Medical Science 2022 Paper II 50 marks Describe

Q6

(a) Define 'pre-eclampsia'. Enumerate the risk factors which may lead to this condition. What are its clinical signs and what are its alarming symptoms ? Outline in brief its management. 3+5+6+6=20 (b) Describe clinical features, diagnosis and management of ileo-caecal tuberculosis. 5+5+5=15 (c) (i) What are the objectives of investigating an epidemic ? (ii) Briefly state the various steps you would undertake while investigating an epidemic. 5+10=15

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) प्री-एक्लेम्पसिया को परिभाषित कीजिए। उन जोखिमकारक तत्वों को गिनाइए जिनके कारण यह रुग्णता उत्पन्न हो सकती है। इस रुग्णता के क्या-क्या रोगलक्षण संकेत हैं और क्या-क्या संकट-सूचक लक्षण हैं ? इस रुग्णता के प्रबंधन की रूपरेखा संक्षेप में प्रस्तुत कीजिए। 3+5+6+6=20 (b) शेषान्त्र-उपदुकीय ट्यूबरकुलोसिस की रोगलाक्षणिक विशिष्टताओं, निदान तथा प्रबंधन का वर्णन कीजिए। 5+5+5=15 (c) (i) किसी जानपदिक की जांच करने के क्या-क्या उद्देश्य होते हैं ? (ii) किसी जानपदिक की जांच करते समय अपनाए जाने वाले विभिन्न चरणों का संक्षेप में वर्णन कीजिए। 5+10=15

Directive word: Describe

This question asks you to describe. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'describe' demands comprehensive, structured coverage of clinical entities and processes across all four sub-parts. Allocate approximately 40% of time/words to part (a) given its 20 marks, 30% to part (b) for 15 marks, and 30% combined to (c)(i) and (c)(ii) for 15 marks. Structure as: (a) definition → risk factors → clinical signs → alarming symptoms → management; (b) clinical features → diagnosis → management; (c) objectives → systematic investigation steps. Use Indian epidemiological data (e.g., NFHS-5 for maternal health, RNTCP for TB, IDSP for outbreak investigation) throughout.

Key points expected

  • Part (a): Precise definition of pre-eclampsia (new-onset hypertension + proteinuria after 20 weeks); risk factors include nulliparity, chronic hypertension, multiple gestation, renal disease; clinical signs (BP ≥140/90, proteinuria, edema); alarming symptoms (headache, visual disturbances, epigastric pain, hyperreflexia); management per FIGO/WHO guidelines with antihypertensives, magnesium sulfate, delivery timing
  • Part (b): Ileo-caecal TB features (abdominal pain, mass, obstruction, alternating constipation-diarrhea); diagnosis via colonoscopy with biopsy (caseating granulomas), CT/MRI showing 'comb sign', ascitic fluid ADA, GeneXpert MTB/RIF; ATT regimen per RNTCP (2HRZE/4HRE) with surgery for complications
  • Part (c)(i): Epidemic investigation objectives: verify diagnosis, determine extent, identify source/mode of transmission, implement control, formulate hypotheses, train personnel
  • Part (c)(ii): Systematic steps: prepare for field work, establish existence of epidemic, verify diagnosis, define and count cases, orient data by person/place/time, formulate/test hypotheses, implement control measures, communicate findings (reference IDSP outbreak response protocol)
  • Integration: Application of Indian public health frameworks (RNTCP, IDSP, MCP) and recent epidemiological data (e.g., rising TB-DM comorbidity, maternal mortality trends)

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%10For (a): Accurate ISHHP/ACOG definition distinguishing pre-eclampsia from gestational hypertension; for (b): Correct pathophysiology of ileo-caecal TB as intestinal form with ulcerative/hypertrophic types; for (c): Precise epidemiological terminology (attack rate, case fatality, epidemic threshold) per IDSP manualBasic definitions correct but misses nuanced distinctions (e.g., pre-eclampsia vs eclampsia timing, primary vs secondary intestinal TB); some epidemiological terms used impreciselyFundamental errors in definition (e.g., pre-eclampsia before 20 weeks), confuses ileo-caecal TB with Crohn's pathophysiology, or misstates epidemic investigation purpose
Clinical correlation20%10For (a): Links HELLP syndrome, eclampsia progression; for (b): Correlates ileo-caecal TB presentation with malabsorption, fistula formation; for (c): Connects investigation steps to real Indian outbreaks (e.g., Nipah in Kerala, AES in Bihar) with demographic risk profilingMentions complications superficially without mechanistic explanation; generic outbreak examples without Indian context; limited integration of clinical findingsNo clinical correlation shown; lists facts without disease progression understanding; fails to mention any Indian epidemiological context
Diagram / pathway15%7.5Includes labeled diagram of placental vasculature in pre-eclampsia (shallow trophoblast invasion) OR epidemic curve (histogram) for part (c); flowchart for management algorithm; clear visual representation of investigation stepsMentions need for diagrams but execution poor or absent; rough sketch without labels; text description substitutes for visualNo diagrams despite clear visual potential; completely text-based answer where figures would significantly aid explanation
Differential / staging20%10For (a): Distinguishes pre-eclampsia from chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, renal disease; severity staging (mild vs severe); for (b): Differentiates from Crohn's disease, lymphoma, carcinoma, ameboma; for (c): Classifies outbreak types (common source vs propagated vs mixed)Lists differentials without distinguishing features; mentions severity but no clear criteria; basic outbreak classification without applicationNo differential diagnosis attempted; confuses conditions entirely; misses critical distinctions affecting management
Management / public-health angle25%12.5For (a): Evidence-based management (labetalol, nifedipine, magnesium sulfate prophylaxis, delivery timing per severity); for (b): RNTCP Category I/III regimen, surgery indications (obstruction, perforation); for (c): IDSP protocol implementation, notification, vaccination response, health education—demonstrates field applicabilityGeneric management without specific drug dosages or guidelines; mentions ATT without regimen details; basic outbreak control without systematic approachOutdated or dangerous management suggestions; no public health perspective; ignores national program frameworks (RNTCP, IDSP, MCP)

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Medical Science 2022 Paper II