(a) Discuss the major recent social movements related to the physical rights of women in various countries of the world. (20 marks)

(b) Critically examine the role of political parties in sustaining and stabilising democracies in the developing soci

Question

(a) Discuss the major recent social movements related to the physical rights of women in various countries of the world. (20 marks)

(b) Critically examine the role of political parties in sustaining and stabilising democracies in the developing societies. (15 marks)

(c) Do you agree with the view that the USA uses NATO as a traditional tool of strategy to perpetuate its hegemony in the world ? (15 marks)

UPSC Answer Check · Accepted Answer

The directive 'discuss' for part (a) requires a comprehensive treatment with multiple perspectives, while 'critically examine' for (b) and (c) demands balanced evaluation with arguments for and against. Allocate approximately 40% of time/words to part (a) given its 20 marks, and roughly 30% each to parts (b) and (c). Structure with a brief composite introduction, three distinct sections addressing each sub-part with clear sub-headings, and a synthesizing conclusion that connects themes of power, rights, and international order.
- Part (a): Analysis of #MeToo movement (USA/global), anti-FGM campaigns in Africa/Middle East, reproductive rights movements (Argentina's green wave, Poland's abortion protests, USA's Dobbs aftermath), and India's anti-rape protests (Nirbhaya 2012, Hathras 2020) with focus on physical autonomy and bodily integrity
- Part (a): Distinction between 'physical rights' versus broader gender equality; specific focus on bodily integrity, sexual violence, reproductive health, and harmful traditional practices
- Part (b): Critical examination of political parties' stabilizing functions—interest aggregation, legitimacy provision, peaceful alternation of power—versus destabilizing tendencies—patronage politics, ethnic mobilization, weak institutionalization in developing societies
- Part (b): Comparative analysis across developing regions: India's competitive federalism, Africa's dominant-party systems, Latin America's party system volatility, and the role of catch-all vs. ethnic parties
- Part (c): Evaluation of NATO as US hegemonic tool through institutional dominance (Supreme Allied Commander always American), burden-sharing asymmetries, out-of-area operations (Kosovo 1999, Afghanistan 2001, Libya 2011), and post-Cold War expansion
- Part (c): Counter-arguments—European strategic autonomy initiatives, Franco-German resistance (Iraq War 2003), NATO's collective defense legitimacy under Article 5, and the agency of smaller members

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Demand-directive understanding	20%	10	Demonstrates precise understanding that 'discuss' for (a) requires multi-dimensional exploration of women's physical rights movements, while 'critically examine' for (b) and (c) demands balanced thesis-antithesis-synthesis evaluation; maintains appropriate analytical registers across all three parts without conflating descriptive and critical modes	Shows basic comprehension of directives but tends toward description in (b) and (c) where critical evaluation is required; may treat all three parts with similar analytical weight without adjusting to 'critically examine'	Misinterprets directives—provides purely descriptive narrative for (a) without discussion, or offers one-sided advocacy rather than critical examination for (b) and (c); confuses 'discuss' with 'enumerate'
Content depth & accuracy	20%	10	Displays substantive command across all three domains: for (a) distinguishes physical rights from broader gender equality with theoretical grounding (Nussbaum's capabilities, Butler's performativity); for (b) engages with Huntington, Mainwaring, or Diamond on parties and democracy; for (c) references Mearsheimer's offensive realism, Ikenberry's institutionalism, or NATO's strategic concepts	Covers basic factual terrain adequately but lacks theoretical framing; may conflate physical rights with general women's rights in (a), or present parties/NATO in institutional description without analytical depth	Significant factual errors or omissions; confuses NATO with UN or EU functions; misidentifies movement goals (e.g., treating wage equality as physical right); relies on outdated examples without contemporary relevance
Structure & flow	20%	10	Employs clear tripartite structure with explicit sub-headings for (a), (b), (c); maintains internal coherence within each part—(a) organized thematically (bodily integrity, reproductive rights, sexual violence) or geographically; (b) and (c) follow problem-evidence-evaluation format; smooth transitions between parts showing thematic connections	Basic structure present but uneven—may merge parts or lack clear demarcation; some logical flow within sections but abrupt transitions between (a), (b), and (c) without connecting tissue	Disorganized or fragmented response; no clear part separation; stream-of-consciousness writing without paragraphing; disproportionate allocation (e.g., 80% on (a), minimal treatment of (b) and (c))
Examples / case-law / data	20%	10	Rich empirical grounding: for (a) cites specific campaigns (Argentina's Marea Verde 2018, India's Pinjra Tod, Nigeria's #EndFGM), legal milestones (India's Criminal Law Amendment 2013, Spain's 'Only Yes Means Yes' law 2022); for (b) references specific party systems (India's BJP-Congress, Mexico's PRI, South Africa's ANC); for (c) cites NATO operations, spending data (2% GDP target), and enlargement rounds with dates	Some relevant examples but limited specificity—mentions 'MeToo' without national variations, 'political parties in India' without naming specific institutional features, 'NATO wars' without operational details; generic rather than precise	Sparse or inaccurate examples; relies on vague references ('some African countries,' 'recent wars'); no contemporary instances post-2015; confuses movements (e.g., Black Lives Matter as women's physical rights movement)
Conclusion & analytical edge	20%	10	Synthesizes three parts into coherent argument about power and rights in global politics—connecting women's bodily autonomy struggles, democratic institutionalization challenges, and hegemonic international order; offers original insight on how transnational movements may challenge state-centric (b) and great-power (c) frameworks; qualifies initial position with nuance	Summarizes main points without genuine synthesis; restates arguments from each part separately; conclusion reads as afterthought rather than analytical culmination; no explicit connection between sub-parts	Absent or perfunctory conclusion; introduces entirely new material in conclusion; makes unsupported normative claims ('NATO is good,' 'parties are essential') without analytical justification; no engagement with question's underlying tensions

(a) Discuss the major recent social movements related to the physical rights of women in various countries of the world. (20…

Directive word: Discuss

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Key points expected

Evaluation rubric

Practice this exact question

More from Political Science & IR 2024 Paper II