Critically analyse India's evolving diplomatic, economic and strategic relations with the Central Asian Republics (CARs)…

Critically analyse India's evolving diplomatic, economic and strategic relations with the Central Asian Republics (CARs) highlighting their increasing significance in regional and global geopolitics. (Answer in 150 words) 10 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

मध्य एशियाई गणराज्यों (C.A.R.s) के साथ भारत के विकसित होते राजनीतिक, आर्थिक और रणनीतिक संबंधों का आलोचनात्मक विश्लेषण कीजिये, तथा क्षेत्रीय और वैश्विक भूराजनीति में उनके बढ़ते महत्व पर प्रकाश डालिये। (उत्तर 150 शब्दों में लिखिए)

The question as printed in the 2024 General Studies paper

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2024 General Studies questions

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the 150-word length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

India’s engagement with the Central Asian Republics (CARs) has evolved from the 2012 ‘Connect Central Asia’ policy to institutionalised mechanisms like the India-Central Asia Dialogue and full SCO membership (2017). Strategically, CARs are vital for regional counter-terrorism, stabilizing post-Taliban Afghanistan, and hedging against the China-Pakistan axis through joint military exercises (e.g., KAZIND, DUSTLIK).

Economically, however, relations remain severely under-realised, with bilateral trade stagnant at ~$2 billion. While critical uranium supplies from Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan support India’s civil nuclear sector, projects like the TAPI pipeline remain stalled. India’s footprint faces structural constraints: absence of direct overland access, overwhelming Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) dominance, and Russia’s residual security influence.

Crucially, the Ukraine war and CARs’ pursuit of a ‘multi-vector’ foreign policy create strategic space for India. By operationalizing Chabahar Port (under the 10-year IPGL contract signed in 2024, though exposed to US sanctions risk), fast-tracking the INSTC, and deploying soft power in IT, education, and healthcare, India can effectively anchor its Eurasian outreach without direct great-power friction. Addressing physical connectivity deficits remains imperative to translate diplomatic goodwill into tangible strategic influence.

How this answer will be evaluated

Framework: GS2 International Relations

What earns full marks: Critical analysis with specific examples of diplomatic, economic, and strategic linkages.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

The answer Critically analyse India's evolving diplomatic, economic and strategic ties with the Central Asian Republics and their growing geopolitical significance. 10 marks · 150 words

analyse— intro → causes → effects → stakeholders/linkages → way forward
Must cover
- Diplomatic evolution: Connect Central Asia (2012), PM's 2015 visits to all five, India–Central Asia Dialogue, first India–Central Asia Summit (January 2022), SCO membership (2017)
- Strategic: Afghanistan stability, counter-terrorism, defence exercises (KAZIND, Dustlik, Khanjar), Ayni airbase history, energy and uranium (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan)
- Economic: trade only about $2 billion; connectivity through Chabahar (10-year IPGL contract, 2024) and INSTC, Ashgabat Agreement; TAPI stalled
- Geopolitical significance and constraints: great-power competition (China's BRI, Russia's security role, Turkey), critical minerals, Pakistan-Afghanistan barrier, US sanctions risk on Chabahar; way forward
Loses marks
- Listing ties without critical analysis
- Factual errors on connectivity routes
Earns more
- Development partnership: $1 billion line of credit, High Impact Community Development Projects
- Soft power: education, ITEC, films, yoga
Extra mark
- Role of CARs' multi-vector foreign policy

What "Critically analyse" is asking you to do

Break the subject into its working parts and show how they act on each other. The marks are in the interconnections — which factor drives which, and what the resulting structure explains — not in the inventory of factors. “Critically” is not a section added at the end: name the yardstick you are judging by — the evidence, the stated objective, a constitutional principle, a rival explanation — and let a verdict close each part of the body. Where the question quotes a claim, that verdict must land on the claim itself, accepted, qualified or rejected, and not on the theme in general.

Structure that answers it

Define the whole → separate it into its parts → show which part drives which → what that interaction produces → what the structure implies

Where marks are lost

Merits in one paragraph, demerits in the next, and a conclusion calling for a balanced and holistic approach. That is a survey with the judgement left out and it holds the answer in the middle band. The opposite error is reading “critically” as permission to attack — and with the odd pairings, critically describe or critically explain, the exposition still carries most of the marks, the judgement being a layer on it rather than a substitute for it.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

Model answer

How this answer will be evaluated

Evaluation rubric

Must cover

Loses marks

Earns more

Extra mark

Structure that answers it

Where marks are lost

Practice this exact question

More from General Studies 2024 GS Paper II