General Studies 2021 GS Paper II 10 marks 150 words Compulsory Explain

Q5

"Pressure groups play a vital role in influencing public policy making in India." Explain how the business associations contribute to public policies. (Answer in 150 words) 10

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

"भारत में सार्वजनिक नीति बनाने में दबाव समूह महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका निभाते हैं।" समझाइए कि व्यवसाय संघ, सार्वजनिक नीतियों में किस प्रकार योगदान करते हैं। (उत्तर 150 शब्दों में दीजिए)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2021 General Studies questions

Directive word: Explain

This question asks you to explain. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'explain' requires demonstrating causal mechanisms and processes through which business associations shape policy. Structure: brief introduction defining business associations as pressure groups → body explaining specific contribution mechanisms (lobbying, consultation, funding, research) → conclusion noting balanced/critical perspective on their democratic role.

Key points expected

Mechanisms of influence: pre-budget consultations, representation in parliamentary committees, lobbying through CII/FICCI/ASSOCHAM
Policy formulation stage: providing sectoral data, impact assessments, and technical inputs to ministries
Post-policy influence: judicial interventions, PILs, and regulatory feedback during rule-making
Specific examples: GST Council representations, labour law reforms, environmental clearances lobbying
Balanced view: mention concerns about regulatory capture, unequal access compared to small enterprises

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	20%	2	Clearly distinguishes 'explain' from mere description; demonstrates how business associations causally influence policy through multiple stages of policy cycle, not just lists activities	Partially addresses the 'how' of contribution but mixes description with explanation; some confusion between pressure groups and political parties	Misinterprets directive as 'describe' or 'list'; provides only definitions without explaining contribution mechanisms
Content depth & accuracy	20%	2	Covers institutional, procedural, and informal channels accurately; distinguishes between peak bodies (CII/FICCI) and sectoral associations; mentions both Union and state-level influence	Identifies 2-3 mechanisms correctly but conflates business associations with trade unions or lacks specificity on policy stages	Factual errors (confusing business associations with NGOs); vague generalizations like 'they influence government'; irrelevant content on political parties
Structure & flow	20%	2	Logical progression from definition → mechanisms → examples → critical conclusion; smooth transitions between policy formulation, enactment, and implementation stages	Basic intro-body-conclusion structure but uneven weightage; some repetition or abrupt shifts between points; word limit slightly exceeded or underutilized	Disorganized or bullet-heavy without integration; missing introduction or conclusion; structural incoherence that impedes understanding
Examples / case-law / data	20%	2	Specific contemporary examples: CII/FICCI pre-budget memoranda, GST representations, RCEP stance, labour code consultations, or specific sectoral cases (telecom, pharma)	Generic mention of 'CII/FICCI' without specific policy context; dated examples (pre-2014) or hypothetical illustrations	No examples or incorrect ones (mentioning RSS, trade unions as business associations); purely theoretical answer
Conclusion & analytical edge	20%	2	Balanced critical insight: notes democratic deficit (corporate capture), asymmetry between big business and MSMEs, or need for transparency in lobbying; forward-looking suggestion	Neutral summary restating points; or one-sided praise/criticism without nuance; no broader implication for democracy or governance	Missing conclusion; abrupt ending; or irrelevant ideological statement unrelated to business associations' policy role

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →