Medical Science 2024 Paper II 50 marks Describe

Q8

(a) (i) What are the different types of epidemiological studies? (ii) What are the possible sources of control in case-control studies? (iii) List the advantages of case-control studies as compared to cohort studies. 6+6+8=20 (b) Define Antenatal Care. What are its objectives? What is the schedule of antenatal clinic visits that a mother is expected to follow during the course of her pregnancy? What are the advantages and disadvantages of 'domiciliary midwifery service'? 15 (c) (i) Enumerate the causes of hematuria in a 60-year-old male. (ii) Briefly describe the management of carcinoma prostate in a 60-year-old male. 5+10=15

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) (i) विभिन्न प्रकार के जनपदिक रोगविज्ञानीय अध्ययन कौन-कौन से हैं? (ii) केस-कंट्रोल अध्ययनों में, कंट्रोल लेने के संभावित स्रोत कौन-कौन से हैं? (iii) कोहर्ट अध्ययनों की तुलना में केस-कंट्रोल अध्ययनों के क्या-क्या लाभ हैं, सूची बनाइए। 6+6+8=20 (b) जन्मपूर्व देखरेख (एंटीनेटल केयर) को परिभाषित कीजिए। उसके क्या-क्या उद्देश्य हैं? गर्भावस्था के दौरान सगर्भा माता को कब-कब एंटीनेटल क्लिनिक जाना आवश्यक है? 'गृह प्रसूति सहायक सेवा' के क्या-क्या लाभ और क्या-क्या हानियाँ हैं? 15 (c) (i) एक 60-वर्षीय पुरुष में रक्तमेह के कारण गिनाइए। (ii) एक 60-वर्षीय पुरुष में पुरःस्थ कार्सिनोमा के प्रबंधन का संक्षेप में वर्णन कीजिए। 5+10=15

Directive word: Describe

This question asks you to describe. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'describe' demands comprehensive, structured exposition across all five sub-parts. Allocate approximately 40% of time/words to part (a) [20 marks], 30% to part (b) [15 marks], and 30% to part (c) [15 marks]. Structure as: (a) classification with examples, control sources, and comparative advantages; (b) definition, objectives, visit schedule (WHO/ICMR pattern), and balanced analysis of domiciliary services; (c) systematic differential for hematuria and evidence-based prostate cancer management. Use tabular formats for comparisons and flowcharts where applicable.

Key points expected

  • (a)(i) Classification of epidemiological studies: observational (descriptive: case reports, cross-sectional; analytical: case-control, cohort, ecological) vs. experimental (RCT, field trials, community trials) with examples
  • (a)(ii) Sources of controls in case-control studies: hospital/non-diseased patients, general population, relatives/friends, neighborhood controls, multiple control groups
  • (a)(iii) Advantages of case-control over cohort: suitable for rare diseases, shorter duration, less expensive, smaller sample size, no attrition bias, multiple risk factors studied simultaneously
  • (b) Antenatal care definition (WHO), objectives (screening high-risk, preventing complications, health education), schedule (minimum 4 visits: 12, 26, 32, 36 weeks or more frequent), domiciliary midwifery pros/cons (accessibility/cost vs. emergency backup limitations)
  • (c)(i) Causes of hematuria in 60-year-old male: BPH, prostate carcinoma, urothelial malignancy, renal cell carcinoma, calculi, infection, glomerular disease, trauma, anticoagulation
  • (c)(ii) Prostate carcinoma management: staging (TNM), active surveillance for low-risk, radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy (EBRT/ brachytherapy), androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy (docetaxel) for metastatic, follow-up with PSA

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%10Precise epidemiological terminology (incidence vs. prevalence, relative risk vs. odds ratio); accurate ANC schedule per WHO/ICMR guidelines; correct TNM staging for prostate cancer; distinguishes case-control from cohort study design without confusionGenerally correct definitions but minor errors in study design distinctions or ANC visit timing; vague on staging criteriaFundamental confusion between study types (e.g., calling cohort prospective and case-control retrospective without nuance); incorrect ANC schedule; wrong staging system
Clinical correlation20%10Links hematuria in elderly male to malignant differentials first; contextualizes domiciliary midwifery within India's JSY/JSSK programs; cites Indian epidemiology (rising prostate cancer in urban registries); connects ANC to maternal mortality reductionMentions clinical relevance superficially; generic discussion without Indian public health context; lists differentials without prioritization by ageNo clinical application; purely theoretical answers; misses malignant causes of hematuria in elderly; ignores national health program linkages
Diagram / pathway15%7.5Flowchart for epidemiological study classification; schematic of case-control design with arrows showing temporal direction; ANC visit timeline diagram; algorithm for hematuria evaluation in elderly male; prostate cancer management decision treeOne relevant diagram (typically study classification); poorly labeled or cramped; no temporal arrows in case-control schematicNo diagrams despite clear opportunities; text-only descriptions where visual representation would aid clarity
Differential / staging25%12.5Comprehensive hematuria differential prioritized by likelihood in 60-year-old male (malignancy > benign > medical causes); accurate TNM staging for prostate cancer (T1-T4, N, M); mentions Gleason score and risk stratification (low/intermediate/high)Lists hematuria causes without age-specific prioritization; mentions staging but incomplete (e.g., only T stages); omits Gleason scoreIncomplete differentials (misses urothelial/RCC); no staging mentioned; confuses BPH with prostate cancer management
Management / public-health angle20%10Evidence-based prostate cancer management with indications for each modality; balanced critique of domiciliary midwifery referencing Indian studies (e.g., Mumbai slum projects); mentions quality ANC components (tetanus, iron, detection of PIH/anemia); discusses referral linkages for high-risk pregnanciesGeneric management without staging-based stratification; one-sided view of domiciliary care; routine ANC components listed without emphasizing high-risk detectionOutdated management (no active surveillance); no public health perspective; misses emergency obstetric care backup for domiciliary deliveries

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Medical Science 2024 Paper II