Q5
Answer the following questions in about 150 words each: (a) Illustrate the main features of Vesara style temple architecture. (b) Evaluate Firuz Shah Tughluq's economic policies. (c) Evaluate the contribution of Qalandariyyah to medieval Indian culture. (d) Discuss the main features of Malwa school of painting with examples. (e) Highlight the features of Portuguese colonial enterprise.
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
निम्नलिखित प्रत्येक प्रश्न का उत्तर लगभग 150 शब्दों में दीजिए: (a) वेसर शैली के मंदिर स्थापत्य की मुख्य विशेषताएं बताइए। (b) फिरोज शाह तुगलक की आर्थिक नीतियों का मूल्यांकन कीजिए। (c) मध्यकालीन भारतीय संस्कृति में कलंदरिया के योगदान का मूल्यांकन कीजिए। (d) मालवा चित्रकला शैली की मुख्य विशेषताओं की उदाहरण सहित चर्चा कीजिए। (e) पुर्तगाली औपनिवेशिक उपक्रम की विशेषताओं पर प्रकाश डालिए।
Directive word: Evaluate
This question asks you to evaluate. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.
See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
The directive 'evaluate' demands balanced judgment with evidence across all five sub-parts. Allocate approximately 30 words (20% time) per sub-part for (a) Vesara style, (b) Firuz Shah's economic policies, (c) Qalandariyyah contribution, (d) Malwa painting, and (e) Portuguese colonialism—ensuring each receives substantive treatment with specific examples and critical assessment rather than mere description. Structure as five distinct but thematically connected paragraphs without a separate introduction or conclusion.
Key points expected
- (a) Vesara style: Hybrid Nagara-Dravida origin; Deccan geography (Aihole, Badami, Pattadakal); specific features like ornate vimana, stellate plan, intricate carvings; examples—Lad Khan temple, Durga temple at Aihole
- (b) Firuz Shah Tughluq: Agricultural focus (Firozabad, Hissar-Firoza, Jaunpur); irrigation (canals from Yamuna, Sutlej); land revenue reforms (fixed assessment, hereditary grants); market controls; critical assessment of long-term sustainability vs. short-term welfare
- (c) Qalandariyyah: Unorthodox Sufi order; rejection of formalism; influence on Bhakti movement (Kabir, Nanak); cultural synthesis; music and poetry; challenge to orthodox Islam; urban popular culture in Delhi and Bengal
- (d) Malwa school: Origins under Khalji and Malwa sultans; synthesis of indigenous and Persian elements; delicate lines, subdued colors, naturalistic landscapes; examples—Nimatnama, Gitagovinda manuscripts; Mandu as center
- (e) Portuguese colonialism: Estado da Índia; cartaz system; monopoly trade (spices, horses); religious conversion; fortification (Goa, Daman, Diu); decline by late 16th century; long-term impact on Indian Ocean trade networks
Evaluation rubric
| Dimension | Weight | Max marks | Excellent | Average | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chronology accuracy | 20% | 10 | Precise dating across all sub-parts: for (a) 7th-8th century Chalukya context; (b) 1351-1388 reign period with specific campaign dates; (c) 13th-14th century emergence; (d) 15th-16th century flourishing; (e) 1498 arrival, 1510 Goa capture, 16th-century consolidation—no anachronistic conflations | Broadly correct century markers with minor errors (e.g., vague 'medieval period' for Vesara, or conflating Firuz Shah with Muhammad bin Tughluq); some temporal imprecision in Portuguese phases | Significant chronological errors—placing Vesara in Chola period, Firuz Shah in 13th century, or Portuguese decline in 17th century without qualification; confused dynastic sequencing |
| Source & evidence | 20% | 10 | Specific architectural terminology (vimana, mandapa, stellate plan) for (a); Firuz Shah's Futuhat-i-Firozshahi and Shams-i-Siraj Afif for (b); Amir Khusrau and Sufi malfuzat for (c); named manuscripts (Nimatnama, Gitagovinda) for (d); Barros, Correa, and Portuguese factory records for (e) | Generic references without precise titles—mentions 'Sufi texts' without naming, 'Portuguese chronicles' without specificity; some examples given but without manuscript or architectural detail | No primary source citation; reliance on textbook generalizations; incorrect or fabricated examples (e.g., citing Taj Mahal for Vesara, or Mughal paintings for Malwa school) |
| Multi-perspective analysis | 20% | 10 | Critical evaluation across all parts: for (b) contrasts welfare measures with fiscal strain and iqta deterioration; for (c) balances spiritual contribution against orthodox criticism; for (e) assesses Portuguese impact from indigenous trader, Mughal, and European competitor viewpoints; for (d) compares Malwa with contemporary Rajput and Sultanate schools | Some evaluative language but predominantly descriptive; limited counter-arguments or alternative viewpoints; one-sided assessment of Firuz Shah as 'benevolent' without critical nuance | Purely descriptive with no evaluation; no recognition of historiographical debates; uncritical acceptance of nationalist or colonial narratives; missing alternative perspectives entirely |
| Historiographic framing | 20% | 10 | Engages with scholarly debates: for (b) references W.H. Moreland vs. Mohammad Habib on agrarian policy; for (c) cites Simon Digby or Richard Eaton on Sufi popular culture; for (e) uses Sanjay Subrahmanyam on Portuguese Indian Ocean networks; for (d) acknowledges Karl Khandalavala or Anand Coomaraswamy on regional schools | Implicit awareness of scholarly positions without explicit naming; some indication that interpretations vary but no specific historians cited; standard textbook historiography reproduced | No historiographical awareness; presents all information as uncontested fact; anachronistic modern judgments imposed on medieval contexts; no recognition of changing scholarly interpretations |
| Conclusion & synthesis | 20% | 10 | Subtle thematic connections across sub-parts—synthesizing how regional architectural styles (a), syncretic religious movements (c), and provincial painting schools (d) reflect decentralized cultural production; or connecting Firuz Shah's agrarianism (b) with Portuguese commercial extraction (e) as contrasting economic logics; each sub-part achieves closure while contributing to overall coherence | Competent closure to individual sub-parts without explicit cross-referencing; some implicit thematic links but not articulated; conclusion perfunctory or absent in some sections | Abrupt endings without synthesis; no connection between sub-parts; trailing off or repetition instead of conclusion; structural incoherence with parts appearing disconnected |
Practice this exact question
Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.
Evaluate my answer →More from History 2024 Paper I
- Q1 Identify the following places marked on the map supplied to you and write a short note of about 30 words on each of them in your Question-c…
- Q2 (a) Harappan art contributes to our understanding of their aesthetic sensibilities in addition to spiritual and ritualistic life. Comment.…
- Q3 (a) Symbiotic relationships between Buddhist establishments, traders, artisan guilds, and royal support led to a close proximity of religio…
- Q4 (a) Highlight the contributions of Aryabhatta, Varahamihira and Brahmagupta in the fields of Astronomy and Mathematics. (20 marks) (b) Exam…
- Q5 Answer the following questions in about 150 words each: (a) Illustrate the main features of Vesara style temple architecture. (b) Evaluate…
- Q6 (a) Analyze the contributions of Acharya Triumvirate to Indian Vedanta. (20 marks) (b) Compare and contrast the position of Hindu and Musli…
- Q7 (a) "Instead of bringing credit, the Ibadat Khana brought growing discredit to Akbar." Comment. (20 marks) (b) How did the Maratha guerrill…
- Q8 (a) Discuss the contributions of Bahmani Sultans to the development of Indo-Islamic architecture. (20 marks) (b) Evaluate the impact of the…