect Indian examples (e.g., citing Mohenjodaro for C-14)
Comparative analysis20%10For (a) contrasts C-14 vs. K-Ar applicability by material and time range; for (d) compares band vs. state on leadership, specialization, and inequality; for (c) distinguishes heritability from genetic determination or familialitySimple listing without explicit comparison; mentions multiple methods or types but leaves comparative work implicitIsolated treatment of each item; no comparative dimension even where demanded by the topic (e.g., treats political forms as unrelated categories)
Conclusion & applied angle20%10For (a) notes calibration curves and AMS revolution; for (b) emphasizes Kula's relevance to understanding gift economies and contemporary globalization; for (e) mentions genetic counseling, prenatal diagnosis, and national thalassemia control programsBrief trailing statement without substantive application; generic relevance claims ('important for anthropology')Abrupt ending with no applied dimension; or irrelevant conclusion that does not follow from the notes; missing contemporary relevance entirely

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Anthropology 2024 Paper I