Public Administration 2021 Paper II 50 marks Discuss

Paper II — Q7

(a) Contemporary urbanism advocates the integration of diverse modes of urban planning and management concerns. Discuss the above…

(a)

Contemporary urbanism advocates the integration of diverse modes of urban planning and management concerns. Discuss the above statement in light of urban development in India. 20 marks

(b)

Rural development programmes are designed to facilitate multifaceted growth of rural poor. Evaluate the role of some key rural development programmes in India in this context. 20 marks

(c)

Police-public relations in India need to be improved. Suggest measures to strengthen relations between police and public. 10 marks

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें
(a)

समकालीन नगरवाद नगर योजना तथा प्रबंधन सरोकारों के विविध रूपों के समाकलन का पक्ष समर्थन करता है। भारत में नगर विकास के आलोक में उक्त कथन की विवेचना कीजिये। (20 अंक)

(b)

ग्रामीण विकास कार्यक्रम ग्रामीण निर्धन के बहुमुखी विकास को सुगम बनाने के लिये तैयार किये गये हैं। इस संदर्भ में भारत में कुछ मुख्य ग्रामीण विकास कार्यक्रमों की भूमिका की विवेचना कीजिये। (20 अंक)

(c)

भारत में पुलिस-जन संबंधों को सुधारने की आवश्यकता है। पुलिस और जनता के मध्य संबंधों को सुदृढ़ करने के उपाय सुझाइये। (10 अंक)

Q7 of the 2021 UPSC Mains Public Administration Paper II, as printed
The question as printed in the 2021 Public Administration paper

Model answer

Drafted with AI by UPSC Answer Check against this question's marking rubric, to the expected length. UPSC does not publish answers for Mains — this is one way to score well, not an official key. How we build rubrics and answers.

(a) Integrated urbanism in Indian urban development

Contemporary urbanism treats the city as an ecosystem needing integrated spatial, environmental, social and economic planning, moving beyond rigid master-planning to compact, transit-oriented, digitally governed and climate-resilient cities. About 31% of Indians lived in urban areas in 2011 and well over a third do today, and national missions reflect this shift. The National Transit Oriented Development Policy (2017) links land use with transport. The Smart Cities Mission (2015, closed in March 2025) combined area-based upgrades with technology through Integrated Command and Control Centres. AMRUT (2015; AMRUT 2.0 from 2021) targets universal water supply and sewerage, and HRIDAY (2015-19) integrated heritage conservation with infrastructure renewal.

Implementation falters because governance is fragmented. The 74th Amendment's 18 Twelfth Schedule functions are incompletely devolved, Metropolitan Planning Committees (Article 243ZE) are largely non-functional, and parastatals such as development authorities overlap with municipalities. Area-based projects therefore create pockets of modern infrastructure while informal settlements, urban flooding and ecological stress remain unaddressed.

(b) Key rural development programmes and multifaceted growth

Rural programmes have moved from stand-alone income schemes to multidimensional interventions covering livelihoods, assets, housing and skills.

MGNREGA (2005, now succeeded by the VB-G RAM G Act, 2025) gave a rights-based safety net, reduced distress migration and built water and soil conservation assets. DAY-NRLM (Aajeevika, 2011) has mobilised about 10 crore women into Self-Help Groups, building social capital, credit access and micro-enterprise. PMAY-G (2016) pairs housing with sanitation under Swachh Bharat Mission and electricity under Saubhagya (2017), while DDU-GKY (2014) provides market-linked skills to rural youth. NITI Aayog estimates the rural multidimensional poverty headcount fell sharply between 2015-16 and 2019-21, on gains in housing, sanitation, cooking fuel and bank accounts.

Gaps constrain outcomes: convergence deficits across line departments, delayed wage payments and uneven asset quality under MGNREGA, elite capture in Panchayati Raj Institutions and weak monitoring and evaluation that limit reach to the most marginalised.

