Management 2022 Paper I 50 marks Explain

Q7

(a) Why is Budgetary control required in a business concern ? What are its limitations ? (15 marks) (b) What is modified internal rate of return (MIRR) ? What are the pros and cons of MIRR vis-a-vis IRR & NPV ? (15 marks) (c) (i) Explain the concept of Product Life Cycle (PLC) and its applicability for the following : (1) Mobile phone (2) Tea (10 marks) (ii) Suggest marketing strategies in different phases of PLC for the above products. (10 marks)

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) व्यापारिक प्रतिष्ठान में बजटीय नियंत्रण की आवश्यकता क्यों होती है ? उसकी सीमायें क्या हैं ? (15 अंक) (b) संशोधित आंतरिक वापसी दर (MIRR) क्या है ? प्रतिफल की आंतरिक दर (IRR) और शुद्ध वर्तमान मूल्य (NPV) की तुलना में इसके लाभ या हानियाँ क्या हैं । (15 अंक) (c) (i) उत्पाद जीवन चक्र की संकल्पना समझायें तथा निम्नलिखित के लिये उसकी प्रयोज्यता बतायें : (1) मोबाइल फोन (2) चाय (10 अंक) (ii) उपर दिये गये उत्पादों के उत्पाद जीवन चक्र के विभिन्न चरणों के लिये विपणन रणनीति सुझाइये । (10 अंक)

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2022 Management questions

Directive word: Explain

This question asks you to explain. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The question demands explanation across four sub-parts: allocate approximately 30% time to (a) on budgetary control rationale and limitations; 30% to (b) on MIRR mechanics and comparative capital budgeting analysis; 25% to (c)(i) on PLC theory applied to mobile phones and tea; and 15% to (c)(ii) on phase-specific marketing strategies. Structure with brief introductions for each sub-part, analytical body addressing both 'why' and 'what' dimensions, and integrated conclusion linking financial control to marketing lifecycle decisions.

Key points expected

  • (a) Budgetary control: need arising from planning, coordination, control, and performance evaluation functions; limitations including rigidity, time-lag, behavioral resistance, and environmental uncertainty
  • (b) MIRR: definition as reinvestment-rate adjusted IRR assuming positive cash flows reinvested at cost of capital; pros (eliminates multiple IRR problem, realistic reinvestment assumption) and cons (complexity, reinvestment rate subjectivity) versus IRR and NPV
  • (c)(i) PLC stages (introduction, growth, maturity, decline); mobile phone as fast-cycle/short PLC with rapid innovation; tea as slow-cycle/extended maturity with cultural anchoring in India
  • (c)(ii) Phase-specific strategies: mobile phones—skimming/rapid innovation in introduction, mass marketing in growth, differentiation in maturity, harvesting/divestment in decline; tea—education sampling in introduction, brand building in growth, line extension in maturity, niche repositioning in decline
  • Integration: link between capital budgeting precision (MIRR) and marketing resource allocation across PLC stages for optimal budgetary control

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%10Precise definitions: for (a) distinguishes feedforward/feedback/control in budgetary systems; for (b) correctly computes MIRR logic (terminal value of inflows/present value of outflows)^(1/n)-1; for (c) accurately maps PLC curve shapes and duration differences between technology and FMCG productsBasic definitions correct but conflates budgetary control with budgeting, treats MIRR as 'better IRR' without mechanics, or applies generic PLC without stage-specific characteristics for mobile phones vs teaFundamental errors: confuses budgetary control with standard costing, cannot distinguish MIRR from IRR mathematically, or misidentifies tea as having rapid PLC like technology products
Framework citation20%10Cites authoritative frameworks: for (a) Horngren's responsibility accounting or Argyris' budgetary participation; for (b) Brigham-Ehrhardt capital budgeting hierarchy; for (c) Levitt's PLC (1965) or Kotler's marketing management applications; references RBI/SEBI guidelines on financial controls where relevantMentions generic 'management experts' without names, or cites only one framework across all sub-parts without disciplinary specificityNo framework attribution; presents concepts as self-evident or personal opinion without theoretical grounding
Case / Indian example20%10Rich Indian illustrations: for (a) Railway Budget integration or PSU performance budgeting; for (b) NHAI project evaluation or renewable energy IRR-MIRR comparisons; for (c) Micromax/Karbonn PLC trajectory vs Tata Tea/Amul Tea's maturity stage strategies; cites Make in India implicationsGeneric examples (Apple for mobile phones, Lipton for tea) without Indian specificity, or Indian examples mentioned but not analyzed for PLC stage or budgetary relevanceNo Indian examples; relies entirely on foreign cases or hypothetical illustrations without grounding in Indian business context
Multi-perspective analysis20%10Demonstrates cross-functional integration: links (a) budgetary rigidity problems to (c) PLC uncertainty in fast-cycle industries; contrasts NPV's absolute value creation with MIRR's percentage return for (b) capital rationing decisions; balances financial control (a,b) with marketing flexibility (c) in organizational designTreats sub-parts in isolation without cross-referencing; answers each mechanically without showing how budgetary control affects PLC resource allocation or how MIRR informs investment in new product developmentFragmented response with no connective tissue; appears as four separate answers pasted together without unified management perspective
Conclusion & recommendation20%10Synthesizes into actionable insight: recommends hybrid budgeting (rolling forecasts + zero-base) for PLC volatility; advocates MIRR-NPV combined approach for Indian infrastructure; proposes stage-gate budgeting linking capital allocation to PLC milestones; addresses contemporary relevance (digital disruption, ESG budgeting)Summarizes points made without forward-looking synthesis; generic conclusion that 'budgetary control and PLC are important'No conclusion; ends abruptly with last sub-part, or introduces entirely new concepts not developed in body

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Management 2022 Paper I