Paper I — Q3
(a) Briefly explain the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) with industry illustrations. Critically evaluate major…
Briefly explain the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) with industry illustrations. Critically evaluate major initiatives developed by multilateral agencies to measure CSR activities. 20 marks
"If money does not make you happy, you are not spending it right." Give your views on the statement in context of money being a tool for motivation. 15 marks
Briefly explain the distinguishing features between domestic and International Human Resource Management (IHRM). Critically evaluate pros and cons of employing Host Country Nationals (HCNs), Parent Country Nationals (PCNs) and Third Country Nationals (TCNs). 15 marks
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
उद्योग-धंधों के उदाहरणों के साथ नैगमिक सामाजिक दायित्व (सी एस आर) की अवधारणा को संक्षेप में समझाइये । सी एस आर गतिविधियों को मापने के लिए बहुपक्षीय अभिकरणों द्वारा विकसित प्रमुख पहलों का आलोचनात्मक ढंग से मूल्यांकन कीजिए । 20
"यदि रुपया-पैसा आपको खुशी नहीं देता है तो आप उसको उचित ढंग से खर्च नहीं कर रहे हैं ।" रुपया-पैसा अभिप्रेरणा का एक साधन है, इस संदर्भ के साथ इस कथन पर अपने विचार व्यक्त कीजिए । 15
देशीय एवं अंतर्राष्ट्रीय मानव संसाधन प्रबंध (आई एच आर एम) में अंतर करने वाली विशेषताओं को संक्षेप में समझाइये । मेजबान देश के नागरिकों (एच सी एनएस) मूल देश के नागरिकों (पी सी एनएस) और किसी तीसरे देश के नागरिकों (टी सी एनएस) को रोजगार देने से होने वाले भले और बुरे परिणामों का आलोचनात्मक ढंग से मूल्यांकन कीजिए । 15
Model answer
Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.
(a) Corporate Social Responsibility and its measurement
CSR is a firm's commitment to operate ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of workers, communities and society, going beyond legal compliance. In India, Section 135 of the Companies Act 2013 requires companies with net worth of ₹500 crore or more, turnover of ₹1,000 crore or more, or net profit of ₹5 crore or more to spend at least 2% of average net profit of the preceding three years on activities in Schedule VII, through a CSR committee. Illustrations: Tata group's work in health, education and rural development; Infosys Foundation in education and healthcare; ITC's e-Choupal, which improved farmers' incomes and its own sourcing.
Multilateral initiatives to measure CSR:
The UN Global Compact asks firms to follow ten principles on human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption and to report annually. It is wide-reaching but voluntary, with weak enforcement.
The Global Reporting Initiative provides widely used standards for sustainability reporting on economic, environmental and social performance. It allows comparison, but reporting is not the same as impact and can be selective.
ISO 26000 gives guidance on social responsibility in seven core subjects, but it cannot be certified. SA 8000 is auditable and certifies labour standards. The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights set expectations on conduct and due diligence.
Overall these frameworks raise transparency and common standards, but being voluntary and focused on inputs and disclosure, they need independent verification and impact measures such as social return on investment.
(b) Money as a motivator
The statement, from Dunn and Norton's Happy Money, suggests money gives happiness only when spent well. It touches the role of money as a motivational tool.
Money matters because it meets basic and security needs (Maslow), and in expectancy theory, it motivates when people believe effort leads to performance and performance to a valued reward. Herzberg, however, regarded pay as mainly a hygiene factor, preventing dissatisfaction but not producing lasting motivation, and research shows that beyond a basic level, extra pay adds little satisfaction.
How money is used matters: spending on experiences, on other people and on buying time brings more happiness than on material goods. For managers, pay works best when linked fairly and visibly to performance, combined with recognition, growth and meaningful work. I partly agree: money is a real but incomplete motivator.
(c) International HRM and the use of HCNs, PCNs and TCNs
IHRM differs from domestic HRM in having more activities, such as international relocation, taxation, orientation and language training, a wider perspective across many countries and workforce types, greater involvement in employees' personal lives, more risk exposure, and wider external influences from differences in law, culture and politics.
