Paper I — Q1
(a) What makes psychology a science? Discuss. (10 marks) (b) Citing relevant examples, explain independent, dependent and…
Answer the following questions in about 150 words each: What makes psychology a science? Discuss. 10 marks
Citing relevant examples, explain independent, dependent and mediating variables. 10 marks
Describe data collection methods in psychology with special reference to observation and survey methods. 10 marks
Differentiate between growth and development. Explain the principles of life span development in the context of developmental ecology. 10 marks
How do the principles of classical conditioning help in the formation of likes and preferences? Discuss. 10 marks
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
निम्नलिखित प्रत्येक प्रश्न का उत्तर लगभग 150 शब्दों में दीजिए : मनोविज्ञान को विज्ञान क्या बनाता है? विवेचना कीजिए। (10 अंक)
प्रासंगिक उदाहरणों का उल्लेख करते हुए स्वतंत्र, आश्रित और मध्यस्थताकारी चरों की व्याख्या कीजिए। (10 अंक)
अवलोकन और सर्वेक्षण विधियों के विशेष संदर्भ में मनोविज्ञान में प्रदत्त (डेटा) संग्रह की विधियों का वर्णन कीजिए। (10 अंक)
वृद्धि और विकास के बीच अंतर कीजिए। विकास की पारिस्थितिकी के संदर्भ में जीवन-पर्यंत विकास के सिद्धांतों की व्याख्या कीजिए। (10 अंक)
पसंद और प्राथमिकताओं के निर्माण में प्राचीन अनुबंधन के सिद्धांत किस प्रकार सहायता करते हैं? विवेचना कीजिए। (10 अंक)
Model answer
Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the 150-word length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.
(a) Psychology as a science
Psychology is a science because it studies behaviour and mental processes through systematic empiricism: observations are planned, recorded, and subjected to controlled or comparative analysis. It formulates concepts, constructs theories, and derives hypotheses that can be tested, revised, or rejected; falsifiability, in Popper’s sense, is an important criterion, though not every qualitative or clinical formulation is strictly falsifiable. Replicability, measurement, and cumulative theory-building distinguish it from pseudoscience, which relies on vague claims and immune-to-failure authority. Its methodological pluralism—quantitative experiments, qualitative interviews, neuroimaging, and field studies—allows it to address both general laws and individual meaning. For example, an Indian study on exam stress can operationalise stress, measure cortisol or self-report, and test whether an intervention reduces anxiety, making the claim empirically accountable.
(b) Variables
In research, the independent variable is the cause or condition manipulated or selected by the researcher; the dependent variable is the outcome measured; the mediating variable is the intervening mechanism that explains how the independent variable affects the dependent variable. For instance, in an Indian classroom experiment, the independent variable may be exam pressure created by a timed, high-stakes test; the dependent variable may be academic performance measured by marks or working-memory task scores. A mediator could be threat appraisal: pressure increases the perception of threat, which raises test anxiety and narrows attention, thereby lowering performance. This differs from moderation, where a third variable changes the strength of the relation. Operational clarity is essential: if pressure is manipulated, anxiety is measured, and performance is scored, the causal chain can be tested.
(c) Data collection
Psychology uses several data-collection methods. Experiments establish causality by manipulating an independent variable and controlling extraneous factors; case studies give in-depth description of rare or complex cases; psychological tests assess abilities, traits, or disorders; archival research uses existing records such as school registers or hospital data. Observation is especially important: structured observation uses predefined categories and time or event sampling, such as counting aggressive acts in a Delhi schoolyard; unstructured observation records open-ended behaviour, useful in exploratory studies. Participant observation involves joining the setting, while non-participant observation maintains distance. Survey methods collect self-report data through questionnaires, interviews, and standardised scales. They are economical and can reach large Indian populations, but are limited by social desirability, recall bias, and language validity. Ethical care—consent, anonymity, and cultural sensitivity—is required in all methods.
(d) Growth and development
Growth refers mainly to quantitative biological changes—height, weight, brain size—whereas development is broader, including quantitative and qualitative changes in cognition, emotion, language, and social competence. Growth is thus a subset of development, not its opposite; it is more specific and biological, while development is holistic and person-level. Baltes’ life-span principles include multidimensionality (physical, cognitive, socio-emotional), multidirectionality (gains and losses across life), plasticity (change remains possible), contextualism (shaped by environment), multiple causality, and interdisciplinary explanation. Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems clarify this: the microsystem includes family and school; the mesosystem links home and school; the exosystem includes parents’ workplaces and policies; the macrosystem includes caste, gender, religion, and national culture; the chronosystem includes historical change. In India, a child’s development is affected by joint-family support, school quality, urban migration, and digital access.
