Q6
(a) Give the modern classification of mineral deposits and explain in brief the residual and mechanical concentration deposits with suitable examples. (20 marks) (b) Stating the premise of National Mineral Policy, give the outline of strategic, critical and essential minerals citing Indian examples. (20 marks) (c) Give the mode of occurrence, distribution and uses of manganese deposits of India. (10 marks)
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a) खनिज निक्षेपों का आधुनिक वर्गीकरण दीजिए तथा अवशिष्ट और यांत्रिक सांद्रण निक्षेपों की उपयुक्त उदाहरणों सहित संक्षेप में व्याख्या कीजिए। (20 अंक) (b) राष्ट्रीय खनिज नीति के आधार को स्पष्ट करते हुए एवं भारतीय उदाहरण देते हुए सामरिक, महत्वपूर्ण और आवश्यक खनिजों की रूपरेखा दीजिए। (20 अंक) (c) भारत के मैंगनीज निक्षेपों के प्राप्ति स्वरूप, वितरण और उपयोगिता का वर्णन कीजिए। (10 अंक)
Directive word: Explain
This question asks you to explain. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.
See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
The directive 'explain' demands clear exposition with cause-effect reasoning across all three parts. Allocate approximately 40% of time/words to part (a) given its 20 marks, 35% to part (b), and 25% to part (c). Structure as: brief introduction on mineral resource significance → systematic treatment of (a) with genetic classification → (b) with policy framework and mineral categories → (c) with manganese specifics → concluding synthesis on India's mineral security.
Key points expected
- Part (a): Modern genetic classification of mineral deposits (magmatic, hydrothermal, sedimentary, metamorphic, residual, mechanical) with clear hierarchical structure
- Part (a): Residual concentration deposits: lateritic nickel (Sukinda), bauxite (Panchpatmali), iron ore (Singhbhum); explanation of tropical weathering, iron/alumina enrichment, silica removal
- Part (a): Mechanical concentration deposits: placer gold (Kolar paleoplacers), beach placers (monazite in Kerala-Tamil Nadu coast), cassiterite; explanation of density-based sorting in fluvial/marine environments
- Part (b): Premise of National Mineral Policy 2019: security of supply, sustainable mining, private sector participation, scientific exploration, minimal environmental impact
- Part (b): Strategic minerals (rare earth elements, lithium, cobalt—Chhattisgarh REE belts); Critical minerals (copper, tungsten, molybdenum—Malanjkhand, Degana); Essential minerals (iron, manganese, bauxite, coal—Odisha, Jharkhand belts)
- Part (c): Mode of occurrence: bedded/stratiform deposits in Dharwar Supergroup, associated with iron formations; syngenetic-sedimentary origin with later supergene enrichment
- Part (c): Distribution: Balaghat (Madhya Pradesh)—largest producer, high-grade ore; Nagpur-Bhandara (Maharashtra); Keonjhar, Sundergarh (Odisha); Dharwar (Karnataka); Vizianagaram (Andhra Pradesh)
- Part (c): Uses: ferromanganese in steelmaking (deoxidizer, sulfur control), dry cell batteries, chemical industry, aluminum alloying; India's 7th largest global reserves but import dependence for battery-grade manganese
Evaluation rubric
| Dimension | Weight | Max marks | Excellent | Average | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concept correctness | 25% | 12.5 | Demonstrates precise genetic classification in (a) distinguishing residual vs. mechanical processes with correct geochemical/physical mechanisms; accurately defines strategic/critical/essential categories in (b) per NMP 2019 and critical minerals list; correctly identifies manganese mineralogy (pyrolusite, psilomelane) and syngenetic origin in (c) | Basic classification correct but confuses residual with mechanical processes or omits supergene enrichment; generic policy description without specific mineral categorization; manganese occurrence described but origin unclear | Outdated Lindgren or Bateman classifications without genetic basis; conflates all concentration types; fails to distinguish mineral categories or describes manganese only as 'found in rocks' |
| Diagram / cross-section | 15% | 7.5 | Includes schematic cross-section of laterite profile for residual deposits (A-B-C horizon with duricrust) and fluvial placer channel for mechanical deposits; India's manganese belt map with major mines marked; NMP implementation flowchart | Simple block diagram of laterite or placer without process arrows; rough sketch of manganese distribution; no policy diagram | No diagrams despite clear visual potential; or irrelevant diagrams copied from memory without question linkage |
| Field evidence | 15% | 7.5 | Cites specific deposits: Sukinda lateritic chromite over peridotite, Ratnagiri bauxite; Kolar gold field paleoplacers, Manavalakurichi beach placers; Balaghat's 40m+ thick ore zones, MOIL operations; references GSI or AMD exploration data | Mentions generic 'eastern ghats' or 'central India' without specific mine names; states 'beach sands of Kerala' without mineral specifics; Balaghat mentioned without grade/reserve data | No named Indian deposits; foreign examples only (Guinea bauxite, Witwatersrand gold); or fictional locations |
| Quantitative reasoning | 15% | 7.5 | Provides reserve figures: India 142 MT manganese reserves (5% global), Balaghat 40% national production; bauxite 3.9 BT reserves; REE 6.9 MT; policy targets like 33% exploration area auctioned; grade distinctions (46%+ Mn for battery grade vs. 35% for ferromanganese) | Round figures like 'India has large reserves' or 'major producer'; mentions MOIL production without tonnage; vague 'high grade' without percentage | No quantitative data; incorrect orders of magnitude; confuses reserve with resource figures |
| Indian / economic relevance | 30% | 15 | Links NMP 2019 to Atmanirbhar Bharat, Make in India; explains import vulnerability for critical minerals (100% lithium, cobalt); manganese's role in steel sector (2nd largest producer target 300MT by 2030); environmental-social governance in tribal mining areas; India's NET ZERO implications for mineral demand | Mentions policy exists without contemporary relevance; states manganese is 'important for steel' without sectoral linkage; generic 'minerals are important for economy' | No policy context; treats question as purely academic mineralogy without economic-geography integration; outdated 1993 or 2008 NMP references without 2019 update |
Practice this exact question
Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.
Evaluate my answer →More from Geology 2021 Paper II
- Q1 Answer the following questions in about 150 words each: (a) How does one designate mirror plane, rotational axes of symmetry and centre of…
- Q2 (a) Give the classification scheme of silicate minerals on the basis of atomic structure, Si : O ratio and number of shared oxygen. Give su…
- Q3 (a) Discuss briefly the processes of magma generation in the Earth's interior. How is grain size of an igneous rock related to the rate of…
- Q4 (a) What is provenance? How can we use clastic quartz, feldspars and lithic grains in provenance interpretation of sandstones? (20 marks) (…
- Q5 Answer the following questions in about 150 words each: (a) Lead (Pb) mineralization zone is drawn in the given diagram with nomenclature.…
- Q6 (a) Give the modern classification of mineral deposits and explain in brief the residual and mechanical concentration deposits with suitabl…
- Q7 (a) State the characteristic features of cosmic abundance of elements. What are the bases of estimation of cosmic abundance of elements? (2…
- Q8 (a) How is unscientific development of catchments situated in mountainous regions responsible for increased threat of floods in plains? (10…