(a) During the month of May 2024, total 2000 units were introduced into Process-I. The normal loss was estimated at 5% on input. At the end of the month, 1400 units had been produced and transferred to the next process, 460 units were incomplete and

Question

(a) During the month of May 2024, total 2000 units were introduced into Process-I. The normal loss was estimated at 5% on input. At the end of the month, 1400 units had been produced and transferred to the next process, 460 units were incomplete and 140 units had been scrapped. It was estimated that incomplete units had reached a stage in production as follows: Material 75% completed, Labour 50% completed, Overheads 50% completed. The cost of 2000 units introduced was ₹ 5,800. Direct material introduced during the process amounted to ₹ 1,440. Production Overheads incurred were ₹ 1,670 and Direct Labour was ₹ 3,340. Each unit scrapped was realized at ₹ 1 each unit. The units scrapped have passed through the process, so were 100% completed as regards material, labour and overheads. You are requested to prepare the following statements: (i) Statement of Equivalent Production; (ii) Statement of Cost and Evaluation; (iii) Process-I Account; and (iv) Abnormal Loss Account. (20 marks)

(b) "Cost Accounting is a system of foresight and not a post-mortem, it turns losses into profits, speeds up activities and eliminates waste." Explain the statement along with your viewpoints. (15 marks)

(c) What are the key differences between Special Audit and Accounts Investigation? Give your viewpoint along with examples. (15 marks)

UPSC Answer Check · Accepted Answer

Begin with the numerical problem (a) carrying 40% marks: prepare equivalent production, cost evaluation, Process-I Account and Abnormal Loss Account with precise calculations. For (b), explain the forward-looking nature of cost accounting with viewpoints on planning, control and decision-making. For (c), differentiate Special Audit from Accounts Investigation with Indian examples like CAG special audits or SEBI investigations. Allocate approximately 40% time to (a), 30% each to (b) and (c).
- Part (a): Correct computation of equivalent units for materials (2,045), labour (1,630) and overheads (1,630); proper treatment of normal loss (100 units) and abnormal loss (40 units); accurate cost per equivalent unit and valuation of finished goods, WIP and abnormal loss
- Part (a): Preparation of four required statements—Equivalent Production, Cost and Evaluation, Process-I Account, and Abnormal Loss Account—with correct journal entries and transfers
- Part (b): Explanation of cost accounting as 'foresight' through budgeting, standard costing and variance analysis; contrast with 'post-mortem' financial accounting; viewpoints on how it converts losses to profits via cost control and waste elimination
- Part (c): Clear distinction between Special Audit (statutory, specific purpose, formal report) and Accounts Investigation (suspicion-based, broader scope, confidential); examples like CAG's performance audit, RBI special audit of banks, or SFIO investigations under Companies Act
- Part (c): Viewpoint on when each is appropriate and their complementary roles in corporate governance and fraud detection

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	15%	7.5	Correctly identifies 'solve' for (a) requiring precise numerical working, 'explain' for (b) needing conceptual exposition with viewpoints, and 'differentiate with examples' for (c); maintains appropriate tone and depth for each sub-part without conflating directives	Attempts all parts but treats (b) or (c) too descriptively without required viewpoints/examples, or rushes calculations in (a)	Misreads directives—e.g., describes without solving (a), or merely lists differences without examples in (c)
Content depth & accuracy	30%	15	Part (a): All calculations accurate—equivalent units, cost per unit (₹3.00 material, ₹2.00 labour, ₹1.00 overhead), valuations correct; Part (b): Covers planning, controlling, decision-making functions with balanced critique; Part (c): Distinguishes statutory basis, scope, methodology and reporting of both	Minor calculation errors in (a) or incomplete equivalent units; (b) and (c) cover basics but lack depth in viewpoints or contemporary relevance	Fundamental errors—wrong normal/abnormal loss split, incorrect equivalent units, confused concepts in (b) and (c), or entirely omitted sub-part
Structure & flow	20%	10	Clear segregation into (a), (b), (c) with visible headings; (a) shows sequential working from equivalent production → cost statement → ledger accounts; (b) and (c) have logical progression from definition to analysis to viewpoint	All parts attempted but poor sequencing—e.g., ledger accounts before cost statements, or mixed paragraphs without sub-headings	Disorganized working with no clear part demarcation; calculations scattered, making verification impossible
Examples / case-law / data	20%	10	Uses specific Indian examples: CAG's performance/efficiency audits, RBI special audits under Banking Regulation Act, SEBI forensic audits, SFIO investigations (Satyam, PNB scam); cites ICAI guidance on cost accounting standards for (b)	Generic examples or only one Indian instance; (a) has correct data but no contextual mention of cost accounting standards	No examples in (c), or irrelevant foreign cases; (a) lacks working notes or source data attribution
Conclusion & analytical edge	15%	7.5	Synthesizes that process costing illustrates cost accounting's 'foresight' principle; concludes on integration of special audit and investigation in India's regulatory framework; offers critical view on limitations (cost accounting not panacea, investigations need safeguards)	Brief summative statements without integration across parts or critical reflection	No conclusion, or abrupt ending; purely descriptive without analytical viewpoint as demanded

(a) During the month of May 2024, total 2000 units were introduced into Process-I. The normal loss was estimated at 5% on input…

Directive word: Solve

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Key points expected

Evaluation rubric

Practice this exact question

More from Commerce & Accountancy 2024 Paper I