(a) The successful attainment of SDGs objectives largely depends upon the wisdom, experience and farsightedness of the actors involved and their willingness to cooperate in the implementation process. Analyze. (20 marks)

(b) Groups work to elevate i

Question

(a) The successful attainment of SDGs objectives largely depends upon the wisdom, experience and farsightedness of the actors involved and their willingness to cooperate in the implementation process. Analyze. (20 marks)

(b) Groups work to elevate issues on the policy agenda or seek to deny other groups the opportunity to place issues. In this background, discuss the role of interest groups in agenda setting in the developing countries. (15 marks)

(c) Civil servants generally tend to exhibit the values and ethical framework of the political executives under whom they function. Explain. (15 marks)

UPSC Answer Check · Accepted Answer

The directive 'analyse' in part (a) demands breaking down the SDG implementation process into actor-specific roles and their interdependencies; parts (b) and (c) require 'discuss' and 'explain' respectively. Allocate approximately 40% of time/words to part (a) given its 20 marks, and roughly 30% each to parts (b) and (c). Structure with a brief composite introduction, three distinct sections addressing each sub-part with clear sub-headings, and an integrated conclusion that synthesizes insights on governance actors, agenda dynamics, and ethical leadership.
- Part (a): Multi-level governance actors (international bodies, national governments, sub-national actors, CSOs, private sector) and their cooperative mechanisms for SDG localization
- Part (a): Wisdom and farsightedness demonstrated through anticipatory governance, scenario planning, and adaptive management in SDG implementation
- Part (b): Interest group typologies (pluralist vs. corporatist) and their strategies for agenda setting—issue expansion, venue shopping, and non-decision making in developing country contexts
- Part (b): Structural constraints in developing countries—weak civil society, elite capture, patron-client networks—that distort agenda setting processes
- Part (c): Political-bureaucratic interface theories explaining value transmission—politicization of civil service, ministerial-bureaucrat relations, and the 'spoils system'
- Part (c): Counter-arguments including civil service neutrality, constitutional values, and institutional safeguards that resist political value capture

Dimension	Weight	Max marks	Excellent	Average	Poor
Concept correctness	20%	10	Accurately distinguishes SDG implementation mechanisms (partnerships, multi-stakeholder governance) from mere coordination; correctly identifies agenda-setting concepts (Kingdon's streams, Cobb-Ross's agenda access model) and distinguishes political values from constitutional values in civil service ethics	Basic understanding of SDG actors and interest group functions but conflates agenda setting with policy formulation; treats civil service values as uniformly determined by political executives without nuance	Fundamental errors such as treating SDGs as purely technical exercises, confusing interest groups with political parties, or claiming civil servants have no independent ethical framework
Theoretical anchor	20%	10	Deploys multi-level governance theory (Hooghe/Marks) for part (a); Kingdon's multiple streams or Bachrach/Baratz's two faces of power for part (b); Riggs' prismatic society or Dwivedi-Bhargava's politico-administrative relations for part (c) with precise application	Mentions relevant theories superficially without systematic application; generic references to 'good governance' or 'democratic participation' without theoretical grounding	No theoretical framework; relies on commonsense assertions or misapplies theories (e.g., using Marxist class analysis for interest group pluralism without justification)
Indian administrative examples	20%	10	For (a): Aspirational Districts Programme or SDG India Index as evidence of cooperative federalism; for (b): EIA 2020 protests, farmer groups' agenda influence, or Aadhaar advocacy; for (c): Santhanam Committee recommendations, All India Services conduct rules, or specific case of civil service neutrality during Emergency/Coalition periods	Generic references to 'Panchayati Raj' or 'RTI activism' without specific SDG-localization or agenda-setting instances; vague statements about 'political pressure on bureaucracy'	No Indian examples or inappropriate examples (e.g., using Western lobbying cases for part b); factually incorrect references to constitutional provisions
Reform / policy angle	20%	10	Proposes institutional innovations: SDG monitoring dashboards with citizen feedback for (a); transparency mechanisms (disclosure norms, participatory budgeting) to democratize agenda setting for (b); insulating mechanisms (fixed tenure, civil service boards, ethical codes) combined with responsive bureaucracy for (c)	Routine recommendations without specificity—'strengthen coordination,' 'regulate interest groups,' 'train civil servants'—lacking implementation detail	No reform suggestions or utopian/unworkable proposals disconnected from administrative realities; purely critical stance without constructive alternatives
Conclusion & forward look	20%	10	Synthesizes three parts into coherent argument about democratic governance quality: SDG success requires not just technical capacity but inclusive agenda-setting and ethical autonomy; forward-looking recognition of emerging challenges (climate-induced displacement, AI governance, declining civic space)	Summarizes each part separately without integration; generic concluding statement about 'good governance' without addressing the tension between political responsiveness and bureaucratic neutrality	Missing conclusion or abrupt ending; conclusion contradicts body arguments; purely descriptive closing without analytical closure

Q8

Directive word: Analyse

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

Key points expected

Evaluation rubric

Practice this exact question

More from Public Administration 2021 Paper I