Q5
Answer the following in about 150 words each: (a) The approach to the study of administration in its environmental context is especially more useful for developing countries. Comment. (10 marks) (b) Gender equality and women's rights have laid down a strong foundation of development. Elaborate. (10 marks) (c) Performance appraisal needs to be seen beyond the mere suitability of the official for vertical promotion. Explain. (10 marks) (d) It is widely agreed that the government ought to provide the goods that market fails to provide or does not provide efficiently. Argue. (10 marks) (e) MIS has evolved and gone far beyond its traditional advantages due to technological advancements. Comment. (10 marks)
हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
निम्नलिखित में से प्रत्येक का लगभग 150 शब्दों में उत्तर दीजिए : (a) पर्यावरण के संदर्भ में प्रशासन के अध्ययन का दृष्टिकोण विकासशील देशों के लिए विशेष रूप से अधिक उपयोगी है। टिप्पणी कीजिए। (10 अंक) (b) लैंगिक समानता और महिलाओं के अधिकारों ने विकास की एक सुदृढ़ नींव रखी है। विस्तारपूर्वक विवेचना कीजिए। (10 अंक) (c) निष्पादन-प्रदर्शन मूल्यांकन को केवल लम्बवत पदोन्नति के लिए अधिकारी की उपयुक्तता से परे देखा जाना चाहिए। व्याख्या कीजिए। (10 अंक) (d) इस आशय पर व्यापक सहमति है कि सरकार को उन वस्तुओं को उपलब्ध कराना चाहिए जिसे बाजार प्रदान करने में विफल रहता है या कुशलता से प्रदान नहीं करता है। तर्क दीजिए। (10 अंक) (e) तकनीकी प्रगति के कारण एम० आई० एस० विकसित हुआ और अपने पारंपरिक लाभों से बहुत आगे निकल गया है। समीक्षा कीजिए। (10 अंक)
Directive word: Comment
This question asks you to comment. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.
See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.
How this answer will be evaluated
Approach
This multi-part question requires balanced treatment across five 10-mark sub-parts with ~150 words each. For (a) 'comment' on ecological approach, (b) 'elaborate' on gender-development link, (c) 'explain' performance appraisal beyond promotion, (d) 'argue' for government provision of public goods, and (e) 'comment' on MIS evolution. Allocate approximately 25-30 words per sub-part for introduction, 100-110 words for analytical body addressing the specific directive, and 15-20 words for conclusion. Prioritize conceptual clarity and contemporary examples over exhaustive coverage.
Key points expected
- (a) Ecological approach: Riggs' Fused-Prismatic-Diffracted model; developing countries' administrative lag due to environmental factors like heterogeneity, overlapping, and formalism; contrast with developed nations' stable ecology
- (b) Gender-development nexus: Amartya Sen's 'missing women', capability approach; SDG-5 linkage with SDG-1, 4, 8; women's economic participation as development multiplier; Beti Bachao Beti Padhao, SHG-Bank linkage
- (c) Performance appraisal beyond promotion: 360-degree feedback, potential appraisal, career planning, training needs identification; ACR to PAR shift; behavioural competencies assessment
- (d) Market failure: Public goods (non-excludable, non-rivalrous), externalities, information asymmetry; Samuelson-Musgrave theory; government's role in merit goods, common pool resources
- (e) MIS evolution: From transaction processing to decision support systems, AI/ML integration, big data analytics, e-governance platforms; Digital India, UMANG, integrated MIS for welfare delivery
Evaluation rubric
| Dimension | Weight | Max marks | Excellent | Average | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concept correctness | 20% | 10 | Precisely defines ecological approach, distinguishes public/merit/common goods, identifies 360-degree appraisal components, and traces MIS evolution accurately; no conflation of terms across sub-parts | Basic definitions correct but some conceptual blurring; may confuse ecological approach with systems theory or treat all market failures identically | Fundamental errors like treating ecological approach as environmental management, confusing performance appraisal with performance budgeting, or equating MIS with IT hardware |
| Theoretical anchor | 20% | 10 | Cites Riggs' prismatic model for (a), Sen/Nussbaum capability approach for (b), Musgrave/Samuelson public goods theory for (d); references modern appraisal theories (Campbell, Latham) for (c) | Mentions theorists without elaborating their specific contributions; generic reference to 'economists' or 'administrative thinkers' | No theoretical grounding; relies entirely on commonsense assertions or misattributes theories (e.g., attributing ecological approach to Wilson or Weber) |
| Indian administrative examples | 20% | 10 | For (a): cites Indian administrative dysfunctions (red tape, corruption) as prismatic traits; (b): SHG-Bank linkage, maternity benefits; (c): PAR reforms, SPARROW; (d): Swachh Bharat, public health; (e): PM-KISAN, Aadhaar-linked MIS | Generic references to 'government schemes' without specificity; dated examples pre-2010 | No Indian examples or irrelevant foreign illustrations; treats question as purely theoretical exercise |
| Reform / policy angle | 20% | 10 | For (a): administrative reforms responsive to environmental complexity; (b): gender-responsive budgeting, women's reservation; (c): competency-based frameworks, PAR 2.0; (d): public-private partnerships, regulatory state; (e): NICNET, data-driven governance, AI integration | Mentions reforms without analytical depth; lists rather than evaluates policy shifts | No reform perspective; static description ignoring contemporary changes in administrative practice |
| Conclusion & forward look | 20% | 10 | Synthesizes across parts: contextual administration's continued relevance, gender as development accelerator, holistic HRM, evolving state-market boundaries, predictive governance through AI-MIS integration | Perfunctory summaries for each sub-part without synthesis; repetitive restatement of points made | Missing conclusions for sub-parts or abrupt endings; no forward-looking perspective on administrative transformation |
Practice this exact question
Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.
Evaluate my answer →More from Public Administration 2021 Paper I
- Q1 Answer the following in about 150 words each: (a) "Governance is about managing self-organizing networks." Elaborate. (10 marks) (b) "Two-d…
- Q2 (a) Behavioural approach has been questioned on the basis of its utility in the analysis of administrative problems. Discuss the weaknesses…
- Q3 (a) Integration of different streams of administrative thought to propound a universal administrative theory is hindered by the impact of c…
- Q4 (a) The new public service model approaches governance on the premises of an active and involved citizenship, wherein the role of public of…
- Q5 Answer the following in about 150 words each: (a) The approach to the study of administration in its environmental context is especially mo…
- Q6 (a) Emphasis on cost control and reducing public expenditure has diverted the focus of government budgets from the basic objectives of real…
- Q7 (a) Policy problems are increasingly tending towards being wicked. Discuss the capacity and preparedness of the State to tackle such proble…
- Q8 (a) The successful attainment of SDGs objectives largely depends upon the wisdom, experience and farsightedness of the actors involved and…