Public Administration 2022 Paper II 50 marks Analyse

Q6

(a) The recommendations of National Finance Commissions are more norms based than the need based. In the light of this statement analyse the terms of references of 15th National Finance Commission. 20 (b) "The objective of Mission Karmyogi is to enhance capacity building of Indian Civil Servants and improve governance." Discuss. 20 (c) Parliamentary control over administration is no substitute for judicial control. Comment. 10

हिंदी में प्रश्न पढ़ें

(a) राष्ट्रीय वित्त आयोगों की अनुशंसाएं आवश्यकता आधारित होने के बजाय मानक आधारित होती हैं। इस कथन के प्रकाश में 15वें वित्त आयोग के विचाराधीन विषयों का विश्लेषण कीजिए। 20 (b) "मिशन कर्मयोगी का उद्देश्य भारतीय सिविल सेवकों की क्षमता निर्माण में वृद्धि करना और (अभि)शासन में सुधार करना है।" विवेचन कीजिए। 20 (c) प्रशासन पर संसदीय नियंत्रण न्यायिक नियंत्रण का प्रतिस्थानापत्र नहीं है। टिप्पणी कीजिए। 10

Evaluate your answer to this question → See all 2022 Public Administration questions

Directive word: Analyse

This question asks you to analyse. The directive word signals the depth of analysis expected, the structure of your answer, and the weight of evidence you must bring.

See our UPSC directive words guide for a full breakdown of how to respond to each command word.

How this answer will be evaluated

Approach

The directive 'analyse' for part (a) demands breaking down the ToR into components and evaluating the norms vs. need-based tension; for (b) 'discuss' requires examining multiple dimensions of Mission Karmyogi; for (c) 'comment' needs a balanced view with your stance. Allocate approximately 40% time/words to part (a) given its 20 marks and analytical depth required, 35% to part (b) for comprehensive discussion, and 25% to part (c) for crisp commentary. Structure: brief integrated intro, then tackle each part sequentially with clear sub-headings, end with a synthesizing conclusion on capacity-building and accountability in Indian governance.

Key points expected

  • Part (a): Analysis of 15th FC ToR showing predominance of population (2011), area, forest cover as normative criteria versus limited weight to 'need-based' indicators like income distance, demographic transition costs, or disaster vulnerability
  • Part (a): Critical evaluation of how ToR constraints (population data freeze, fiscal discipline parameters) limit need-based flexibility; contrast with 14th FC's innovation on income distance
  • Part (b): Mission Karmyogi's iGOT Karmayogi platform, competency framework (70 roles, 280 competencies), and shift from rule-based to role-based HR management in civil services
  • Part (b): Linkage between capacity building and governance outcomes—examples like PMGatiShakti, Aspirational Districts Programme where trained civil servants improved service delivery
  • Part (c): Distinction between parliamentary control (political accountability, Question Hour, committees) and judicial control (rule of law, PIL, writ jurisdiction) with examples like 2G spectrum case vs. parliamentary debates
  • Part (c): Why substitution fails—separation of powers, delayed justice vs. immediate accountability, different remedies; reference to S.P. Gupta, Vineet Narain cases on judicial activism filling gaps

Evaluation rubric

DimensionWeightMax marksExcellentAveragePoor
Concept correctness20%10Precise distinction between norms-based (quantifiable, formula-driven) and need-based (contextual, equity-focused) criteria in (a); accurate description of iGOT platform, SPV structure, competency pyramid in (b); clear delineation of parliamentary instruments (financial, administrative, legislative) versus judicial remedies (certiorari, mandamus, prohibition) in (c)Basic understanding of Finance Commission purpose but conflates norms/needs; generic description of training without Mission Karmyogi specifics; mixes parliamentary and judicial functions without clear distinctionFundamental errors like treating Finance Commission as planning body; describes Mission Karmyogi as mere training programme without institutional architecture; confuses judicial review with parliamentary oversight mechanisms
Theoretical anchor20%10Deploys Buchanan's fiscal federalism (leviathan control, tax competition) for (a); applies Argyris-Schön double-loop learning or competency-based HRM theory for (b); uses Dicey's rule of law, Montesquieu's separation of powers, or Bagehot's dignified/efficient constitution for (c)Mentions federalism or decentralization without theoretical depth; describes capacity building without theoretical framework; references basic separation of powers without applicationNo theoretical framework; purely descriptive answer without connecting to public administration theories; misapplies theories (e.g., using New Public Management for judicial control)
Indian administrative examples20%10For (a): cites 14th FC's income distance weighting (50%) vs 15th FC's reduction (45%), specific states disadvantaged (southern states' demographic transition penalty); for (b): names specific iGOT modules (District Collector programme, PM Fellows), mentions Capacity Building Commission; for (c): references specific cases (Coal block allocation, NJAC verdict) and parliamentary committees (PAC, CAG reports on 2G)Mentions Finance Commission exists without specific ToR comparisons; general reference to civil service training without Mission Karmyogi specifics; knows PIL exists but no landmark casesNo Indian examples; hypothetical or foreign illustrations; factual errors about constitutional bodies or recent reforms
Reform / policy angle20%10For (a): suggests reforms like dynamic weighting for demographic transition, performance-linked grants beyond basic GSDP; for (b): critically evaluates implementation gaps (digital divide, resistance from senior bureaucrats), suggests integration with lateral entry, domain specialization; for (c): proposes complementary mechanisms like pre-legislative scrutiny, sunset clauses, or administrative tribunals strengtheningMentions need for reform without specific suggestions; describes Mission Karmyogi positively without critical gaps; suggests more parliamentary committees without specificityNo reform suggestions; purely critical or purely laudatory without constructive angle; irrelevant suggestions like abolishing Finance Commission
Conclusion & forward look20%10Synthesizes all three parts into coherent argument about state capacity—fiscal capacity (FC), human capacity (Mission Karmyogi), and accountability mechanisms (parliamentary + judicial as complementary); forward look includes 16th FC expectations, National Recruitment Agency integration, and proposed Administrative Tribunals reforms; balanced, nuanced final stanceSeparate conclusions for each part without integration; generic 'need for good governance' ending; no forward-looking elementMissing conclusion; abrupt end; contradictory final stance; no connection between sub-parts; purely summary without synthesis

Practice this exact question

Write your answer, then get a detailed evaluation from our AI trained on UPSC's answer-writing standards. Free first evaluation — no signup needed to start.

Evaluate my answer →

More from Public Administration 2022 Paper II