General Studies 2023 GS Paper II 15 marks 250 words Compulsory Account for

GS Paper II — Q13

Account for the legal and political factors responsible for the reduced frequency of using Article 356 by the Union Governments…

Account for the legal and political factors responsible for the reduced frequency of using Article 356 by the Union Governments since mid 1990s. (Answer in 250 words) 15 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

संघीय सरकारों द्वारा 1990 के दशक के मध्य से अनुच्छेद 356 के उपयोग की कम आवृत्ति के लिये जिम्मेदार विधिक एवं राजनीतिक कारकों का विवरण प्रस्तुत कीजिए। (250 शब्दों में उत्तर) 15 marks

Q13 of the 2023 UPSC Mains General Studies GS Paper II, as printed
The question as printed in the 2023 General Studies paper

Model answer

Written by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the 250-word length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key.

Article 356, a device for imposing President’s Rule, was used often before the 1990s to dismiss state governments on partisan grounds. Its reduced use by Union Governments since the mid-1990s is due to legal and political changes.

Legally, the S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) judgment laid down strict guidelines for Article 356 invocation and made it subject to judicial review. It required the President to be satisfied, on objective material, that the state government could not be carried on in accordance with the Constitution, and treated the Sarkaria Commission’s 1988 recommendations on federalism and procedural safeguards as persuasive guidelines, not binding law. It also required that the state government be given an opportunity to show cause, and held that the Governor’s report alone was not conclusive. The Court also held that an unconstitutional order could be invalidated, though a dissolved assembly generally could not be revived. Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India (2006) further restricted arbitrary use, emphasising that the President’s satisfaction must rest on objective material and that dismissal without constitutional grounds was impermissible.

Politically, the shift to coalition governments from 1996 to 2014 made unilateral dismissal politically costly. The rise of regional parties and hung assemblies reduced the Union’s dominance over states, while federal front politics meant that dismissing a state government could destabilise the centre’s own parliamentary support. The Supreme Court’s activism in policing constitutional boundaries reinforced this restraint.

Thus, the decline reflects a shift from majoritarian centralism to a more judicially checked, coalition-sensitive federalism.

What "Account for" is asking you to do

Explain why the stated fact or outcome came about. The fact is given and needs no describing — the whole answer is causes, usually of more than one kind, with a view on which of them mattered most.

Structure that answers it

State the outcome precisely → causes of the first kind, legal or structural → causes of the second kind, political or social → their relative weight → why rival explanations fall short

Where marks are lost

Describing the phenomenon at length and never reaching its cause, or offering one line of causation when the stem names two kinds of factor.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Framework: Principle > Institution or Article > Problem with example > Realistic reform. account for: state the phenomenon > the causes in order of weight > conclusion Full marks: Identifies Bommai judgment and coalition politics as key drivers with clear structure.

Key points expected

  • Cite S.R. Bommai judgment as the primary legal factor
  • Explain the shift from one-party dominance to coalition politics
  • Mention the role of the Supreme Court in checking misuse
  • Conclude with the impact on federalism or governance

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. The answer State the phenomenon of reduced Art 356 usage and list legal/political causes in order of weight. 15 marks · 250 words

    account for— state the phenomenon → the causes in order of weight → conclusion

    Must cover

    • Cite S.R. Bommai judgment as the primary legal factor
    • Explain the shift from one-party dominance to coalition politics
    • Mention the role of the Supreme Court in checking misuse
    • Conclude with the impact on federalism or governance

    Loses marks

    • Reciting Article 356 text without analysis
    • Focusing only on legal factors, ignoring political
    • Ending without a conclusion or reform

    Earns more

    • Reference the 1989-90s period of frequent misuse
    • Mention the 14th Finance Commission or 2nd ARC
    • Discuss the role of the Election Commission
    • Reference the 73rd/74th Amendments' impact on state power

    Extra mark

    • Cite specific data on Art 356 usage
    • Mention the President's Rule in specific states

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from General Studies 2023 GS Paper II