Host country nationals: lower cost, local knowledge, language, goodwill and continuity, with less relocation problem; but limited ties with headquarters, and weaker control and promotion prospects.
Parent country nationals: knowledge of company culture, control and trust, and good for transferring skills; but high cost, adjustment problems, blocked local promotion and possible local resentment.
Third country nationals: often cheaper than PCNs, with international experience and language skills; but possible host-country sensitivity, and weak loyalty to the headquarters, and visa constraints.
A balanced mix, shaped by strategy and local conditions, is usually used.
How this answer will be evaluated
Framework: Stakeholder Theory / CSR Frameworks (e
What earns full marks: Comprehensive coverage of all parts with specific examples, critical analysis, and clear structure.
Evaluation rubric
Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.
- (a) Explain CSR with industry illustrations and critically evaluate major multilateral initiatives to measure CSR activities. 20 marks
critically evaluate— positives → negatives/limits → conditions/safeguards → conclusion
Must cover
- CSR concept with Companies Act 2013 Section 135 provisions
- Industry illustrations such as Tata, Infosys Foundation, ITC
- Evaluation of UN Global Compact, GRI, ISO 26000 and similar frameworks
Loses marks
- Only philanthropy described
- Frameworks listed with no evaluation
Earns more
- SA 8000, OECD Guidelines and UN Guiding Principles named
Extra mark
- Social return on investment or impact measurement
- (b) Give your views on the statement 'If money does not make you happy, you are not spending it right' in the context of money as a motivational tool. 15 marks
comment— context → arguments both sides → judgment → close
Must cover
- Explanation of the statement and its basis
- Motivation theories on money: Maslow, Herzberg, expectancy
- A reasoned personal view
Loses marks
- Money presented as the only motivator
- No personal stand
Earns more
- Spending on experiences and others
- Pay linked to performance, combined with non-financial motivators
Extra mark
- Satisfaction plateau beyond a basic level
- (c) Explain the distinguishing features of domestic and international HRM and critically evaluate the pros and cons of employing HCNs, PCNs and TCNs. 15 marks
critically evaluate— positives → negatives/limits → conditions/safeguards → conclusion
Must cover
- Features of IHRM: more activities, wider perspective, risk, external influences
- Pros and cons of HCNs and PCNs
- Pros and cons of TCNs
Loses marks
- HCN, PCN and TCN definitions confused
Earns more
- Staffing mix guided by strategy
Extra mark
- Relocation, taxation and orientation as IHRM activities
What "Critically evaluate" is asking you to do
Judge how well something has performed against the standard it set for itself — its stated aim, mandate or promise — and commit to a verdict. Name the yardstick before you judge; an unanchored judgement reads as opinion. “Critically” is not a section added at the end: name the yardstick you are judging by — the evidence, the stated objective, a constitutional principle, a rival explanation — and let a verdict close each part of the body. Where the question quotes a claim, that verdict must land on the claim itself, accepted, qualified or rejected, and not on the theme in general.
Structure that answers it
Name the yardstick — stated aim, mandate or benchmark → performance against it → shortfall against it → why the gap exists → verdict
Where marks are lost
Merits in one paragraph, demerits in the next, and a conclusion calling for a balanced and holistic approach. That is a survey with the judgement left out and it holds the answer in the middle band. The opposite error is reading “critically” as permission to attack — and with the odd pairings, critically describe or critically explain, the exposition still carries most of the marks, the judgement being a layer on it rather than a substitute for it.
Practice this exact question
Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.
Evaluate my answer →More from Management 2021 Paper I
- Q1 (a) 'Globalization' seems to be at 'cross-roads' as increasingly large number of countrie…
- Q2 (a) Compare the process and effectiveness of : (i) Interacting (ii) Brainstorming (iii) N…
- Q3 (a) Briefly explain the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) with industry il…
- Q4 (a) List the various types of conceptual blocks that come in the way of thinking creative…
- Q5 (a) Elucidate the basic process of marketing communication. What makes international mark…
- Q6 (a) What is Variance Analysis ? What are the possible reasons for different Cost Variance…