Q6
(a) (i) A 50 cm well in an unconfined aquifer of saturated thickness 45 m yields 600 lpm under a drawdown of 3 m at the pumping well. What will be the discharge under a drawdown of 6 m ? Consider the radius of influence as 500 m. (ii) What will be the discharge in a 30 cm well under a drawdown of 3 m for the unconfined aquifer as mentioned in part (i). (20 marks) (b) How does the peak hour demand affect the design of a water supply scheme ? Sketch the fluctuation in demand for typical Indian conditions. (15 marks) (c) (i) The B.O.D. of a sewage incubated for one day at 25°C has been found to be 100 mg/l. What will be the 5 day, 20°C B.O.D. ? Assume K₂₀ = 0·12 at 20°C. Take temperature coefficient, φ = 1·056. (ii) Despite widespread use of B.O.D., it has some limitations. Mention all those limitations. (15 marks)
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a) (i) 45 m की संतृप्त मोटाई के एक अपरिरुद्ध जलभृत में 50 cm का एक कुआँ, एक पम्पिंग कुएँ में 3 m अपकर्ष (ड्रॉडाउन) पर 600 lpm का उत्सर्जन देता है । 6 m अपकर्ष पर इसका निस्सरण क्या होगा ? प्रभाव त्रिज्या को 500 m मान लीजिए । (ii) भाग (i) में उल्लिखित अपरिरुद्ध जलभृत के लिए 3 m अपकर्ष पर 30 cm के कुएँ का निस्सरण क्या होगा ? (20) (b) चरम घंटा माँग एक जलप्रदाय परियोजना को कैसे प्रभावित करती है ? विशिष्ट भारतीय परिस्थितियों के लिए माँग के उच्चावचन को आरेखित कीजिए । (15) (c) (i) 25°C पर एक दिन के लिए उद्भवन किए गए एक अपशिष्ट का बी.ओ.डी. 100 mg/l पाया गया । अपशिष्ट के 20°C पर पाँच दिन के बी.ओ.डी. का मान क्या होगा ? 20°C पर K₂₀ = 0·12 मान लीजिए । तापमान गुणांक, φ = 1·056 लीजिए । (ii) बी.ओ.डी. के व्यापक उपयोग के बावजूद इसकी कुछ सीमाएँ हैं । इन सभी सीमाओं का उल्लेख कीजिए । (15)
Directive word: Solve
This question asks you to solve. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.
See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
Solve the numerical problems in parts (a) and (c) using appropriate groundwater and BOD formulae, while explaining and sketching for part (b). Allocate approximately 40% time to part (a) given its 20 marks, 30% to part (b) for the demand curve sketch and explanation, and 30% to part (c) for temperature correction calculations and limitations discussion. Present derivations clearly with stated assumptions before substituting values.
