Psychology 2023 Paper II 50 marks Design

Paper II — Q7

(a) Discuss the psychological and social effects of pornography addiction. (15 marks) (b) Discuss the strategies for promoting…

(a)

Discuss the psychological and social effects of pornography addiction. 15 marks

(b)

Discuss the strategies for promoting positive mental health among defence personnel. 15 marks

(c)

What is pro-environmental behaviour? Design an intervention plan for developing pro-environmental behaviour among schoolchildren. 20 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a)

पॉर्नोग्राफी की लत के मनोवैज्ञानिक तथा सामाजिक प्रभावों की विवेचना कीजिए। (15 अंक)

(b)

सुरक्षा कर्मियों में सकारात्मक मानसिक स्वास्थ्य बढ़ाने हेतु रणनीतियों की चर्चा कीजिए। (15 अंक)

(c)

पर्यावरण-अनुकूल व्यवहार क्या है? स्कूली बच्चों में पर्यावरण-अनुकूल व्यवहार को विकसित करने के लिए एक हस्तक्षेप योजना तैयार कीजिए। (20 अंक)

Q7 of the 2023 UPSC Mains Psychology Paper II, as printed
The question as printed in the 2023 Psychology paper

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

(a) Psychological and social effects of pornography addiction

Pornography addiction is not a diagnosis in DSM-5. ICD-11 lists compulsive sexual behaviour disorder, which fits only when use is persistent, out of control and impairing. Frequent use alone is not addiction. One proposed mechanism is dopamine-based reward sensitisation leading to craving and tolerance, but this evidence is contested. Psychological effects: shame, guilt, anxiety, depression, low self-esteem, loneliness, poor sleep and falling academic or work performance. Grubbs describes "moral incongruence", where distress arises from a conflict between use and personal values. Unrealistic sexual scripts and body-image dissatisfaction are reported, along with sexual dissatisfaction in some users. Co-occurring depression, ADHD, impulsivity and substance use are common. Social effects: a meta-analysis (Wright and colleagues, 2017) found that consumption is linked with lower relationship satisfaction; secrecy erodes trust and intimacy and can lead to conflict. Objectification of partners and, for some users, spending or legal trouble follow. Evidence on aggression is mixed and depends on content and prior traits. Legal exposure arises under the IT Act, 2000 (Sections 67, 67A, 67B) and the POCSO Act, 2012 for child material. Response: CBT, relapse prevention and motivational interviewing; NIMHANS's SHUT clinic treats problematic technology use; prevention needs sex education, digital literacy and parental guidance rather than moral labelling.

(b) Strategies for promoting positive mental health among defence personnel

Defence personnel face combat and operational stress, separation from family, hierarchy, frequent postings, sleep loss and stigma. Hoge and colleagues (2004) found that stigma was a major barrier to seeking help among deployed soldiers. Strategies work across prevention levels. Primary: mental health literacy and anti-stigma leadership; resilience and stress-inoculation training (Meichenbaum), as in the US Comprehensive Soldier Fitness programme (Seligman, 2009); relaxation, yoga, sleep hygiene, sport and unit cohesion; buddy support. Secondary: periodic screening for PTSD, depression, alcohol misuse and suicidality; confidential counselling by unit psychologists and psychiatrists; early support after stressful events; decompression after deployment. Tertiary: trauma-focused CBT, medication, rehabilitation and reintegration support, including vocational and financial counselling. Organisational: humane duty rosters, assured leave, grievance redress, zero tolerance for bullying, and commanders who model help-seeking. Family: welfare associations such as AWWA and counselling for spouses and children reduce separation stress. Indian base: the DRDO's Defence Institute of Psychological Research studies stress and builds psychological tools for the services. Evaluation by indicators such as help-seeking, suicide and fratricide trends and stigma surveys keeps programmes accountable.

(c)(i) Pro-environmental behaviour

Pro-environmental behaviour is behaviour that consciously seeks to reduce harm to the environment or benefit it, such as saving energy and water, segregating waste, recycling, reducing plastic, planting trees and supporting green policy. Its determinants include values, awareness of consequences and personal norms (Schwartz's Norm Activation Model; Stern's Value-Belief-Norm theory), attitudes, social norms and perceived control (Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behaviour), habits and facilities. Knowledge alone does not change behaviour; Kollmuss and Agyeman (2002) describe this knowledge-behaviour gap.

