Electrical Engineering 2022 Paper II 50 marks Calculate

Q8

(a) A signal is given by x[t] = cos(28πt) + 2cos(40πt) + 3cos(70πt) This signal is sampled at 90 samples/s to get discrete-time signal x(n). (i) Find the periodicity of the individual components in the signal and hence find the periodicity N₀ of the signal x(n). (ii) Find the harmonic indices m (0 ≤ m < N₀) of the complex DTFS coefficient Dₘ, where Dₘ is non-zero. (iii) By inspection, write the magnitude of the coefficients |Dₘ| for the indices found above. 20 marks (b) For a unity feedback time delay system with open-loop transfer function G(s) = Ke⁻ᵀˢ/s(s+2) calculate— (i) the maximum tolerable value of delay T, when K = 1; (ii) phase margin when K = √5 and delay T = 0·5 second. 20 marks (c) Given a system in state space representation as [ẋ₁] [0 1][x₁] [0] [ẋ₂] = [0 -3][x₂] + [1] u y = [1 0][x₁] [x₂] (i) Check whether the system is observable or not. (ii) Find the state transition matrix. (iii) Design a state feedback controller to place closed-loop poles at −1±2j. 20 marks

Directive word: Calculate

This question asks you to calculate. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Calculate all numerical results with systematic derivations, allocating approximately 35% time to part (a) on DTFS periodicity and harmonic analysis, 30% to part (b) on time-delay stability using Nyquist/Bode criteria, and 35% to part (c) on state-space design including observability test, matrix exponential computation, and pole placement via Ackermann's formula or direct method. Present each sub-part with clear headings, show all intermediate steps, and conclude with boxed final answers.

Key points expected

  • For (a)(i): Compute digital frequencies ω₁=28π/90, ω₂=40π/90, ω₃=70π/90; find periods N₁=45, N₂=9, N₃=9; determine fundamental period N₀=LCM(45,9,9)=45
  • For (a)(ii): Identify harmonic indices m₁=14, m₂=20, m₃=35 (or equivalently m₃=-10 mod 45 = 35) where Dₘ is non-zero within 0≤m<45
  • For (a)(iii): State |D₁₄|=0.5, |D₂₀|=1, |D₃₅|=1.5 with correct conjugate symmetry |D₄₅₋ₘ|=|Dₘ|
  • For (b)(i): Apply Nyquist stability criterion; find phase crossover frequency ωₚc=√2 rad/s; compute maximum delay Tₘₐₓ=π/(2√2)≈1.11s for K=1
  • For (b)(ii): At K=√5, find gain crossover frequency ωgc=1 rad/s; calculate phase margin without delay as 90°-arctan(0.5)=63.43°; subtract delay phase ωgc×T×180/π=28.65° to get PM≈34.8°
  • For (c)(i)-(iii): Check observability rank[O]=rank[C;CA]=2 (observable); compute state transition matrix Φ(t)=[1 (1-e⁻³ᵗ)/3; 0 e⁻³ᵗ]; design state feedback K=[5 3] using desired characteristic equation s²+2s+5=0

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%12Correctly applies Nyquist sampling theorem for (a), recognizes time-delay as non-minimum phase element for (b), and properly uses observability rank test, matrix exponential properties, and pole placement theory for (c); no conceptual confusion between continuous and discrete domainsMinor errors in identifying harmonic folding or aliasing in (a); applies Bode plot approximately for (b) with some phase margin errors; attempts observability test but with matrix dimension errors in (c)Fundamental misunderstanding of periodicity in sampled signals, treats e⁻ᵀˢ as simple gain, or confuses controllability with observability; fails to recognize state feedback requires controllability check
Numerical accuracy20%12All numerical values precise: N₀=45, correct harmonic indices, Tₘₐₓ=1.1107s, PM≈34.8° or 35°, state feedback gains K₁=5, K₂=3; uses exact fractions where appropriate (π/2√2)Correct order of magnitude but rounding errors in final values; e.g., N₀=45 correct but harmonic indices off by 1 due to floor/ceiling confusion; PM within ±5° of correct valueMajor calculation errors: wrong LCM for periodicity, incorrect phase crossover frequency, or state feedback gains that don't produce desired poles; arithmetic mistakes in matrix operations
Diagram quality15%9Clear unit circle diagram showing digital frequencies and harmonic locations for (a); labeled Bode magnitude/phase sketches showing gain/phase crossover for (b); signal flow graph or block diagram for state feedback implementation in (c)Rough sketches without proper labels or scales; missing key features like -180° line on phase plot or conjugate symmetry indication on DTFS diagramNo diagrams where clearly needed, or completely incorrect diagrams (e.g., s-plane pole-zero plot instead of z-plane for discrete signal, wrong Nyquist contour)
Step-by-step derivation25%15Explicit derivation: digital frequency conversion ω=ΩTₛ, period calculation via 2π/ω=N/M reduction, complete Nyquist criterion application with phase condition -180°-ωT×180/π, full observability matrix construction, Laplace transform inversion for Φ(t), and direct comparison method or Ackermann's formula for KSkips key steps like explicit LCM calculation or assumes Φ(t) without derivation; uses shortcuts without justification; attempts pole placement but with algebraic errors in characteristic equation matchingJumps to final answers without derivation; no intermediate steps shown; incorrect formula application (e.g., wrong state transition matrix formula, confused stability criteria)
Practical interpretation20%12Interprets N₀=45 as 0.5s period in continuous time; explains Tₘₐₓ as stability limit for Indian telecom/networked control systems; discusses state feedback as modern control alternative to PID for MIMO systems like power plant turbine-governor controlBrief mention of practical relevance without specific context; generic statements about stability importance without linking to time-delay systemsNo physical interpretation; purely mathematical answer without connecting to engineering applications like signal reconstruction, process control with transport lag, or state estimation in power systems

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Electrical Engineering 2022 Paper II