(a) (i) What is e-business architecture? Which technological innovations have had a major impact on it? 5 marks
(ii) Describe the four pillars of e-governance and the various types of interactions performed in e-governance. 5 marks
(iii) Discuss the

Question

(a) (i) What is e-business architecture? Which technological innovations have had a major impact on it? 5 marks
(ii) Describe the four pillars of e-governance and the various types of interactions performed in e-governance. 5 marks
(iii) Discuss the Indian Government's efforts and actions towards implementing e-governance. 5 marks
(b) (i) Solve the following Linear Programming Problem by Graphical Method: 10 marks
Minimize cost:
C = 5x₁ + 6x₂
subject to:
x₁ + x₂ = 1000
x₁ ≤ 300
x₂ ≥ 150
x₁, x₂ ≥ 0
(ii) A certain drug is claimed to be effective in curing cold. In an experiment on 500 persons suffering from cold, half of them were given the drug and the other half were given the sugar pills. Patients' reactions to the treatment are recorded in the following table:

| Treatment | Helped | Harmed | No Effect |
|-----------|--------|--------|-----------|
| Drug | 150 | 30 | 70 |
| Sugar pills | 130 | 40 | 80 |
| Total | 280 | 70 | 150 |

On the basis of the above data, can it be concluded that there is a significant difference in the effect of drug and sugar pills? 10 marks
(c) (i) Apply the concept of "Decay Curve of New Product Ideas" to an innovative product like 'e-Bike'. 5 marks
(ii) A manufacturing company always uses a sample size of 10. Data for the past 10 samples are as follows:

| Number of Defective Units | Total Units Sampled |
|---|---|
| 150 | 1,000 |

The system is believed to be operating under normal conditions.
(A) Construct a control chart with control limits such that measurements for 95% of the units under normal conditions would fall within the control limits. 5 marks
(B) Suppose the number of units defective in the next 5 samples are:
3, 4, 2, 0 and 7.
Demonstrate graphically whether the process is under control or not. 5 marks

UPSC Answer Check · Accepted Answer

This multi-part question requires solving numerical problems alongside descriptive answers. Begin with (b)(i) LPP graphical solution and (b)(ii) chi-square test as they carry 20 marks combined—allocate ~35% time here. For (a)(i)-(iii), structure definitions first, then pillars/interactions, followed by Indian e-governance initiatives like Digital India and UMANG. For (c), apply the decay curve concept to e-Bike innovation stages, then construct p-chart for quality control with clear graphical demonstration. Conclude with integrated insights on technology-management convergence.
- (a)(i) E-business architecture definition covering infrastructure, application, and integration layers; technological innovations like cloud computing, IoT, AI/ML, blockchain, and 5G networks
- (a)(ii) Four pillars of e-governance (People, Process, Technology, Resources) and G2G, G2C, G2B, G2E interaction types with brief explanations
- (a)(iii) Indian e-governance efforts: Digital India, UMANG, DigiLocker, e-Hospital, GSTN, NeGP, and state initiatives like Karnataka's Bhoomi or Andhra Pradesh's e-Pragati
- (b)(i) Correct graphical LPP solution: identify feasible region from equality constraint x₁+x₂=1000 intersecting with x₁≤300 and x₂≥150, optimal point at (300,700), minimum cost C=5(300)+6(700)=5700
- (b)(ii) Chi-square test for independence: calculate expected frequencies, χ² statistic, compare with critical value at 5% or 1% significance, conclude on drug effectiveness claim
- (c)(i) Decay curve application to e-Bike: idea generation stage, screening and evaluation, business analysis, product development, test marketing, commercialization with attrition at each stage
- (c)(ii) p-chart construction: center line p̄=150/1000=0.15, control limits UCL/LCL = p̄ ± 3√[p̄(1-p̄)/n], plot sample proportions 0.3,0.4,0.2,0,0.7 to show out-of-control signals

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Concept correctness	25%	12.5	Precise definitions of e-business architecture components; accurate identification of four e-governance pillars; mathematically correct LPP solution with proper feasible region identification and optimal point calculation; correct chi-square test procedure with proper degrees of freedom and conclusion; accurate decay curve stages application to e-Bike; correct p-chart formulas with proper control limit calculation	Basic definitions present but some technical inaccuracies; LPP attempted with minor calculation errors; chi-square test applied but with wrong expected frequencies or significance level; decay curve mentioned but stages misapplied; p-chart constructed with formula errors	Vague or incorrect definitions; major mathematical errors in LPP or chi-square; confusion between control charts; fundamental misunderstanding of decay curve or e-governance pillars
Framework citation	15%	7.5	Explicit mention of Back and Rogers' e-governance framework; reference to Wirtz's e-business architecture model; citation of Booz Allen Hamilton's new product development decay curve; proper statistical frameworks (chi-square distribution, Shewhart control charts); use of standard LPP graphical method conventions	Implicit use of frameworks without naming; correct methodology but missing attribution; generic references to 'models' without specificity	No framework identification; ad-hoc approaches without theoretical grounding; confusion between different management/statistical frameworks
Case / Indian example	20%	10	Specific Indian e-governance examples: Digital India (2015), UMANG app, DigiLocker, Aadhaar integration, GST Network, NeGP components like CSCs; state-level initiatives (Seva Sindhu, e-District); Indian e-Bike market context (Ola Electric, Ather Energy, Hero Electric); Make in India relevance for quality control	Generic mention of 'government portals' without naming; international examples when Indian ones expected; e-Bike discussion without Indian market context	No Indian examples; irrelevant foreign cases; complete absence of contemporary e-governance initiatives
Multi-perspective analysis	20%	10	For (a): technology, administrative reform, and citizen-centric perspectives on e-governance; for (b)(ii): both statistical significance and practical/clinical significance of drug trial; for (c)(i): marketing, technical feasibility, and financial viability perspectives in decay curve; for (c)(ii): producer risk vs consumer risk in quality control; integration of quantitative and qualitative insights across all parts	Single perspective dominance; quantitative focus without interpretation or vice versa; partial integration between sub-parts	Fragmented treatment with no connection between sub-parts; purely mechanical solutions without analysis; missing alternative interpretations of data
Conclusion & recommendation	20%	10	Synthesized conclusion linking e-governance challenges to technological solutions; clear statement on drug effectiveness based on statistical evidence; actionable recommendations for e-Bike innovation management based on decay curve insights; process control recommendations with specific corrective actions for out-of-control signals; forward-looking statement on Industry 4.0 integration	Summary restatement of findings without synthesis; generic recommendations not tied to specific analysis; missing conclusion for some sub-parts	Abrupt ending without conclusion; conclusions contradicting earlier analysis; no recommendations despite analytical findings; irrelevant or impractical suggestions

Q3

Directive word: Solve

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Key points expected

Evaluation rubric

Practice this exact question

More from Management 2021 Paper II