(c) Strengthening police-public relations

A trust deficit, rooted in the colonial Police Act, 1861, political interference and weak community engagement, hurts police-public relations. Measures:

The Union and States should implement the Supreme Court directives in Prakash Singh v. Union of India (2006): State Security Commissions and independent Police Complaints Authorities to curb extraneous interference and enforce accountability.

State police should scale up community policing such as Kerala's Janamaithri Suraksha and Tamil Nadu's Friends of Police for grievance redressal and joint crime prevention.

Police training institutions should build human rights, soft-skill and gender-sensitisation training, while the CCTNS (2009) and the e-FIR and Zero FIR provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (in force from July 2024) give citizens transparent, easier access, in the spirit of 'SMART' policing (2014).

How this answer will be evaluated

What earns full marks: Clear analytical structure with specific Indian examples, named committees/schemes, and strong PA lens throughout.

Evaluation rubric

Each sub-part is marked on its own, against the marks and word limit printed on the paper.

  1. (a) Analyze the integration of diverse urban planning modes in India. 20 marks

    discuss— intro → 3-4 dimensions → example → balanced close

    Must cover

    • Define contemporary urbanism's integration of planning modes
    • Link theory to Indian urban development context
    • Provide 3-4 dimensions of integration
    • Assess the gap between integrated planning aims and fragmented governance

    Loses marks

    • Theory without Indian administrative examples
    • GS-2 style policy discussion without PA lens
    • No clear analytical structure

    Earns more

    • Mention specific Indian urban planning initiatives
    • Reference relevant urban development policies
    • Discuss challenges in implementation
    • Compare traditional vs contemporary approaches

    Extra mark

    • Cite 2nd ARC urban governance recommendations
    • Reference Smart Cities Mission specifics
  2. (b) Assess key rural development programmes' role in multifaceted growth. 20 marks

    evaluate— criteria → evidence → balanced judgment

    Must cover

    • Establish evaluation criteria for rural programmes
    • Name and analyze specific Indian rural development schemes
    • Provide evidence of multifaceted growth impact
    • Deliver balanced judgment on effectiveness

    Loses marks

    • Listing schemes without analytical evaluation
    • No clear criteria for assessment
    • Theory without Indian programme anchors

    Earns more

    • Mention MGNREGA, PMAY, or similar flagship schemes
    • Discuss implementation gaps vs design intent
    • Reference relevant committees or commissions
    • Show administration vs politics distinction

    Extra mark

    • Cite specific 2nd ARC rural governance recommendations
    • Reference recent rural development reforms
  3. (c) Propose implementable measures to strengthen police-public relations. 10 marks

    suggest— the problem in one line → implementable measures → who acts → conclusion

    Must cover

    • Identify the trust deficit (colonial 1861 Act legacy, politicisation)
    • Provide implementable measures
    • Specify who acts on each measure
    • Link measures to improved public trust and responsiveness

    Loses marks

    • Vague suggestions without implementation details
    • No clear actor specified for measures
    • GS-2 style without administrative focus

    Earns more

    • Reference specific police reform mechanisms
    • Mention citizen feedback systems
    • Discuss community policing models
    • Reference relevant police acts or reforms

    Extra mark

    • Cite 2nd ARC police reform recommendations
    • Reference specific state-level police reforms
What "Discuss" is asking you to do

Lay the issue out from more than one side — how it arose, what is claimed for it, what is held against it, and where it now stands. UPSC attaches discuss to broad topics with several live dimensions, so coverage of the dimensions earns more than the strength of your opinion.

Structure that answers it

Set the issue up → the case as it is made → the case against → the dimension both sides leave out → where the balance now lies

Where marks are lost

Listing facts with no thread between them, or arguing one side throughout and calling it a discussion.

All UPSC directive words, compared →

Practice this exact question

Write your answer and it is marked point by point against the model answer above — what you covered, what you missed, what you got wrong.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Public Administration 2021 Paper II

Write this answer and get it marked in about 20 seconds

Free account: 5 AI evaluations a month, marked against the rubric above.

Start free

Already have an account? Log in