Paper I — Q7
(a) Examine the unique features of the 73rd Constitutional Amendment. Do you think this Amendment would contribute in achieving…
(a) Examine the unique features of the 73rd Constitutional Amendment. Do you think this Amendment would contribute in achieving the goal of empowerment of marginalised sections of the society? (20 marks) (b) The Speaker represents the freedom and dignity of the House. Examine. (15 marks) (c) Discuss the policy initiatives of the Fourteenth Finance Commission aimed towards promoting and strengthening agricultural development in India. (15 marks)
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a) 73वें संवैधानिक संशोधन की मुख्य विशेषताओं का परीक्षण कीजिए। क्या आप मानते हैं कि यह संशोधन समाज के वंचित वर्गों के सशक्तिकरण के उद्देश्य को प्राप्त करने में सहायक होगा? (20 अंक) (b) स्पीकर सदन की स्वतंत्रता और गरिमा का प्रतिनिधित्व करता है। परीक्षण कीजिए। (15 अंक) (c) भारत में कृषि विकास को बढ़ावा देने और मजबूत करने के उद्देश्य से चौदहवें वित्त आयोग के अन्तर्गत नीतिगत पहलों की विवेचना कीजिए। (15 अंक)
Directive word: Examine
This question asks you to examine. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.
See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
The directive 'examine' requires critical analysis with evidence-based evaluation across all three parts. Allocate approximately 40% of time/words to part (a) given its 20 marks, and 30% each to parts (b) and (c). Structure: brief introduction acknowledging the three distinct constitutional themes, then systematic treatment of each part with internal conclusions, followed by an integrated conclusion on constitutional empowerment.
Key points expected
- Part (a): Three-tier Panchayat structure (Article 243B), reservation for SC/ST (≥ proportion of population) and women (1/3), fixed 5-year term, State Election Commission, and Finance Commission provisions under Article 243I
- Part (a): Critical evaluation of empowerment—link to Article 243D (reservation), Article 243G (Gram Sabha powers), but note implementation gaps like proxy representation, elite capture, and delayed elections in some states
- Part (b): Speaker's institutional role—presiding officer maintaining order under Article 93, certification of Money Bills (Article 110), casting vote in case of equality, and discretionary powers in anti-defection cases (Kihoto Hollohan v. State of Mizoram)
- Part (b): Tension between partisan role and constitutional office—reference to historical instances (Neelam Sanjiva Reddy, G.M.C. Balayogi) and the need for impartiality in coalition era
- Part (c): 14th Finance Commission (Y.V. Reddy) specific recommendations—50% tax devolution, performance-based grants, increased allocation to gram panchayats, and sector-specific grants for agriculture including irrigation and watershed management
- Part (c): Critical assessment of agricultural focus—link to State Disaster Response Fund, local body grants, and whether fiscal decentralization actually reached farm-level infrastructure
Evaluation rubric
| Dimension | Weight | Max marks | Excellent | Average | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demand-directive understanding | 20% | 10 | Correctly interprets 'examine' in (a) and (b) as critical analysis with evidence, and 'discuss' in (c) as comprehensive evaluation; maintains analytical depth rather than descriptive listing across all three constitutional themes | Partially understands directives—treats 'examine' as description for one part, or conflates 'discuss' with mere enumeration; uneven analytical treatment across the three parts | Misinterprets directives—provides only bullet-point description for 'examine' questions, or fails to distinguish between critical analysis required in (a)-(b) versus comprehensive discussion in (c) |
| Content depth & accuracy | 20% | 10 | Demonstrates precise constitutional knowledge: cites correct Articles (243A-I for 73rd Amendment, 93/94 for Speaker, 280 for Finance Commission), names specific Finance Commission recommendations (50% devolution, performance grants), and accurately describes Speaker's discretionary powers under Tenth Schedule | Generally accurate but with gaps—mentions Panchayat tiers without Article numbers, describes Speaker's role generically without specific constitutional provisions, or confuses 14th with 13th/15th Finance Commission recommendations | Significant factual errors—wrong constitutional provisions, confuses 73rd with 74th Amendment, misidentifies Finance Commission recommendations, or provides outdated/incorrect information about Speaker's powers |
| Structure & flow | 20% | 10 | Clear tripartite structure with visible demarcation; each part has internal introduction-body-conclusion; smooth transitions between constitutional themes; integrated final conclusion connecting local governance, parliamentary democracy, and fiscal federalism | Identifiable three parts but uneven development—one part significantly longer; abrupt transitions between (a), (b), (c); missing internal conclusions for individual parts; weak or absent integrated conclusion | Poorly organized—parts merged indistinguishably, or extreme imbalance (e.g., 80% on part a); no logical progression; missing introduction or conclusion entirely; appears as disconnected notes rather than coherent answer |
| Examples / case-law / data | 20% | 10 | Rich empirical grounding: for (a) cites specific state experiences (Kerala's People's Plan Campaign, Madhya Pradesh's Gram Swaraj); for (b) references Kihoto Hollohan (1992), landmark Speaker decisions (Bommai case implications); for (c) quantifies 14th FC recommendations (₹2.87 lakh crore to local bodies, 50% vs 32% devolution) | Limited examples—generic mention of 'some states' for (a), no case law for (b), vague reference to 'increased funds' for (c) without specific figures; examples not tightly integrated with analysis | Virtually no examples or data; or irrelevant examples (using 74th Amendment data for 73rd, citing Finance Commission but not 14th specifically); fabricated case law or statistics; examples contradict the argument made |
| Conclusion & analytical edge | 20% | 10 | Synthesizes three constitutional mechanisms as complementary instruments of democratic deepening; offers nuanced critique—acknowledges 73rd Amendment's transformative potential while noting patriarchal/elite capture, Speaker's institutional vulnerability in polarized era, and fiscal decentralization's implementation gaps; suggests concrete reforms | Separate conclusions for each part without synthesis; or generic conclusion on 'strengthening democracy'; limited critical engagement—mostly restates positives without substantive critique; no forward-looking recommendations | No conclusion or extremely brief; purely descriptive ending; uncritical celebration of constitutional provisions without acknowledging implementation challenges; or cynical dismissal without recognizing genuine achievements |
Practice this exact question
Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.
Evaluate my answer →More from Political Science & IR 2022 Paper I
- Q4 (a) Dr. Ambedkar's idea of social justice leads to 'egalitarian justice' as compared to R…
- Q5 Answer the following in about 150 words each: (a) Analyse the workers' movement in India…
- Q6 (a) Electoral behaviour of voters is governed more by the social and economic factors tha…
- Q7 (a) Examine the unique features of the 73rd Constitutional Amendment. Do you think this A…
- Q8 (a) Ethnicity is the underlying cause which poses a great challenge in the resolution of…