(e) Classical conditioning
Classical conditioning helps form likes and preferences through repeated association. A neutral stimulus (NS), such as a particular brand jingle, is paired with an unconditioned stimulus (US), such as a pleasant taste or social approval, that naturally produces liking. After acquisition, the NS becomes a conditioned stimulus (CS) and can elicit a conditioned response of preference. Generalisation extends liking to similar stimuli, such as other products with similar colours or music. Higher-order conditioning allows a new stimulus, such as a celebrity image, to acquire liking because it is paired with an already liked CS. Extinction weakens the preference if the CS is repeatedly presented without the US. In Indian consumer life, repeated pairing of a food with festive family gatherings can create lasting taste preferences, while advertising uses these principles to shape aesthetic and brand tastes. The same logic can create dislikes, as a child bitten by a dog may generalise fear to all furry animals.
How this answer will be evaluated
Framework: null
What earns full marks: Precise definitions, named examples, clear distinctions, methodological awareness, and balanced discussion across all parts.
Evaluation rubric
Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.
- (a) (a) What makes psychology a science? Discuss. (150 words, 10 marks) 10 marks · 150 words
discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close
Must cover
- Systematic empiricism: planned observation and measurement of behaviour and mental processes
- Hypothesis testing, falsifiability (Popper), replicability and peer review
- Operational definitions, control, and theory building distinguishing it from pseudoscience
- Methodological pluralism and limits (replication crisis, subjectivity of some constructs)
Loses marks
- Defining psychology only as 'study of mind' without scientific criteria
Earns more
- A concrete example of a testable psychological claim
Extra mark
- Kuhn's paradigm view or the replication crisis as a sign of self-correction
- (b) (b) Citing relevant examples, explain independent, dependent and mediating variables. (150 words, 10 marks) 10 marks · 150 words
explain— definition/context → points in order → small example → short close
Must cover
- Independent variable: manipulated or selected cause, with example
- Dependent variable: measured outcome, with example
- Mediating variable: mechanism through which IV affects DV, with example
- Distinguish mediator from moderator; Baron and Kenny (1986) logic of testing mediation
Loses marks
- Confusing mediator with moderator or extraneous variable
Earns more
- Operational definition of each variable in the example
Extra mark
- A simple IV → M → DV path diagram
- (c) (c) Describe data collection methods in psychology with special reference to observation and survey methods. (150 words, 10 marks) 10 marks · 150 words
describe— define → structure or process in order → labelled diagram → significance
Must cover
- Overview: experiment, case study, tests, interviews, archival data
- Observation: naturalistic vs laboratory, participant vs non-participant, structured vs unstructured, time/event sampling
- Survey: questionnaires, interviews, sampling, reach and economy
- Limitations: observer bias, reactivity, social desirability, recall bias; ethics
Loses marks
- Listing methods without the required focus on observation and survey
Earns more
- Indian examples of observation or surveys (e.g. classroom studies, NFHS-type surveys)
Extra mark
- Inter-observer reliability as a quality check
- (d) (d) Differentiate between growth and development. Explain the principles of life span development in the context of developmental ecology. (150 words, 10 marks) 10 marks · 150 words
explain— definition/context → points in order → small example → short close
Must cover
- Growth: quantitative, physical change; development: quantitative and qualitative, holistic change
- Baltes' life-span principles: lifelong, multidimensional, multidirectional, plastic, contextual, multidisciplinary
- Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems: micro, meso, exo, macro and chronosystem
- Application to Indian context (family, school, caste, gender, digital change)
Loses marks
- Treating growth and development as synonyms
Earns more
- Growth as a subset of development
Extra mark
- Bioecological model: process–person–context–time
- (e) (e) How do the principles of classical conditioning help in the formation of likes and preferences? Discuss. (150 words, 10 marks) 10 marks · 150 words
discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close
Must cover
- Pavlovian mechanism: NS paired with US becomes CS producing a CR
- Evaluative conditioning of likes: pairing products with pleasant stimuli, e.g. advertising
- Generalisation, discrimination, higher-order conditioning and extinction applied to preferences
- Conditioned dislikes/aversions (Watson's Little Albert, taste aversion)
Loses marks
- Explaining operant conditioning instead of classical
Earns more
- Mere-exposure contrast or role of cognition (Rescorla's contingency)
Extra mark
- Garcia effect showing biological preparedness
What "Discuss" is asking you to do
Lay the issue out from more than one side — how it arose, what is claimed for it, what is held against it, and where it now stands. UPSC attaches discuss to broad topics with several live dimensions, so coverage of the dimensions earns more than the strength of your opinion.
Structure that answers it
Set the issue up → the case as it is made → the case against → the dimension both sides leave out → where the balance now lies
Where marks are lost
Listing facts with no thread between them, or arguing one side throughout and calling it a discussion.
Practice this exact question
Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.
Evaluate my answer →More from Psychology 2024 Paper I
- Q1 Answer the following questions in about 150 words each: (a) What makes psychology a scien…
- Q2 (a) Describe the diversity in the disciplinary thoughts with special reference to structu…
- Q3 (a) Discuss the signal detection theory (SDT) with reference to perceptual vigilance task…
- Q4 (a) Differentiate between classical and operant conditioning. Discuss their applications…