(c)(ii) Intervention plan for schoolchildren

Step 1: Needs assessment. A baseline survey of knowledge, attitudes and behaviours, and a school audit of waste, energy and water. Step 2: Objectives. Raise awareness, personal norms and self-efficacy, and achieve measurable behaviour change in six months among classes VI to X. Step 3: Theory base. Bandura's social learning for modelling and reinforcement, TPB for norms and control, and nudges such as colour-coded bins. Step 4: Components. Classroom: stories, experiments and debates, building on the compulsory environmental education directed by the Supreme Court in 2003. Experiential: kitchen garden, composting, energy monitors and clean-up drives through eco-clubs (National Green Corps). Behavioural: goal setting, implementation intentions, weekly pledges and self-monitoring diaries. Social: teacher and parent modelling, badges and class competitions. Community: parent workshops and local NGO partnerships, aligned with Mission LiFE (2022). Step 5: Implementation. Fit into the timetable with monthly themes, trained teacher-coordinators and visible facilities. Step 6: Evaluation. A pre-post design with a comparison school; knowledge-attitude scale, behaviour checklist, observed behaviour and waste and energy audit; follow-up at three and six months; process check on attendance and fidelity. Ethics: voluntary, non-shaming and inclusive of children from all backgrounds.

How this answer will be evaluated

Framework: Define > Theory or model > Evidence > Application

What earns full marks: Precise definitions, named theories (TPB, Dopamine), specific Indian context, structured plan with evaluation.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) Discuss the psychological and social effects of pornography addiction in a balanced, non-moralising way. 15 marks

    discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close

    Must cover

    • Not a DSM-5 diagnosis; ICD-11 compulsive sexual behaviour disorder; frequent use is not addiction
    • Psychological effects: shame, anxiety, depression, moral incongruence, unrealistic scripts
    • Social effects: lower relationship satisfaction (Wright 2017 meta-analysis), secrecy, legal risk (IT Act 67, POCSO)
    • Response: CBT/relapse prevention, sex education, digital literacy

    Loses marks

    • Moralising tone; asserting addiction as settled diagnosis.

    Earns more

    • Accurate diagnostic status, effects with evidence, mixed evidence acknowledged, and a non-moral response.

    Extra mark

    • Dopamine mechanism flagged as contested; NIMHANS SHUT clinic.
  2. (b) Discuss strategies for promoting positive mental health among defence personnel across prevention levels. 15 marks

    discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close

    Must cover

    • Stressors and stigma as barrier (Hoge 2004)
    • Primary: resilience and stress-inoculation training, fitness, unit cohesion, buddy support
    • Secondary and tertiary: screening, confidential counselling, trauma-focused CBT, reintegration
    • Organisational and family measures; DIPR; evaluation

    Loses marks

    • Listing without levels or evidence.

    Earns more

    • Prevention-level strategies with evidence, family and organisational support and evaluation.

    Extra mark

    • Comprehensive Soldier Fitness (Seligman 2009).
  3. (c) Define pro-environmental behaviour and design an intervention plan for schoolchildren with evaluation. 20 marks

    derive— given → assumptions → stepwise derivation → result → check

    Must cover

    • Definition with examples; determinants: NAM, VBN, TPB; knowledge-behaviour gap (Kollmuss and Agyeman 2002)
    • Needs assessment, objectives and theory base
    • Components: classroom, experiential (eco-clubs, NGC), behavioural, social, community; Mission LiFE
    • Evaluation: pre-post with comparison school, follow-up, process check; ethics

    Loses marks

    • Plan without evaluation; knowledge-only approach.

    Earns more

    • Definition with determinants, then a staged plan with evaluation and ethics.

    Extra mark

    • Supreme Court 2003 order on environmental education.
What "Design" is asking you to do

Produce a specification that meets the given brief and demonstrate that it does. In civil and electrical papers the design is incomplete until it is expressed in buildable numbers — diameter, spacing, section, component value — and checked back against every limit stated.

Structure that answers it

Requirements and permissible values listed → code clause or design basis adopted → proportioning calculations → the specification in final dimensions → check against each requirement → sketch

Where marks are lost

Stopping at a required area or a required value without converting it into the bar size, spacing or component actually provided. The provided-against-required comparison and the serviceability or stability check are separately marked and routinely left out.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Psychology 2023 Paper II

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in