Political Science & IR 2023 Paper II 50 marks Comment

Paper II — Q6

(a) Arms trade, economic ties and congruent geo-political interests are no longer the three pillars of India – Russia…

(a)

Arms trade, economic ties and congruent geo-political interests are no longer the three pillars of India – Russia relationship in the emerging strategic context. Comment. 20 marks

(b)

Discuss the importance of India's role in UN peacekeeping operations as a ground for its claim to a permanent seat in the UN Security Council. 15 marks

(c)

Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD) performs an important role in India's strategic balancing act to withstand the dominance of China in Asia. Discuss. 15 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a)

हथियारों का व्यापार, आर्थिक संबंध और सर्वसम भू-राजनीतिक हित अब उभरते रणनीतिक संदर्भ में भारत – रूस संबंधों के तीन स्तंभ नहीं रहे । टिप्पणी कीजिए । 20

(b)

संयुक्त राष्ट्र सुरक्षा परिषद की स्थायी सदस्यता के दावे के आधार के रूप में संयुक्त राष्ट्र शांति अभियानों में भारत की भूमिका के महत्व पर चर्चा कीजिए । 15

(c)

एशिया में चीन के प्रभुत्व का सामना करने हेतु चतुर्भुज सुरक्षा वार्ता (क्वाड) भारत के रणनीतिक संतुलन में एक महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका निभाता है । विवेचन कीजिए । 15

Q6 of the 2023 UPSC Mains Political Science & IR Paper II, as printed
The question as printed in the 2023 Political Science & IR paper

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

India’s contemporary foreign policy operates in an era of geopolitical flux, requiring a recalibration of historic partnerships, assertive claims in global governance, and nimble maritime alignments.

Transforming Pillars of India–Russia Relations

The proposition that arms trade, economic ties, and congruent geopolitical interests no longer anchor Indo-Russian ties is largely accurate, as structural shifts have compelled the bilateral architecture to evolve.

Historically, defense acquisitions formed the core of the relationship. However, India’s deliberate diversification toward suppliers like France, the United States, and Israel, combined with risks from Western sanctions under CAATSA, has reduced reliance on Moscow: SIPRI data show Russia's share of India's arms imports falling from about three-quarters in 2009-13 to about a third in 2019-23. Geopolitically, the deepening Russia-China axis post-Ukraine war sharply contrasts with India's principal security challenge along the Line of Actual Control. Furthermore, bilateral trade was historically narrow and stagnant, lacking private sector integration; its jump to over $60 billion after 2022 is almost entirely Indian purchases of Russian oil, leaving a huge Indian deficit and payment problems rather than a broad economic base.

Nevertheless, the relationship has not dissolved; it has pivoted to new functional pillars. Energy cooperation has surged, exemplified by discounted hydrocarbon imports that made Russia India's largest crude supplier, and Rosneft’s 49 per cent stake in Nayara Energy - though Western sanctions, including EU measures against Nayara in 2025 and US sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil, now complicate it. Civil nuclear collaboration remains robust, visible in the continued construction of Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant Units 5 and 6. Geostrategically, both nations explore cooperation on the Northern Sea Route, Arctic energy and the Chennai-Vladivostok maritime corridor, share concerns over instability in Afghanistan, and value each other as a hedge - India against an unbalanced dependence on the West, Russia against total dependence on China. Thus, while the classical pillars have fractured, the partnership has reconstituted itself around energy pragmatism and Eurasian connectivity.

UN Peacekeeping as India’s Claim to UNSC Permanent Seat

India’s extensive contribution to United Nations Peacekeeping Operations (UNPKOs) constitutes an undeniable normative and material basis for its permanent seat on the UN Security Council (UNSC).

Quantitatively, India is the largest cumulative troop contributor, having deployed more than 2.9 lakh personnel across over 50 missions since the 1950s. It keeps around 5,000-6,000 personnel deployed in volatile regions, and about 180 Indian peacekeepers have made the supreme sacrifice - more than from any other country.

Qualitatively, India has shaped international peacebuilding norms. It has contributed to disarmament, demobilization and reintegration work, set up the Centre for UN Peacekeeping in New Delhi for training, and created a precedent for gender-inclusive peacekeeping by deploying the UN’s first all-female Formed Police Unit (FPU) to Liberia in 2007. This substantive contribution to global public goods under Chapter VII mandates exposes the democratic deficit of the UNSC. Leveraging this operational legitimacy, India leads calls for text-based negotiations through the G4 grouping and the UN Summit of the Future, arguing that financial contributions alone cannot outweigh sustained, life-risking commitments to international peace and security.

QUAD and India's Strategic Balancing

The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD) is an indispensable plurilateral instrument in India’s external balancing strategy against Chinese assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific.

QUAD enhances India’s defense preparedness and maritime situational awareness through institutionalized initiatives like the Indo-Pacific Maritime Domain Awareness (IPMDA) project, which tracks dark shipping and maritime militia. Interoperability among the four navies is continually tested via the advanced Malabar exercises. Simultaneously, QUAD allows India to project soft power and regional leadership through public goods delivery, including the Quad Vaccine Partnership, critical technology standards, and climate resilience frameworks.

However, India exercises strategic nuance by explicitly rejecting any portrayal of the QUAD as an "Asian NATO" or a formal military alliance. Guided by strategic autonomy, New Delhi balances its maritime commitments in the QUAD with active participation in continental Eurasian bodies such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) and BRICS. This dual-track approach prevents binary bloc alignment while maintaining effective deterrence against unilateral hegemony in Asia.

India’s foreign policy reflects an agile multi-alignment doctrine: modernizing its historic ties with Russia around energy and connectivity, converting its peacekeeping sacrifices into reformist diplomacy at the UN, and utilizing the QUAD to deter regional asymmetry while safeguarding its strategic independence.

How this answer will be evaluated

What earns full marks: Demonstrates deep understanding of IR theory and current affairs; nuanced, balanced, and well-structured.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) Assess the validity of the claim that traditional pillars of India-Russia relations have shifted. 20 marks

    comment— context → arguments both sides → judgment → close

    Must cover

    • The historical 'three pillars' in context: 1971 Treaty of Peace and Friendship, Soviet arms, the 2000 Strategic Partnership and the 2010 'Special and Privileged' partnership
    • Impact of the Ukraine conflict on the arms pillar: Russia's share of Indian arms imports has fallen to about one-third (SIPRI 2019-23), diversification, supply delays, S-400 (2018 deal) deliveries
    • Shift in geopolitical interests: Russia's tilt to China, the China-Russia 'no limits' partnership, India's deepening ties with the Quad and the US; India's neutral stance
    • Balanced judgment: relationship sustained by discounted oil imports, rupee-rouble trade, nuclear (Kudankulam) and space cooperation; pillars have shifted but not vanished; Russia's distinct role in multi-alignment

    Loses marks

    • Treating the relationship as static or purely historical.
    • Ignoring the specific 'emerging strategic context' mentioned in the prompt.
    • One-sided analysis without acknowledging the continued importance of some pillars.

    Earns more

    • Recent developments: S-400, oil imports
    • The concept of 'strategic autonomy' in Indian foreign policy
    • India's 'multi-alignment' strategy
    • Resilience of economic ties despite geopolitical divergence

    Extra mark

    • Bilateral trade above US$60 billion, target of US$100 billion by 2030
    • A specific joint statement or summit outcome
  2. (b) Link India's UN peacekeeping record to its claim for a permanent Security Council seat. 15 marks

    discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close

    Must cover

    • India's record: from Korea in the 1950s (Custodian Force) to 50+ missions, 290,000+ personnel, the highest fatalities (180+); among the top troop contributors
    • Linking peacekeeping to 'global responsibility' and 'representation': Charter Art 23 - contribution to peace as a criterion; Global South representation; the consultation gap between troop contributors and the Security Council (Resolution 1353)
    • G4 (India, Brazil, Germany, Japan) and the L.69 group, Intergovernmental Negotiations (IGN), P5 veto and obstacles to reform
    • Evaluation: gap between operational contribution and political power; those who bear the burden should share in decisions

    Loses marks

    • Listing peacekeeping stats without linking them to the 'permanent seat' claim.
    • Ignoring the political obstacles (e.g., P5 veto) to the claim.
    • Failing to distinguish between 'peacekeeping' and 'peace enforcement'.

    Earns more

    • Missions: UNIFIL (Lebanon), MONUSCO (DR Congo), UNMISS (South Sudan), UNDOF
    • Women peacekeepers: first all-female formed police unit in Liberia (2007)
    • R2P and protection-of-civilians mandates; Kigali Principles
    • Global South leadership; Uniting for Peace (GA Res 377)

    Extra mark

    • Peacekeeper fatalities (180+) and history of service
    • Charter Art 23 criterion: contribution to international peace and security
  3. (c) Analyze QUAD's role in India's strategy to counterbalance China in Asia. 15 marks

    discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close

    Must cover

    • Quad: US, India, Japan, Australia; origin in 2004 tsunami relief, the 2007 Abe-inspired dialogue, dormancy, revival in November 2017, leaders' level since March 2021 (virtual) and in person in Washington in September 2021
    • Balancing: concern over Chinese assertiveness (2020 LAC, South China Sea, String of Pearls/BRI); Free and Open Indo-Pacific; maritime domain awareness (IPMDA 2022), Malabar exercise, supply-chain resilience
    • Broader agenda: vaccines (Quad Vaccine Partnership 2021), critical technologies, climate, infrastructure, HADR, cyber
    • Limits: not a treaty alliance, no collective defence; differing threat perceptions; India's strategic autonomy (RIC, BRICS, SCO); US reliability; trade dependence on China

    Loses marks

    • Portraying QUAD as a formal military alliance (it is not).
    • Ignoring the non-security dimensions (climate, health, tech) of QUAD.
    • Failing to address the 'strategic balancing' aspect specifically.

    Earns more

    • Malabar; Quad maritime security
    • Act East and the Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative (IPOI 2019)
    • Strategic autonomy: India in SCO, BRICS, RIC alongside the Quad
    • Quad Plus (2020 consultations with South Korea, New Zealand, Vietnam)

    Extra mark

    • 2021 Quad leaders' joint statement: 'The Spirit of the Quad'
    • Malabar exercise (Australia joined in 2020)
What "Comment" is asking you to do

Take a position on the statement and support it. Comment usually attaches to a quoted line in the short slots, so the reasoning must be compressed — an opening view, a few load-bearing reasons, and the limit of the claim.

Structure that answers it

Unpack what the statement asserts → your stance → two or three supporting reasons → the qualification that limits it

Where marks are lost

Neutral summary; a comment without a stance has not answered. Equally costly is accepting the quoted line wholesale and never testing where it fails.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Political Science & IR 2023 Paper II

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in