(a) The following details have been extracted from the cost records of a company :

Material : 5 lbs @ ₹ 5 – ₹ 25
Labour : 4 Hrs @ ₹ 3 – ₹ 12

The production schedule for the month of January, 2022 required the completion of 7000 units; however 8100

Question

(a) The following details have been extracted from the cost records of a company :

Material : 5 lbs @ ₹ 5 – ₹ 25
Labour : 4 Hrs @ ₹ 3 – ₹ 12

The production schedule for the month of January, 2022 required the completion of 7000 units; however 8100 units were actually produced during the month. Purchase of materials of 40000 lbs was made at a total invoice price of ₹ 1,65,000.

Production record for the month of January, 2022 revealed the following :

Materials requisitioned and used – 35800 lbs, Direct labour – 17200 Hrs – ₹ 59,400.

Calculate the appropriate material and labour variances. (20 marks)

(b) Discuss the impact of behavioural sciences on Accounting. (15 marks)

(c) Discuss the major points to be considered by an auditor while conducting the audit of charitable institutions. (15 marks)

UPSC Answer Check · Accepted Answer

Begin with precise numerical working for part (a) calculating all material variances (MPV, MUV/MQV, MYV) and labour variances (LRV, LEV/LUV, LYV/LITV) using standard costing formulas; allocate ~40% time here. For part (b), discuss behavioural dimensions like budgetary participation, goal congruence, and management control systems with theories of Argyris, Hofstede, and Ouchi (~30%). For part (c), enumerate audit considerations specific to charitable institutions including fund utilization, FCRA compliance, donor restrictions, and Section 12A/80G verification (~30%). Conclude with integrated insights on how behavioural factors affect cost control in non-profits.
- Part (a): Correct calculation of Material Price Variance (MPV) = (SP-AP)×AQ purchased = (5-4.125)×40000 = ₹35,000(F); Material Usage/Quantity Variance (MUV/MQV) = (SQ-AQ used)×SP = (40500-35800)×5 = ₹23,500(F); Material Yield Variance if calculated; Labour Rate Variance (LRV) = (SR-AR)×AH = (3-3.4535)×17200 = ₹7,800(A); Labour Efficiency Variance (LEV) = (SH-AH)×SR = (32400-17200)×3 = ₹45,600(F); Labour Yield/Idle Time Variance
- Part (a): Proper identification of standard quantities: SQ for actual output = 8100×5 = 40,500 lbs material; SH = 8100×4 = 32,400 hours; correct AP = ₹1,65,000/40,000 = ₹4.125/lb; AR = ₹59,400/17,200 = ₹3.4535/hr
- Part (b): Discussion of behavioural science impact: participative budgeting (Argyris' concern with budget pressure), budgetary slack creation, goal congruence vs. sub-optimisation, Hofstede's cultural dimensions in control systems, Ouchi's Theory Z and clan control, human information processing limitations in accounting decisions
- Part (b): Impact on management accounting practices: beyond economic rationality to psychological/sociological factors; motivational aspects of performance measurement; dysfunctional consequences of rigid variance analysis (e.g., labour efficiency pressure causing quality sacrifice)
- Part (c): Audit of charitable institutions: verification of registration under Section 12A/12AA and 80G of Income Tax Act; FCRA registration and utilization certificates; compliance with CSR provisions (Section 135) if applicable; examination of donor-imposed restrictions and fund earmarking
- Part (c): Specific audit procedures: verification of application of funds (85% rule for religious/charitable trusts); checking accumulation beyond 5 years; related party transactions with trustees; physical verification of assets; examination of foreign contribution receipts and Form FC-6 filings; reporting in Form 10B
- Integration: Recognition that charitable institutions require behavioural considerations in cost control (volunteer labour motivation, donor transparency expectations) alongside strict compliance audit framework

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	20%	10	For (a), correctly interprets 'calculate' to require all material and labour variances with proper formulas and reconciliation; for (b), understands 'discuss' demands evaluative treatment of behavioural theories and their accounting applications; for (c), grasps that 'discuss' requires both procedural audit steps and regulatory framework for charitable institutions	Calculates basic variances for (a) but misses yield variances or reconciliation; for (b) and (c) provides descriptive lists without evaluative depth or misses regulatory specifics	Misinterprets directives: treats (a) as requiring only price variances, (b) as pure definition of behavioural science, or (c) as general commercial audit without charity-specific considerations
Content depth & accuracy	20%	10	Numerical accuracy in (a) with correct variance calculations and clear working; for (b) cites specific theorists (Argyris, Hofstede, Ouchi, Hopwood) and their contributions; for (c) accurately references Section 12A, 80G, FCRA 2010, and Form 10B requirements with correct statutory provisions	Minor calculation errors in (a) or incomplete variance set; for (b) mentions behavioural concepts without theorist attribution; for (c) covers general audit steps but misses specific charity law provisions or cites incorrect sections	Fundamental calculation errors in (a) (wrong SP/AP identification, formula confusion); for (b) conflates behavioural science with HR management; for (c) provides company audit procedures without charity-specific modifications
Structure & flow	20%	10	Clear three-part structure with (a) showing systematic variance computation table, (b) progressing from individual behaviour to organizational systems, (c) moving from legal framework to operational verification; effective signposting and logical transitions between theoretical and practical dimensions	Addresses all parts but with uneven organization; (a) may lack clear variance summary, (b) and (c) present as bullet points without thematic progression; some repetition between points	Disorganized presentation with calculations scattered, no clear part separation, or illogical sequencing (e.g., jumping between parts without completion); missing headings or part identifiers
Examples / case-law / data	20%	10	For (a), uses data precisely: ₹1,65,000/40,000 lbs, 81,00 units actual output; for (b) references Hopwood's styles of budget use or Indian PSU experiences with participative budgeting; for (c) cites specific forms (10B, FC-6), recent FCRA amendments, or examples like Tata Trusts audit practices or PM CARES audit controversies	Uses given data in (a) but without interpretation; for (b) and (c) provides generic examples without specificity or misses Indian regulatory context entirely	Fails to use provided numerical data in (a); for (b) and (c) no examples, or irrelevant international cases without Indian applicability; misstates regulatory requirements
Conclusion & analytical edge	20%	10	Synthesizes across parts: notes how behavioural insights explain variance analysis limitations in (a), and how charitable audit requires balancing accountability (donor/stakeholder) with operational flexibility; critically evaluates whether traditional variance analysis suits non-profit contexts; forward-looking observation on integrated reporting for charities	Brief part-wise conclusions without cross-integration; restates main points without critical evaluation; no recognition of tensions between behavioural goals and control systems	Missing conclusion or purely summarizing; no analytical linkage between cost accounting, behavioural science, and charity audit; ends abruptly without synthesis

(a) The following details have been extracted from the cost records of a company : Material : 5 lbs @ ₹ 5 – ₹ 25 Labour : 4 Hrs…

Directive word: Calculate

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Key points expected

Evaluation rubric

Practice this exact question

More from Commerce & Accountancy 2022 Paper I