Key points expected
- Part (a)(i): Apply Dupuit-Thiem equation for unconfined aquifer to find discharge at 6m drawdown, recognizing that transmissibility remains constant and discharge is proportional to (2H-s)s
- Part (a)(ii): Calculate discharge for 30cm well using same aquifer properties, applying well radius scaling in the logarithmic term of Dupuit equation
- Part (b): Explain peak hour factor (typically 1.5-2.5 for Indian cities) and its impact on distribution main sizing, service reservoir capacity, and pumping station design
- Part (b): Sketch typical Indian diurnal demand curve showing morning and evening peaks, with minimum night flow and seasonal variation for summer/winter
- Part (c)(i): Apply temperature correction formula K_T = K_20 × φ^(T-20) to find K_25, then use BOD_t = L_0(1-e^(-Kt)) relationship to find ultimate BOD and 5-day 20°C BOD
- Part (c)(ii): Enumerate BOD limitations: 5-day delay in results, inhibition by toxic substances, nitrification interference, dilution requirements, and non-representative of actual stream conditions
Evaluation rubric
| Dimension | Weight | Max marks | Excellent | Average | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concept correctness | 20% | 10 | Correctly identifies Dupuit-Thiem equation for unconfined aquifer in (a), recognizes proportionality Q ∝ (2H-s)s for same well; explains peak hour factor impact on infrastructure sizing in (b); applies correct temperature correction and first-order BOD kinetics in (c) | Uses correct general equations but makes minor errors in identifying aquifer type or temperature correction direction; basic explanation of peak demand without specific Indian context | Confuses confined/unconfined aquifer equations, omits temperature correction entirely, or misunderstands BOD as linear rather than first-order reaction |
| Numerical accuracy | 25% | 12.5 | Accurate calculations: (a)(i) Q_6 ≈ 1150-1200 lpm using exact Dupuit; (a)(ii) Q_30cm ≈ 580-620 lpm; (c)(i) correct K_25 = 0.158, L_0 ≈ 730 mg/l, BOD_5,20 ≈ 325-335 mg/l with proper unit handling | Correct method but arithmetic errors or unit conversion mistakes (e.g., cm/m, lpm to m³/s); approximate values within 10-15% of correct answer | Major calculation errors, wrong formula substitution, or order-of-magnitude mistakes; missing critical steps leading to nonsensical results |
| Diagram quality | 15% | 7.5 | Clear hand-drawn sketch for (b) showing: x-axis (24 hours), y-axis (flow as % of average), two distinct peaks (morning 6-9 AM, evening 6-9 PM), minimum night flow (~20-30%), labeled Indian conditions; may include cone of depression for (a) | Basic curve showing general trend but missing peak timings, unlabeled axes, or poor proportion between peaks and average flow | No diagram for (b), or completely incorrect sketch showing random fluctuations without typical diurnal pattern; missing labels and scale |
| Step-by-step derivation | 25% | 12.5 | Explicit statement of all formulae (Dupuit-Thiem, temperature correction, BOD rate equation), clear substitution of values with units, logical flow from given data to final answer; shows intermediate steps for K_25 and L_0 before final BOD | Some formulae stated but skips intermediate steps; jumps from given data to answer without showing working; minor gaps in logical progression | No derivations shown, only final answers stated; or incorrect formulae used throughout with no explanation of method |
| Practical interpretation | 15% | 7.5 | Interprets (a) results for well design efficiency and specific capacity; relates (b) peak factor to Indian urban water supply challenges (e.g., Bangalore, Delhi intermittent supply); connects (c) BOD limitations to need for COD/TOC alternatives in pollution control | Brief mention of practical relevance without specific examples; generic statements about water demand or pollution without Indian context | Purely mathematical treatment with no physical interpretation; fails to explain what results mean for engineering design or environmental management |
Practice this exact question
Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.
Evaluate my answer →More from Civil Engineering 2023 Paper II
- Q1 (a) What are the approximate limits of chemical (oxide) composition in hydraulic cement ? Also state the function of oxides in brief. (10 m…
- Q2 (a) For a project consisting of several activities, the allotted time and the dependencies of the activities are presented below: | Activit…
- Q3 (a) (i) Explain any two traffic surveys carried out to decide the geometric design features of a road. (5 marks) (ii) The relationship betw…
- Q4 (a) A machine was purchased for ₹4,50,000 on 1st January 2001 and erection and installation work costed ₹80,000. The same machine is replac…
- Q5 (a) A 6-hour unit hydrograph has the following ordinates : If φ index is 0·3 cm/hr and base flow is 25 m³/s, determine the ordinates of res…
- Q6 (a) (i) A 50 cm well in an unconfined aquifer of saturated thickness 45 m yields 600 lpm under a drawdown of 3 m at the pumping well. What…
- Q7 (a) Discuss the following operational difficulties encountered in the operation of Activated Sludge process : (i) Rising Sludge or Floating…
- Q8 (a) (i) Design a trapezoidal concrete lined channel to carry a discharge of 300 m³/s at a slope of 1 in 4000. The side slope of the channel…