General Studies 2024 GS Paper II 10 marks 150 words Compulsory Critically analyse

Q10

Critically analyse India's evolving diplomatic, economic and strategic relations with the Central Asian Republics (CARs) highlighting their increasing significance in regional and global geopolitics. (Answer in 150 words) 10

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

मध्य एशियाई गणराज्यों (C.A.R.s) के साथ भारत के विकसित होते राजनीतिक, आर्थिक और रणनीतिक संबंधों का आलोचनात्मक विश्लेषण कीजिये, तथा क्षेत्रीय और वैश्विक भूराजनीति में उनके बढ़ते महत्व पर प्रकाश डालिये। (उत्तर 150 शब्दों में लिखिए)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2024 General Studies questions

Directive word: Critically analyse

This question asks you to critically analyse. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'critically analyse' requires examining India's CAR relations with balanced judgment—identifying strengths, limitations, and evolving significance. Structure: brief context on post-Soviet engagement → three-dimensional analysis (diplomatic, economic, strategic) with critical assessment → conclusion on future trajectory and India's positioning amid great power competition.

Key points expected

Diplomatic evolution: from 'Connect Central Asia' policy (2012) to SCO membership (2017) and bilateral institutional mechanisms like India-Central Asia Dialogue
Economic dimensions: Chabahar port as connectivity gateway, limited trade volumes (~$2 billion) vs potential, energy cooperation (TAPI pipeline, uranium from Uzbekistan/Kazakhstan)
Strategic significance: countering Pakistan-China axis, Afghanistan stability concerns, defence cooperation (military training, counter-terrorism)
Critical gaps: absence of direct land connectivity, China's BRI dominance, Russia's residual influence, limited Indian investment compared to China
Geopolitical repositioning: CARs' 'multi-vector' foreign policy, Ukraine war impact on Russia-Central Asia ties creating space for India
India's strategic calculus: balancing Eurasian engagement without provoking China, leveraging soft power (IT, education, cultural links)

Evaluation rubric

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	20%	2	Demonstrates nuanced grasp of 'critically analyse' by presenting both achievements (SCO membership, Chabahar) and systemic constraints (geographic isolation, Chinese dominance) with evaluative judgment rather than descriptive listing	Covers diplomatic, economic, strategic aspects descriptively but lacks critical balance or treats all dimensions as equally successful without acknowledging limitations	Misinterprets directive as mere description or 'critically analyse' reduced to negative criticism only; ignores 'evolving' and 'increasing significance' temporal dimensions
Content depth & accuracy	20%	2	Precise references to all five CARs with accurate policy milestones (2012 Connect Central Asia, 2015 India-Central Asia Dialogue, SCO 2017), correct trade figures, and distinguishes bilateral vs multilateral engagement	Generic treatment of 'Central Asia' without country-specific differentiation; mixes some accurate policies with vague statements; minor factual errors on timelines	Confuses CARs with Caucasus; incorrect institutional references; anachronistic claims; omits economic or strategic dimensions entirely
Structure & flow	20%	2	Tight 150-word discipline with clear tripartite structure (diplomatic-economic-strategic), seamless transitions, and integrated critical assessment within each section rather than isolated 'criticism' paragraph	Identifiable structure but uneven weightage (over-detailed on one dimension), mechanical listing, or critical analysis relegated to conclusion only	Disorganised narrative; no discernible structure; exceeds word limit significantly; abrupt jumps between unrelated points
Examples / case-law / data	20%	2	Specific evidence: Chabahar port operationalisation, TAPI pipeline status, uranium imports from Kazakhstan/Uzbekistan, military training programmes, comparative trade data (India-CAR vs China-CAR)	Mentions Chabahar and SCO but lacks specificity on outcomes; no quantitative data; generic reference to 'energy cooperation' without naming projects	No concrete examples; relies on phrases like 'various projects' or 'several agreements'; factually incorrect examples (e.g., citing INSTC as operational for CARs)
Conclusion & analytical edge	20%	2	Forward-looking synthesis addressing how Ukraine war, Taliban 2.0, and SCO dynamics create opportunity for India; acknowledges hard choices between Russia-West alignment in CAR engagement	Generic conclusion on 'need for more cooperation' or 'mutual benefit'; restates points without synthesis; no geopolitical foresight	Missing conclusion; abrupt ending; or unrealistic claims about India replacing China/Russia influence; ignores 150-word constraint with truncated ending

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →