Geography 2022 Paper I 50 marks 150 words Compulsory Analyse

Q5

Answer the following in about 150 words each: (a) Analyse the effects of Globalisation on languages. (10 marks) (b) "Shifting global trade patterns create new opportunities". Examine this statement. (10 marks) (c) Examine the morphological factors that influence the origin and growth of towns. (10 marks) (d) Discuss the role of transportation accessibility in regional development. (10 marks) (e) Explain the geometrical boundaries with examples. (10 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

निम्नलिखित में से प्रत्येक का उत्तर लगभग 150 शब्दों में दीजिए : (a) भाषाओं पर वैश्वीकरण के प्रभावों का विश्लेषण कीजिए । (10 अंक) (b) "वैश्विक व्यापार प्रतिरूपों का परिवर्तन नवीन अवसर उत्पन्न करता है" । इस कथन का परीक्षण कीजिए । (10 अंक) (c) नगरों की उत्पत्ति एवं विकास को प्रभावित करने वाले आकारिकी कारकों का परीक्षण कीजिए । (10 अंक) (d) प्रादेशिक विकास में परिवहन सुगमता की भूमिका की चर्चा कीजिए । (10 अंक) (e) उदाहरणों सहित ज्यामितीय सीमाओं का वर्णन कीजिए । (10 अंक)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2022 Geography questions

Directive word: Analyse

This question asks you to analyse. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'analyse' for part (a) demands breaking down effects into components; secondary directives 'examine' (b,c), 'discuss' (d), and 'explain' (e) require critical evaluation and elaboration. Allocate ~30 words per sub-part (150 words each), spending roughly equal time across all five parts since marks are equal. Structure each answer with a brief contextual introduction, 2-3 analytical points addressing the specific demand, and a concise concluding observation linking to broader geographical significance.

Key points expected

  • (a) Globalisation and languages: linguistic homogenisation (English dominance), language endangerment/extinction, hybridisation/creolisation, and digital language preservation efforts
  • (b) Shifting trade patterns: rise of South-South trade, Belt and Road Initiative impacts, nearshoring/friendshoring trends, and opportunities for India in services and manufacturing
  • (c) Morphological factors: site characteristics (water supply, drainage, defence), situation/relative location, and urban form evolution (concentric, sector, multiple nuclei models)
  • (d) Transportation accessibility: connectivity as development catalyst, core-periphery reduction, corridor development, and logistics hubs as growth poles
  • (e) Geometrical boundaries: definition as straight-line/arc boundaries, examples (Canada-USA 49th parallel, Egypt-Sudan, Chad-Libya), and problems (dividing communities, resource disputes)

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%10Precisely defines linguistic imperialism, morphological site vs situation, accessibility vs mobility, and geometric vs organic boundaries; for (c) correctly applies Harris-Ullman or Burgess models; for (e) distinguishes between latitudinal, longitudinal and arc boundariesBasic definitions present but conflates site/situation or misidentifies boundary types; superficial treatment of trade theories or urban morphology modelsMajor conceptual errors such as confusing geometric with natural boundaries, treating transportation as automatic development trigger, or equating globalisation solely with English spread without nuance
Map / diagram20%10Includes at least 2-3 relevant sketch maps: for (a) world language diffusion arrows; for (c) urban morphology diagram; for (e) Africa/Middle East geometric boundaries; diagrams are properly labelled, scaled, and integrated with textOne generic map or poorly labelled diagrams; mentions locations without visual representation; urban models described textually onlyNo maps or diagrams; or entirely irrelevant sketches; boundary descriptions without any spatial representation
Indian regional examples20%10For (a) cites English-Hindi tension or Dravidian language activism; for (b) India's trade diversification to ASEAN/Africa; for (c) Delhi's site on Yamuna or Mumbai's island situation; for (d) DMIC or Golden Quadrilateral impacts; for (e) Radcliffe Line geometric problemsGeneric India references without specificity; mentions 'Indian languages' or 'Indian railways' without concrete cases; examples not tied to argumentNo Indian examples; or factually wrong ones (e.g., claiming India has geometric boundaries with all neighbours); exclusively Western case studies
Spatial analysis20%10Demonstrates spatial thinking: for (a) global-local dialectic in language spaces; for (b) shifting trade corridors and new economic geographies; for (c) how topography constrains urban expansion; for (d) accessibility gradients and hinterland hierarchies; for (e) how arbitrary lines fragment cultural regionsSome spatial awareness but descriptive rather than analytical; mentions locations without explaining spatial relationships or processesAspatial treatment; lists factors without geographical reasoning; no sense of scale, distance, or spatial interaction in any sub-part
Application / policy20%10Connects to policy: for (a) UNESCO endangered language programmes or India's language policy; for (b) India's FTAs or PLI scheme; for (c) smart city planning or RURBAN mission; for (d) PMGSY, Bharatmala, or logistics parks policy; for (e) boundary dispute resolution mechanismsBrief policy mention without elaboration; generic statements about 'government should act'; no specific scheme or programme namesNo policy dimension; purely academic treatment; or irrelevant policy suggestions not grounded in geographical reality of the question

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Geography 2022 Paper I