(a) Critically examine existing paradigms of holistic health for the marginalised sections of society drawing inferences from COVID-19 pandemic. 20

(b) Discuss the theories on origin of caste system and its criticism in India. Differentiate between

Question

(a) Critically examine existing paradigms of holistic health for the marginalised sections of society drawing inferences from COVID-19 pandemic. 20

(b) Discuss the theories on origin of caste system and its criticism in India. Differentiate between caste, class and race. 15

(c) Elucidate the resurgence of ethno-nationalism from an anthropological lens. 15

UPSC Answer Check · Accepted Answer

The directive 'critically examine' for part (a) demands balanced evaluation with evidence; parts (b) and (c) require 'discuss' and 'elucidate' respectively. Allocate approximately 40% of word budget to part (a) given its 20 marks, and roughly 30% each to parts (b) and (c). Structure: brief integrated introduction → systematic treatment of each sub-part with clear headings → synthesised conclusion linking health marginalisation, caste stratification, and identity politics.
- Part (a): Critique of biomedical vs. traditional/indigenous health paradigms for marginalised groups; COVID-19 exposed structural vulnerabilities (migrant workers, Adivasis, urban poor); reference to social determinants of health framework and One Health approach
- Part (a): Specific pandemic inferences—reverse migration, vaccine hesitancy, digital divide in health access, role of ASHA workers, community-led responses vs. top-down failures
- Part (b): Theories of caste origin—Risley's racial theory, Nesfield's occupational theory, Ghurye's Indo-Aryan theory, Majumdar's closed-class theory; contemporary criticism from Dumont (hierarchy vs. power), Ambedkar (graded inequality), and Marxist scholars
- Part (b): Systematic differentiation of caste (ascriptive, ritual hierarchy), class (achieved, economic), and race (phenotypical, colonial construction) with Indian illustrations
- Part (c): Anthropological analysis of ethno-nationalism—primordialism (Geertz), instrumentalism (Gellner), constructivism (Anderson); application to India (Kashmir, Northeast, Hindutva) and global parallels
- Part (c): Role of census, language politics, territorial claims, and identity mobilisation in contemporary resurgence

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Concept correctness	20%	10	Precise definitions across all parts: for (a) distinguishes holistic health from biomedical reductionism; for (b) accurately presents each caste theory without conflation; for (c) correctly deploys primordialism, instrumentalism, and constructivism with their respective proponents	Generally accurate definitions but some imprecision—e.g., conflates holistic health with alternative medicine, oversimplifies caste theories, or uses ethno-nationalism and communalism interchangeably	Fundamental conceptual errors—e.g., treats caste as purely religious phenomenon, confuses race and caste entirely, or misidentifies theoretical frameworks in ethno-nationalism
Theoretical framing	20%	10	Robust theoretical scaffolding: for (a) employs critical medical anthropology (Singer, Baer) and structural violence (Farmer); for (b) situates caste theories in their historical-intellectual contexts with critical evaluation; for (c) synthesises Benedict Anderson, Ernest Gellner, and Clifford Geertz with Indian adaptations	Mentions relevant theories but limited critical engagement—lists caste theorists without evaluating their limitations, or describes ethno-nationalism without theoretical depth	Absent or incorrect theoretical references; relies on commonsense explanations without scholarly grounding; misattributes theories to wrong scholars
Ethnographic / Indian examples	20%	10	Rich, specific illustrations: for (a) cites Dharavi model, Adivasi COVID responses in Jharkhand/Chhattisgarh, or migrant worker crisis; for (b) uses empirical studies like Shah-Baviskar's work or Srinivas's fieldwork; for (c) analyses Kashmir conflict, Bodoland demand, or Hindutva mobilisation with ethnographic specificity	Some relevant examples but generic or dated—e.g., mentions 'tribals' without specificity, uses only textbook examples for caste, or cites India without regional variation	Few or no Indian examples; relies on hypothetical illustrations; examples factually incorrect or irrelevant to the specific sub-part
Comparative analysis	20%	10	Systematic comparison as demanded: for (a) contrasts state vs. community health paradigms; for (b) clearly tabulates or narrates caste-class-race distinctions with intersecting dimensions; for (c) compares Indian ethno-nationalism with Yugoslavia, Rwanda, or Scotland movements showing anthropological pattern recognition	Attempts comparison but structure weak—e.g., lists features separately without explicit contrast, or conflates rather than compares categories	No comparative element where required; especially fails on caste-class-race differentiation or treats all cases as unique without pattern identification
Conclusion & applied angle	20%	10	Synthesises across sub-parts—links how caste-based health marginalisation fuels ethno-nationalist identity politics; proposes policy-relevant recommendations (decentralised health governance, caste census, multicultural federalism); demonstrates anthropological contribution to public policy	Separate conclusions for each part without integration; generic recommendations without specificity to Indian context; limited forward-looking perspective	Absent or abrupt conclusion; mere summary without synthesis; no applied or policy dimension; fails to demonstrate relevance of anthropological perspective

Q7

Directive word: Critically examine

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Key points expected

Evaluation rubric

Practice this exact question

More from Anthropology 2024 Paper II